Influence of Transfer Gate Design and Bias on the Radiation Hardness of Pinned Photodiode CMOS Image Sensors

The effects of Cobalt 60 gamma-ray irradiation on pinned photodiode (PPD) CMOS image sensors (CIS) are investigated by comparing the total ionizing dose (TID) response of several transfer gate (TG) and PPD designs manufactured using a 180 nm CIS process. The TID induced variations of charge transfer efficiency (CTE), pinning voltage, equilibrium full well capacity (EFWC), full well capacity (FWC) and dark current measured on the different pixel designs lead to the conclusion that only three degradation sources are responsible for all the observed radiation effects: the pre-metal dielectric (PMD) positive trapped charge, the TG sidewall spacer positive trapped charge and, with less influence, the TG channel shallow trench isolation (STI) trapped charge. The different FWC evolutions with TID presented here are in very good agreement with a recently proposed analytical model. This work also demonstrates that the peripheral STI is not responsible for the observed degradations and thus that the enclosed layout TG design does not improve the radiation hardness of PPD CIS. The results of this study also lead to the conclusion that the TG OFF voltage bias during irradiation has no influence on the radiation effects. Alternative design and process solutions to improve the radiation hardness of PPD CIS are discussed.

[1]  P. Paillet,et al.  Temperature Dependence and Dynamic Behavior of Full Well Capacity in Pinned Photodiode CMOS Image Sensors , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[2]  Olivier Marcelot,et al.  Pixel Level Characterization of Pinned Photodiode and Transfer Gate Physical Parameters in CMOS Image Sensors , 2014, IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society.

[3]  Donald B. Hondongwa,et al.  A Review of the Pinned Photodiode for CCD and CMOS Image Sensors , 2014, IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society.

[4]  E. Martín,et al.  Gamma and Proton-Induced Dark Current Degradation of 5T CMOS Pinned Photodiode $0.18~\mu\hbox{m}$ CMOS Image Sensors , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  B. Giordanengo,et al.  Irradiation Damage Tests on Backside-Illuminated CMOS APS Prototypes for the Extreme Ultraviolet Imager On-Board Solar Orbiter , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[6]  P. Magnan,et al.  Estimation and Modeling of the Full Well Capacity in Pinned Photodiode CMOS Image Sensors , 2013, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[7]  Pierre Magnan,et al.  Radiation Effects in CMOS Isolation Oxides: Differences and Similarities With Thermal Oxides , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[8]  M. Gaillardin,et al.  Radiation Effects in Pinned Photodiode CMOS Image Sensors: Pixel Performance Degradation Due to Total Ionizing Dose , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[9]  F. Roy,et al.  Rad Tolerant CMOS Image Sensor Based on Hole Collection 4T Pixel Pinned Photodiode , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[10]  B. L. Bhuva,et al.  Impact of Back-Gate Bias and Device Geometry on the Total Ionizing Dose Response of 1-Transistor Floating Body RAMs , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  N. Blanc,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Lag Sources in Pinned Photodiodes , 2012, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[12]  A. J. P. Theuwissen,et al.  Analyzing the Radiation Degradation of 4-Transistor Deep Submicron Technology CMOS Image Sensors , 2012, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[13]  P. Magnan,et al.  Generic Radiation Hardened Photodiode Layouts for Deep Submicron CMOS Image Sensor Processes , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  M. Gaillardin,et al.  Enhanced Radiation-Induced Narrow Channel Effects in Commercial ${\hbox {0.18}}~\mu$ m Bulk Technology , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[15]  S. Allegret,et al.  Radiation Effects on CMOS Image Sensors With Sub-2 $\mu{\rm m}$ Pinned Photodiodes , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[16]  F. Roy,et al.  New mechanism of plasma induced damage on CMOS image sensor: Analysis and process optimization , 2010, 2010 Proceedings of the European Solid State Device Research Conference.

[17]  H. Lee,et al.  Decrease of Dark Current by Reducing Transfer Transistor Induced Partition Noise With Localized Channel Implantation , 2010, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[18]  Albert J. P. Theuwissen,et al.  Degradation of CMOS image sensors in deep-submicron technology due to γ-irradiation , 2008 .

[19]  A. Theuwissen,et al.  Negative Offset Operation of Four-Transistor CMOS Image Pixels for Increased Well Capacity and Suppressed Dark Current , 2008, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[20]  Eric G. Stevens,et al.  Low-Crosstalk and Low-Dark-Current CMOS Image-Sensor Technology Using a Hole-Based Detector , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - Digest of Technical Papers.

[21]  Kenneth F. Galloway,et al.  A model of radiation effects in nitride–oxide films for power MOSFET applications , 2003 .

[22]  Yoshihiro Takahashi,et al.  Radiation-induced trapped charge in metal-nitride-oxide-semiconductor structure , 1999 .

[23]  Bedabrata Pain,et al.  Analysis and Enhancement of Low-Light-Level Performance of Photodiode-Type CMOS Active Pixel Images Operated with Sub-Threshold Reset , 1999 .

[24]  R.,et al.  Challenges in hardening technologies using shallow-trench isolation , 1998 .

[25]  N. Bluzer,et al.  Charge partition noise in charge-coupled devices , 1987 .

[26]  N. Mutoh,et al.  Partition noise in CCD signal detection , 1986, 1985 International Electron Devices Meeting.

[27]  James R. Janesick,et al.  Fundamental performance differences of CMOS and CCD imagers: part V , 2013, Electronic Imaging.

[28]  M. Gaillardin,et al.  Identification of radiation induced dark current sources in Pinned PhotoDiode CMOS Image Sensors , 2011, 2011 12th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems.

[29]  M. Innocent,et al.  A radiation tolerant 4T pixel for space applications , 2009 .

[30]  Sangsik Park,et al.  The effect of size on photodiode pinch-off voltage for small pixel CMOS image sensors , 2009, Microelectron. J..

[31]  James Andrews,et al.  Fundamental performance differences between CMOS and CCD imagers: part III , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[32]  Kwangho Yoon,et al.  Evaluation of a Small Negative Transfer Gate Bias on the Performance of 4T CMOS Image Sensor Pixels , 2007 .

[33]  James Andrews,et al.  Fundamental performance differences between CMOS and CCD imagers: Part II , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.