Using OrgAhead, a computational modeling program, to improve patient care unit safety and quality outcomes

As part of ongoing research to investigate the impact of patient characteristics, organization characteristics and patient unit characteristics on safety and quality outcomes, we used a computational modeling program, OrgAhead, to model patient care units' achievement of patient safety (medication errors and falls) and quality outcomes. We tuned OrgAhead using data we collected from 32 units in 12 hospitals in Arizona. Validation studies demonstrated acceptable levels of correspondence between actual and virtual patient units. In this paper, we report how we used OrgAhead to develop testable hypotheses about the kinds of innovations that nurse managers might realistically implement on their patient care units to improve quality and safety outcomes. Our focus was on unit-level innovations that are likely to be easier for managers to implement. For all but the highest performing unit (for which we encountered a ceiling effect), we were able to generate practical strategies that improved performance of the virtual units that could be implemented by actual units to improve safety and quality outcomes. Nurse managers have responded enthusiastically to the additional decision support for quality improvement.

[1]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Computational Modeling of Behavior in Organizations: The Third Scientific Discipline , 2000 .

[2]  J. Breslin.  The University of Arizona , 2000 .

[3]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Designing Stress Resistant Organizations , 2003 .

[4]  S. Jacobson,et al.  Evaluating the Design of a Family Practice Healthcare Clinic Using Discrete-Event Simulation , 2002, Health care management science.

[5]  H M O'Connor,et al.  The Use of Computer Simulation as a Strategic Decision-Making Tool: A Case Study of an Emergency Department Application , 1999, Healthcare management forum.

[6]  B. Jennings,et al.  Quality Health Outcomes Model , 1998 .

[7]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Using computational modeling to transform nursing data into actionable information , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[8]  Thomas R Rohleder,et al.  Rolling Horizon Appointment Scheduling: A Simulation Study , 2002, Health care management science.

[9]  Kathleen M. Carley.  Computational and mathematical organization theory: Perspective and directions , 1995, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[10]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Introduction to computational modeling in organizations: The good that modeling does. , 2000 .

[11]  G. Diehr,et al.  Linear programming models for cost reimbursement. , 1989, Health services research.

[12]  Judith A. Effken,et al.  Using Computational Modeling to Improve Patient Care Unit Safety and Quality Outcomes , 2004, MedInfo.

[13]  Silvana Quaglini,et al.  Simulation of a Stroke Unit Careflow , 2001, MedInfo.

[14]  M. Rauner,et al.  Using Simulation for AIDS Policy Modeling: Benefits for HIV/AIDS Prevention Policy Makers in Vienna, Austria , 2002, Health care management science.

[15]  H. J. Heinz,et al.  Tradeoffs Between Performance and Adaptability for C 3 I Architectures , 2001 .

[16]  Theresa K. Lant,et al.  Computer simulations of organizations as experiential learning systems: implications for organization theory , 1994 .

[17]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Computational organization theory , 1994 .

[18]  P. Harper.  A Framework for Operational Modelling of Hospital Resources , 2002, Health care management science.

[19]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN AND ADAPTATION IN RESPONSE TO CRISES: THEORY AND PRACTICE. , 2001 .

[20]  Kathleen M. Carley.  Organizational Adaptation in Volatile Environments , 2001 .