The Biological Foundations of Enactivism: A Report on a Workshop Held at Artificial Life XV

This is a report on the Biological Foundations of Enactivism Workshop, which was held as part of Artificial Life XV. The workshop aimed to revisit enactivism's contributions to biology and to revitalize the discussion of autonomy with the goal of grounding it in quantitative definitions based in observable phenomena. This report summarizes some of the important issues addressed in the workshop's talks and discussions, which include how to identify emergent individuals out of an environmental background, what the roles of autonomy and normativity are in biological theory, how new autonomous agents can spontaneously emerge at the origins of life, and what science can say about subjective experience.

[1]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Modelling autonomy: Simulating the essence of life and cognition , 2008, Biosyst..

[2]  J. Adler,et al.  Chemoreceptors in bacteria. , 1969, Science.

[3]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition in the Game of Life , 2004, Artificial Life.

[4]  T. Froese,et al.  From Second‐order Cybernetics to Enactive Cognitive Science: Varela's Turn From Epistemology to Phenomenology , 2011 .

[5]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  The Cognitive Domain of a Glider in the Game of Life , 2014, Artificial Life.

[6]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Autopoiesis, Adaptivity, Teleology, Agency , 2005 .

[7]  Mario Villalobos,et al.  Enactive cognitive science: revisionism or revolution? , 2013, Adapt. Behav..

[8]  Nathaniel Virgo,et al.  Life as a process of open-ended becoming: Analysis of a minimal model , 2011, ECAL.

[9]  Nathaniel F. Barrett,et al.  The Normative Turn in Enactive Theory: An Examination of Its Roots and Implications , 2017 .

[10]  J. Waller,et al.  Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind , 2009 .

[11]  Matthew D. Egbert,et al.  Adapting to Adaptations: Behavioural Strategies that are Robust to Mutations and Other Organisational-Transformations , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  Exploring the Space of Viable Configurations in a Model of Metabolism–Boundary Co-construction , 2016, Artificial Life.

[13]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  Inter- and En- activism: Some thoughts and comparisons , 2016 .

[14]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  Characterizing Autopoiesis in the Game of Life , 2015, Artificial Life.

[15]  Marina Basu.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 2004 .

[16]  Marieke Rohde,et al.  Editorial: Agency in Natural and Artificial Systems , 2009, Adapt. Behav..

[17]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  The Structure of Ontogenies in a Model Protocell , 2016, Artificial Life.