Tornado-Resolving Ensemble and Probabilistic Predictions of the 20 May 2013 Newcastle–Moore EF5 Tornado

An ensemble of 10 forecasts is produced for the 20 May 2013 Newcastle–Moore EF5 tornado and its parent supercell using a horizontal grid spacing of 50 m, nested within ensemble forecasts with 500-m horizontal grid spacing initialized via ensemble Kalman filter data assimilation of surface and radar observations. Tornadic circulations are predicted in all members, though the intensity, track, and longevity of the predicted tornado vary substantially among members. Overall, tornadoes in the ensemble forecasts persisted longer and moved to the northeast faster than the observed tornado. In total, 8 of the 10 ensemble members produce tornadoes with winds corresponding to EF2 intensity or greater, with maximum instantaneous near-surface horizontal wind speeds of up to 130 m s−1 and pressure drops of up to 120 hPa; values similar to those reported in observational studies of intense tornadoes. The predicted intense tornadoes all acquire well-defined two-cell vortex structure, and exhibit features common in observed tornadic storms, including a weak-echo notch and low reflectivity within the mesocyclone. Ensemble-based probabilistic tornado forecasts based upon near-surface wind and/or vorticity fields at 10 m above the surface produce skillful forecasts of the tornado in terms of area under the relative operating characteristic curve, with probability swaths extending along and to the northeast of the observed tornado path. When probabilistic swaths of 0–3- and 2–5-km updraft helicity are compared to the swath of wind at 10 m above the surface exceeding 29 m s−1, a slight northwestward bias is present, although the pathlength, orientation, and the placement of minima and maxima show very strong agreement.

[1]  James Correia,et al.  Tornado Pathlength Forecasts from 2010 to 2011 Using Ensemble Updraft Helicity , 2013 .

[2]  Alan Shapiro,et al.  Sensitivity of Real-Data Simulations of the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City Tornadic Supercell and Associated Tornadoes to Multimoment Microphysics. Part I: Storm- and Tornado-Scale Numerical Forecasts , 2015 .

[3]  M. Xue,et al.  The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) – A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part II: Model physics and applications , 2001 .

[4]  Ming Xue,et al.  Ensemble Probabilistic Forecasts of a Tornadic Mesoscale Convective System from Ensemble Kalman Filter Analyses using WSR-88D and CASA Radar Data , 2012 .

[5]  J. Deardorff Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model , 1980 .

[6]  Ming Xue,et al.  Prediction and Ensemble Forecast Verification of Hail in the Supercell Storms of 20 May 2013 , 2016 .

[7]  Qin Xu,et al.  Analyzing Vortex Winds in Radar-Observed Tornadic Mesocyclones for Nowcast Applications , 2015 .

[8]  Xuan Xin Mesovortices within the 8 May 2009 Bow Echo over the Central United States : Analyses of the Characteristics and Evolution Based on Doppler Radar Observations and a High-Resolution Model Simulation , 2015 .

[9]  M. Xue,et al.  The Role of Surface Drag in Mesocyclone Intensification Leading to Tornadogenesis within an Idealized Supercell Simulation , 2017 .

[10]  Burkely T. Gallo,et al.  Forecasting Tornadoes Using Convection-Permitting Ensembles , 2016 .

[11]  Louis J. Wicker,et al.  Impact of the Environmental Low-Level Wind Profile on Ensemble Forecasts of the 4 May 2007 Greensburg, Kansas, Tornadic Storm and Associated Mesocyclones , 2012 .

[12]  Alexander D. Schenkman,et al.  The Cause of Internal Outflow Surges in a High-Resolution Simulation of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Tornadic Supercell , 2016 .

[13]  Ming Xue,et al.  Multiscale EnKF Assimilation of Radar and Conventional Observations and Ensemble Forecasting for a Tornadic Mesoscale Convective System , 2015 .

[14]  Timothy A. Supinie,et al.  Comparison of the Analyses and Forecasts of a Tornadic Supercell Storm from Assimilating Phased-Array Radar and WSR-88D Observations , 2017 .

[15]  S. J. Weiss,et al.  Probabilistic Forecast Guidance for Severe Thunderstorms Based on the Identification of Extreme Phenomena in Convection-Allowing Model Forecasts , 2011 .

[16]  Corey K. Potvin,et al.  Practical Predictability of Supercells: Exploring Ensemble Forecast Sensitivity to Initial Condition Spread , 2018, Monthly Weather Review.

[17]  Stanley G. Benjamin,et al.  CONVECTIVE-SCALE WARN-ON-FORECAST SYSTEM: A vision for 2020 , 2009 .

[18]  A. Hollingsworth,et al.  Probabilistic Predictions of Precipitation Using the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System , 1999 .

[19]  Timothy A. Supinie,et al.  Impact of VORTEX2 Observations on Analyses and Forecasts of the 5 June 2009 Goshen County, Wyoming, Supercell , 2016 .

