The effect of numerical distance and stimulus probability on ERP components elicited by numerical incongruencies in mental addition.

In two experiments, we investigated the effect of the numerical distance of incongruous results from correct results and stimulus probability on the N270/N400 event-related brain potential components. In Experiment 1, 12 subjects saw two one-digit addends and a possible solution and signaled if the proposed result (falling in the range of 3-17) was true or false. Incorrect results could deviate by +/-2 or by +/-9 from the correct answer. The probability of correct results was 50%. Twelve subjects carried out a similar task in Experiment 2 without giving behavioral responses. The probability of incorrect results was 20%, 50% or 80% in different conditions. Both raw potentials and incorrect minus correct difference potentials were analyzed. A fronto-central N3 and a centro-parietal dN3 (incorrect-correct difference) were present for incongruous results in both experiments. The amplitude of the dN3 was not sensitive to numerical distance, but the latency of the dN3 was longer when numerical distance was larger. The overall amplitude of the N3 and of the dN3 was not sensitive to the probability manipulation. However, there was a parietally localized effect of probability on N3 amplitude. The dN3 in mental addition is most probably identical to the arithmetic N400 effect reported earlier in mental multiplication. The distance effect in latency may be a correlate of the discrimination of correct vs. incorrect results. A parietally localized probability effect (right greater than left) was found in the N3 amplitude. The dN3 was insensitive to the probability manipulation. In accord with its insensitivity to stimulus probability, the dN3 seems to be more related to the N400 than to the N2b. Posterior attentional processes sensitive to the allocation of attentional resources may have contributed to the topography of the dN3. The N3 is more related to the detection of expectation violation, while the P3 reflects the ease of identifying stimulus categories.

[1]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing , 1995 .

[2]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. , 1977, Science.

[3]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[4]  Xiaofu Tang,et al.  Event-related potential N270 is elicited by mental conflict processing in human brain , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  Paul B. Buckley,et al.  Comparisons of digits and dot patterns. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociating Prefrontal and Parietal Cortex Activation during Arithmetic Processing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[7]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Differential Contributions of the Left and Right Inferior Parietal Lobules to Number Processing , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Thayer,et al.  The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[9]  Marta Kutas,et al.  The intractability of scaling scalp distributions to infer neuroelectric sources. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[10]  A. Henik,et al.  Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Frank Rösler,et al.  Comparing arithmetic and semantic fact retrieval: effects of problem size and sentence constraint on event-related brain potentials. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[12]  M. Eimer.  The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  Yuping Wang,et al.  Enhancement of conflict processing activity in human brain under task relevant condition , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The Organization of Brain Activations in Number Comparison: Event-Related Potentials and the Additive-Factors Method , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Fayol,et al.  When plausibility judgments supersede fact retrieval: The example of the odd-even effect on product verification , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[16]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[17]  N. Squires,et al.  The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. , 1976, Science.

[18]  Mark H. Ashcraft,et al.  Cognitive arithmetic: Evidence for retrieval and decision processes in mental addition. , 1978 .

[19]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  M. Posner,et al.  Brain mechanisms of quantity are similar in 5-year-old children and adults. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[22]  S Dehaene,et al.  Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Yuping Wang,et al.  Event-related potentials elicited by stimulus spatial discrepancy in humans , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[24]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Representation of the Quantity of Visual Items in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[25]  G. Groen,et al.  A chronometric analysis of simple addition. , 1972 .

[26]  Yuping Wang,et al.  The N270 component of the event-related potential reflects supramodal conflict processing in humans , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  M. Perlmutter,et al.  Cognitive arithmetic: comparison of operations. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Jeffrey Bisanz,et al.  Multiple routes to solution of single-digit multiplication problems. , 1996 .

[30]  Frank Rösler,et al.  N400 Effects Reflect Activation Spread During Retrieval of Arithmetic Facts , 1999 .

[31]  ● Pytorch,et al.  Attention! , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[34]  F Rösler,et al.  Processing of incongruous mental calculation problems: evidence for an arithmetic N400 effect. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[35]  Janet A. Schmidt,et al.  Associative confusions in mental arithmetic , 1974 .

[36]  F. Restle.  Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[37]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Mental comparison of size and magnitude: size congruity effects. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  Mark H. Ashcraft,et al.  A network approach to mental multiplication. , 1982 .

[39]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[40]  John M. Parkman,et al.  Temporal Aspects of Simple Multiplication and Comparison. , 1972 .

[41]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Modulation of Parietal Activation by Semantic Distance in a Number Comparison Task , 2001, NeuroImage.