Efficacy and Safety of a Booster Vaccination with Two Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines on Symptomatic COVID-19 Infection in Adults: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial in Abu Dhabi

Abstracts Importance: The protective efficacy of COVID-19 vaccinations has declined over time such that booster doses are required. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of booster doses of two inactivated COVID-19 vaccines. Design: This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial aiming to evaluate the protective efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Vero cells) after inoculation with booster doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine. Setting: Healthy volunteers were recruited in an earlier phase 3 trial of two doses of inactivated vaccine. The participants in Abu Dhabi maintained the blind state of the trial and received a booster dose of vaccine or placebo at least six months after the primary immunization. Participants: Adults aged 18 and older with no history of SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, or Middle East respiratory syndrome infection (via onsite inquiry) were screened for eligibility. Interventions: A total of 9370 volunteers were screened and randomly allocated, of which 61 voluntarily withdrew from the screening stage without booster inoculation; 9309 received the booster vaccination, with 3083 in the WIV04 group, 3150 in the HB02 group, and 3076 in the alum-only group. Further, 5μg and 4μg of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virion was adsorbed into aluminum hydroxide in a 0.5 mL aqueous suspension for WIV04 and HB02 vaccines. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was the prevention of PCR-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 from 14 days after the booster vaccine in the per-protocol population. A safety analysis was performed in the intention-to-treat population. Results: Symptomatic COVID-19 was identified in 36 participants in the WIV04 group (9.9 [95% CI, 7.2–13.8] per 1000 person-years), 28 in the HB02 group (7.6 [95% CI, 5.2–11.0] per 1000 person-years), and 193 in the alum-only group (55.2 [95% CI, 47.9–63.5] per 1000 person-years), resulting in a vaccine efficacy of 82.0% (95% CI, 74.2–87.8%) for WIV04 and 86.3% (95% CI, 79.6–91.1%) for HB02. One severe case of COVID-19 occurred in the alum-only group, and none occurred in the vaccine groups. Adverse reactions within seven days after vaccination occurred in 29.4% to 34.3% of participants in the three groups. Serious adverse events were rare and not related to vaccines (WIV04: 17 [0.5%]; HB02: 11 [0.4%]; alum only: 40 [1.3%]). Conclusions and Relevance: This study evaluated the safety of the booster dose, which was well tolerated by participants. Booster doses given over six months after the completion of primary immunization can help to provide more-effective protection against COVID-19 in healthy people 18 years of age or older. At the same time, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies produced by the two groups of experimental vaccines exhibited extensive cross-neutralization against representative SARS-CoV-2 variants. Trial Registration: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04510207).

[1]  G. Screaton,et al.  Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study , 2022, The Lancet.

[2]  H. Jäck,et al.  The Omicron variant is highly resistant against antibody-mediated neutralization: Implications for control of the COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, Cell.

[3]  J. Langley,et al.  Final efficacy analysis, interim safety analysis, and immunogenicity of a single dose of recombinant novel coronavirus vaccine (adenovirus type 5 vector) in adults 18 years and older: an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial , 2021, The Lancet.

[4]  Elisabeth Mahase Covid-19: Booster vaccine gives “significant increased protection” in over 50s , 2021, BMJ.

[5]  Jue Liu,et al.  Effectiveness and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in real-world studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, Infectious Diseases of Poverty.

[6]  J. Kertes,et al.  Effectiveness of a Third Dose of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine , 2021, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[7]  D. Montefiori,et al.  Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 variant mRNA vaccine boosters in healthy adults: an interim analysis , 2021, Nature Medicine.

[8]  E. Walsh,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization with BNT162b2 Vaccine Dose 3 , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  O. A. Ogun,et al.  Six-Month Effectiveness of BNT162B2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in a Large US Integrated Health System: A Retrospective Cohort Study , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  T. Fiolet,et al.  Comparing COVID-19 vaccines for their characteristics, efficacy and effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern: a narrative review , 2021, Clinical Microbiology and Infection.

[11]  Rebecca F. Halperin,et al.  Third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine in heart transplant recipients: Immunogenicity and clinical experience , 2021, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation.

[12]  A. Yılmaz,et al.  Efficacy and safety of an inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac): interim results of a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial in Turkey , 2021, The Lancet.

[13]  P. Kalra,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 Covid-19 Vaccine , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  J. Izopet,et al.  Three Doses of an mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  M. Davenport,et al.  Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection , 2021, Nature Medicine.

[16]  H. Fennema,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of Single-Dose Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine against Covid-19 , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  S. Madhi,et al.  Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant , 2021, The New England Journal of Medicine.

[18]  D. Ho,et al.  Antibody resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and B.1.1.7 , 2021, Nature.

[19]  D. Stuart,et al.  Reduced neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 variant by convalescent and vaccine sera , 2021, Cell.

[20]  N. Sullivan,et al.  Serum Neutralizing Activity Elicited by mRNA-1273 Vaccine - Preliminary Report. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  M. Nussenzweig,et al.  mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and circulating variants , 2021, Nature.

[22]  V. Gushchin,et al.  Safety and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine: an interim analysis of a randomised controlled phase 3 trial in Russia , 2021, The Lancet.

[23]  Nguyen H. Tran,et al.  Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK , 2020, Lancet.

[24]  J. Mascola,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  P. Dormitzer,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  J. Mascola,et al.  Durability of Responses after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 Vaccination , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Wenling Wang,et al.  Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[28]  G. Gao,et al.  Development of an Inactivated Vaccine Candidate, BBIBP-CorV, with Potent Protection against SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Cell.