[20]  H. Niino,et al.  Important Factors for Tornadogenesis as Revealed by High-Resolution Ensemble Forecasts of the Tsukuba Supercell Tornado of 6 May 2012 in Japan , 2018 .

[21]  James Correia,et al.  Forecasting Tornado Pathlengths Using a Three-Dimensional Object Identification Algorithm Applied to Convection-Allowing Forecasts , 2012 .

[22]  Mingjing Tong,et al.  Simultaneous Estimation of Microphysical Parameters and Atmospheric State with Simulated Radar Data and Ensemble Square Root Kalman Filter. Part I: Sensitivity Analysis and Parameter Identifiability , 2008 .

[23]  Corey K. Potvin,et al.  Progress and challenges with Warn-on-Forecast , 2012 .

[24]  John S. Kain,et al.  Extracting Unique Information from High-Resolution Forecast Models: Monitoring Selected Fields and Phenomena Every Time Step , 2010 .

[25]  Nicholas E. Graham,et al.  Conditional Probabilities, Relative Operating Characteristics, and Relative Operating Levels , 1999 .

[26]  Alexander D. Schenkman,et al.  The Analysis and Prediction of the 8 – 9 May 2007 Oklahoma Tornadic Mesoscale Convective System by Assimilating WSR-88 D and CASA Radar Data Using 3 DVAR , 2011 .

[27]  Adam J. Clark,et al.  Volatility of Tornadogenesis: An Ensemble of Simulated Nontornadic and Tornadic Supercells in VORTEX2 Environments , 2017 .

[28]  Louis J. Wicker,et al.  EnKF Assimilation of High-Resolution, Mobile Doppler Radar Data of the 4 May 2007 Greensburg, Kansas, Supercell into a Numerical Cloud Model , 2013 .

[29]  Franco Siccardi,et al.  Turbulence Closure Parameterization and Grid Spacing Effects in Simulated Supercell Storms , 2010 .

[30]  R. Rotunno,et al.  Using High-Resolution Simulations to Quantify Underestimates of Tornado Intensity from In Situ Observations , 2017 .

[31]  Ming Hu,et al.  Tornadogenesis in a High-Resolution Simulation of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Supercell , 2014 .

[32]  Louis J. Wicker,et al.  Storm-Scale Data Assimilation and Ensemble Forecasts for the 27 April 2011 Severe Weather Outbreak in Alabama , 2015 .

[33]  Mingjing Tong,et al.  Ensemble Kalman Filter Analyses of the 29–30 May 2004 Oklahoma Tornadic Thunderstorm Using One- and Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics Schemes, with Verification against Polarimetric Radar Data , 2012 .

[34]  Louis J. Wicker,et al.  Simulation and Analysis of Tornado Development and Decay within a Three-Dimensional Supercell Thunderstorm , 1995 .

[35]  Daniel T. Dawson,et al.  Comparison of Evaporation and Cold Pool Development between Single-moment and Multi-moment Bulk Microphysics Schemes in Idealized Simulations of Tornadic Thunderstorms , 2009 .

[36]  Y. Wang,et al.  Mesovortices within the 8 May 2009 Bow Echo over the Central United States: Analyses of the Characteristics and Evolution Based on Doppler Radar Observations and a High-Resolution Model Simulation , 2013 .

[37]  Jing Cheng Storm-scale Data Assimilation and Ensemble Forecasts of 31 May 2013 El Reno, Oklahoma Tornado using Multi-function Phased Array Radar Observations , 2015 .

[38]  Alexander D. Schenkman,et al.  Sensitivity of Real-Data Simulations of the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City Tornadic Supercell and Associated Tornadoes to Multimoment Microphysics. Part II: Analysis of Buoyancy and Dynamic Pressure Forces in Simulated Tornado-Like Vortices , 2016 .

[39]  Ming Xue,et al.  A Hybrid MPI–OpenMP Parallel Algorithm and Performance Analysis for an Ensemble Square Root Filter Designed for Multiscale Observations , 2013 .

[40]  S. J. Weiss,et al.  Some Practical Considerations Regarding Horizontal Resolution in the First Generation of Operational Convection-Allowing NWP , 2008 .

[41]  H. Niino,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Tornadogenesis in an Outer-Rainband Minisupercell of Typhoon Shanshan on 17 September 2006 , 2009 .

[42]  John T. Snow,et al.  Multiple Vortex Features in the Tornado Cyclone and the Occurrence of Tornado Families , 1976 .

[43]  E. Lorenz,et al.  The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion , 1969 .

[44]  Ming Hu,et al.  Impact of Configurations of Rapid Intermittent Assimilation of Wsr-88d Radar Data for the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Tornadic Thunderstorm Case , 2022 .

[45]  Mingjing Tong,et al.  An OSSE Framework Based on the Ensemble Square Root Kalman Filter for Evaluating the Impact of Data from Radar Networks on Thunderstorm Analysis and Forecasting , 2006 .

