Patients Selected for Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiation at High-volume Facilities Achieve Improved Survival in Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background: The relationship between provider experience and clinical outcomes is poorly defined in radiation oncology. This study examined the impact of facility case volume on overall survival in patients with stage III non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT). Methods: Using the National Cancer Data Base, we identified clinical stage III NSCLC patients diagnosed in 2004 to 2006 who were treated with definitive CCRT to 59.4–74.0 Gy. High-volume facilities (HVF) were defined as those in the ninetieth percentile of annual CCRT volume (≥12 cases/year). Independent predictors of receiving CCRT at HVF were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Overall survival based on receiving CCRT at HVF was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression, and propensity score matching. Results: Among 10,072 included patients, 1207 (12.0%) were treated at HVF. Patients in HVF were more likely to have a higher Charlson–Deyo comorbidity score, more advanced nodal stage, higher doses, and 3D-conformal or intensity-modulated radiotherapy. When controlling for demographic and clinical covariates including academic affiliation, treatment at HVF was independently associated with a significantly decreased risk of death (hazards ratio = 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.87–0.99; p = 0.03). Propensity score matching showed that these findings were robust (hazards ratio = 0.91; 95% confidence interval: 0.84–0.99; p = 0.04). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that treatment at HVF is associated with improved overall survival among stage III NSCLC patients receiving definitive CCRT, independent of academic affiliation. Further research is needed to determine whether or not efforts supporting centralization of radiotherapy at HVF will improve population-based survival, toxicities, and costs.

[1]  D. Winchester,et al.  Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Patients with Adrenocortical Carcinoma Associated with Hospital Case Volume in the United States , 2017, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[2]  W. Curran,et al.  Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  Quynh-Thu Le,et al.  Institutional clinical trial accrual volume and survival of patients with head and neck cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Renato Martins,et al.  Non-small cell lung cancer, version 1.2015. , 2014, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[5]  J. Sosa,et al.  Increased hospital volume is associated with improved outcomes following abdominal-based breast reconstruction , 2014, Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery.

[6]  C. Stevens,et al.  Phase 2 study of concurrent cetuximab plus definitive thoracic radiation therapy followed by consolidation docetaxel plus cetuximab in poor prognosis or elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Damon C Scales,et al.  Association between arterial catheter use and hospital mortality in intensive care units. , 2014, JAMA internal medicine.

[8]  S. Hung,et al.  Higher caseload improves cervical cancer survival in patients treated with brachytherapy , 2014, Radiation oncology.

[9]  Tae Hyun Kim,et al.  Is intermediate radiation dose escalation with concurrent chemotherapy for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer beneficial? A multi-institutional propensity score matched analysis. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Tae Hyun Kim,et al.  Poster Viewing AbstractIs Intermediate Radiation Dose Escalation With Concurrent Chemotherapy for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Beneficial?: A Multi-institutional Propensity-Score Matched Analysis , 2014 .

[11]  R. Weichselbaum,et al.  The effect of radiotherapy dose on survival in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer patients undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy. , 2014, Clinical lung cancer.

[12]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014 , 2014, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  D. Sher,et al.  Influence of conformal radiotherapy technique on survival after chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage III non‐small cell lung cancer in the National Cancer Data Base , 2014, Cancer.

[14]  N. Sharma,et al.  Controversies in the management of stage III non-small-cell lung cancer , 2014, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[15]  C. Faivre-Finn,et al.  How can we optimise concurrent chemoradiotherapy for inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer? , 2014, Lung cancer.

[16]  B. Monk,et al.  Impact of facility volume on therapy and survival for locally advanced cervical cancer. , 2014, Gynecologic oncology.

[17]  M. Krasnik,et al.  High procedure volume is strongly associated with improved survival after lung cancer surgery. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  C. Koning,et al.  Toxicity of concurrent radiochemotherapy for locally advanced non--small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature. , 2013, Clinical lung cancer.

[19]  J. Sonke,et al.  Severe late esophagus toxicity in NSCLC patients treated with IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  Adam Dicker,et al.  Radiotherapy protocol deviations and clinical outcomes: A meta-analysis of cooperative group clinical trials. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  D. Boffa,et al.  Impact of hospital volume of thoracoscopic lobectomy on primary lung cancer outcomes. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[22]  D. Schrag,et al.  Survival outcomes after radiation therapy for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer after adoption of computed tomography-based simulation. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Amy Y. Chen,et al.  Improved survival is associated with treatment at high‐volume teaching facilities for patients with advanced stage laryngeal cancer , 2010, Cancer.

[24]  Brian O'Sullivan,et al.  Critical impact of radiotherapy protocol compliance and quality in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer: results from TROG 02.02. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  S. Roman,et al.  Outcomes from 3144 adrenalectomies in the United States: which matters more, surgeon volume or specialty? , 2009, Archives of surgery.

[26]  Amy Y. Chen,et al.  Impact of treating facilities' volume on survival for early‐stage laryngeal cancer , 2009, Head & neck.

[27]  C. Ko,et al.  Effect of hospital volume on margin status after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[28]  M. Clark,et al.  Ethnic/Racial Disparities in Hospital Procedure Volume for Lung Resection for Lung Cancer , 2007, Medical care.

[29]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Race and Surgical Mortality in the United States , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[30]  Robert E Harbaugh,et al.  Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United States. , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[31]  F. Reboul,et al.  Radiotherapy and chemotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: preclinical and early clinical data. , 2004, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[32]  J. Meyerhardt,et al.  Association of Hospital Procedure Volume and Outcomes in Patients with Colon Cancer at High Risk for Recurrence , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[33]  C. Begg,et al.  Surgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resection , 2003, Journal of surgical oncology.

[34]  C. Begg,et al.  Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume as Predictors of Outcome Following Rectal Cancer Resection , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[35]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  C. Begg,et al.  The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 1999, Surgery.

[38]  E S Fisher,et al.  Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 1999, Surgery.

[39]  C. Begg,et al.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. , 1998, JAMA.

[40]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[41]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2014 , 2014, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[42]  J. Meyerhardt,et al.  Impact of hospital procedure volume on surgical operation and long-term outcomes in high-risk curatively resected rectal cancer: findings from the Intergroup 0114 Study. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  B. Sianesi,et al.  PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing , 2003 .

[44]  H. Wagner,et al.  Treatment of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. , 2003, Chest.

[45]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 2022 .