[46]  Donald W. Burgess,et al.  20 May 2013 Moore, Oklahoma, Tornado: Damage Survey and Analysis , 2014 .

[47]  Craig S. Schwartz,et al.  Generating Probabilistic Forecasts from Convection-Allowing Ensembles Using Neighborhood Approaches: A Review and Recommendations , 2017 .

[48]  David J. Stensrud,et al.  Importance of Horizontally Inhomogeneous Environmental Initial Conditions to Ensemble Storm-Scale Radar Data Assimilation and Very Short-Range Forecasts , 2010 .

[49]  Alexander D. Schenkman,et al.  The Role of Surface Drag in Tornadogenesis within an Idealized Supercell Simulation , 2016 .

[50]  A Three-Step Method for Estimating Vortex Center Locations in Four-Dimensional Space from Radar-Observed Tornadic Mesocyclones , 2017 .

[51]  D. Stensrud,et al.  Practical Predictability of the 20 May 2013 Tornadic Thunderstorm Event in Oklahoma: Sensitivity to Synoptic Timing and Topographical Influence , 2015 .

[52]  Anthony E. Reinhart,et al.  Object-based verification of a prototype Warn-on-Forecast system. , 2018, Weather and forecasting.

[53]  Wataru Mashiko A Numerical Study of the 6 May 2012 Tsukuba City Supercell Tornado. Part I: Vorticity Sources of Low-Level and Midlevel Mesocyclones , 2016 .

[54]  Robert A. Houze,et al.  Clouds in Tropical Cyclones , 2010 .

[55]  S. Frasier,et al.  Mobile, X-band, Polarimetric Doppler Radar Observations of the 4 May 2007 Greensburg, Kansas, Tornadic Supercell , 2012 .

[56]  Ming Hu,et al.  Numerical Prediction of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Tornadic Supercell and Embedded Tornado Using ARPS with the Assimilation of WSR-88D Data , 2014 .

[57]  S. Lakshmivarahan,et al.  Ensemble Kalman filter , 2009, IEEE Control Systems.

[58]  K. Droegemeier,et al.  The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) – A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction model. Part I: Model dynamics and verification , 2000 .

[59]  Donald W. Burgess,et al.  Radar Observations of the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City Tornado , 2002 .

[60]  Ming Xue,et al.  Effects of microphysical drop size distribution on tornadogenesis in supercell thunderstorms , 2008 .

[61]  Joshua Wurman,et al.  Finescale Radar Observations of Tornado and Mesocyclone Structures , 2013 .

[62]  M. Yau,et al.  A Multimoment Bulk Microphysics Parameterization. Part II: A Proposed Three-Moment Closure and Scheme Description , 2005 .

[63]  Christopher C. Weiss,et al.  The Structure of Tornadoes near Attica, Kansas, on 12 May 2004: High-Resolution, Mobile, Doppler Radar Observations , 2007 .

[64]  Alexander D. Schenkman,et al.  The Analysis and Prediction of the 8–9 May 2007 Oklahoma Tornadic Mesoscale Convective System by Assimilating WSR-88D and CASA Radar Data Using 3DVAR , 2011 .

[65]  Wen-yih Sun,et al.  Diffusion Model for a Convective Layer. Part I: Numerical Simulation of Convective Boundary Layer , 1986 .

[66]  R. Palmer,et al.  Analysis of the 16 May 2015 Tipton, Oklahoma, EF-3 Tornado at High Spatiotemporal Resolution Using the Atmospheric Imaging Radar , 2018 .

[67]  M. Xue,et al.  3DVAR and Cloud Analysis with WSR-88D Level-II Data for the Prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, Tornadic Thunderstorms. Part I: Cloud Analysis and Its Impact , 2006 .

[68]  Louis J. Wicker,et al.  Wind and Temperature Retrievals in the 17 May 1981 Arcadia, Oklahoma, Supercell: Ensemble Kalman Filter Experiments , 2004 .

[69]  Wataru Mashiko A Numerical Study of the 6 May 2012 Tsukuba City Supercell Tornado. Part II: Mechanisms of Tornadogenesis , 2016 .

[70]  Vincent T. Wood,et al.  Simulated Tornadic Vortex Signatures of Tornado-Like Vortices Having One- and Two-Celled Structures , 2011 .

[71]  Alexander D. Schenkman,et al.  Tornadogenesis in a Simulated Mesovortex within a Mesoscale Convective System , 2012 .

[72]  Christopher D. Karstens,et al.  Near-Ground Pressure and Wind Measurements in Tornadoes* , 2010 .

[73]  Idealized simulations of aerosol influences on tornadogenesis , 2008 .

[74]  S. J. Weiss,et al.  Probabilistic Precipitation Forecast Skill as a Function of Ensemble Size and Spatial Scale in a Convection-Allowing Ensemble , 2011 .

[75]  Louis J. Wicker,et al.  Imported and Storm-Generated Near-Ground Vertical Vorticity in a Simulated Supercell* , 2014 .