Robotic Simulation Training

Simulation is a critical tool in minimally invasive surgery and holds similar importance in robotic surgery. In this chapter, we review the current use and promise of simulation in robotic surgery. We begin with a review of pertinent concepts in simulation. Fidelity is the accuracy of a simulation in representing a real system. The setting of the simulation creates opportunities for and controls the parameters of the simulation. Computerization has revolutionized simulation and has led to the development of virtual reality simulators for surgical training. We then discuss various levels of simulation fidelity within practical and virtual reality. Practical models include suture boards, trainer boxes, exercises in room setup, basic console use, and in vitro and cadaveric models. Virtual reality includes visual and auditory immersion which has introduced many new tools and opportunities for robotic surgical educators, researchers, and trainees. Finally, we review assessment tools used by educators to objectively and subjectively evaluate learners in simulation-based curricula and to evaluate the simulations themselves.

[1]  Ahmed M. Zihni,et al.  FLS tasks can be used as an ergonomic discriminator between laparoscopic and robotic surgery , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  Prokar Dasgupta,et al.  Competency based training in robotic surgery: benchmark scores for virtual reality robotic simulation , 2017, BJU international.

[3]  M. Curet,et al.  Assessment of Robotic Console Skills (ARCS): construct validity of a novel global rating scale for technical skills in robotically assisted surgery , 2017, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  A. Forgione,et al.  The cutting-edge training modalities and educational platforms for accredited surgical training: A systematic review , 2017, Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

[5]  A. Kaiser,et al.  Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: towards defining criteria to the right choice , 2017, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  Dana E Brackney,et al.  Back to Reality: The Use of the Presence Questionnaire for Measurement of Fidelity in Simulation. , 2017, Journal of nursing measurement.

[7]  Laura Drudi,et al.  Validation of the da Vinci Surgical Skill Simulator across three surgical disciplines: A pilot study. , 2013, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[8]  David A. Cook,et al.  Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[9]  Lora Cavuoto,et al.  Anticipation, teamwork and cognitive load: chasing efficiency during robot-assisted surgery , 2017, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[10]  Ahmed M. Zihni,et al.  Ergonomic analysis of primary and assistant surgical roles. , 2016, The Journal of surgical research.

[11]  Dimitrios Stefanidis,et al.  Robotic suturing on the FLS model possesses construct validity, is less physically demanding, and is favored by more surgeons compared with laparoscopy , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[12]  Sejin Lee,et al.  Status and Prospects of Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Our Experience and a Review of the Literature , 2017, Gastroenterology research and practice.

[13]  H. Zeh,et al.  Mastery-Based Virtual Reality Robotic Simulation Curriculum: The First Step Toward Operative Robotic Proficiency. , 2017, Journal of surgical education.

[14]  Kevin Brown,et al.  Battle of the bots: a comparison of the standard da Vinci and the da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulator in surgical skills acquisition , 2017, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[15]  M. Caird,et al.  Core Concepts: Orthopedic Intern Curriculum Boot Camp. , 2016, Orthopedics.

[16]  N. Hubert,et al.  From dV-Trainer to Real Robotic Console: The Limitations of Robotic Skill Training. , 2017, Journal of surgical education.

[17]  A. Salles,et al.  Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery: Not Only for Senior Residents. , 2017, Journal of surgical education.

[18]  L. Panait,et al.  Do laparoscopic skills transfer to robotic surgery? , 2014, The Journal of surgical research.

[19]  G. Lee,et al.  Does a robotic surgery approach offer optimal ergonomics to gynecologic surgeons?: a comprehensive ergonomics survey study in gynecologic robotic surgery , 2017, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[20]  I. Khatkov,et al.  Comparative analysis of learning curve in complex robot-assisted and laparoscopic liver resection. , 2017, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[21]  M. Vargas,et al.  Transferability of Virtual Reality, Simulation-Based, Robotic Suturing Skills to a Live Porcine Model in Novice Surgeons: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2017, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[22]  W. Chung,et al.  Overview of robotic thyroidectomy. , 2017, Gland surgery.

[23]  R. Lord,et al.  Robot‐assisted oesophageal and gastric surgery for benign disease: antireflux operations and Heller's myotomy , 2015, ANZ journal of surgery.

[24]  R. Cotellese,et al.  Is right colectomy a complete learning procedure for a robotic surgical program? , 2018, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[25]  Ahmed M. Zihni,et al.  Operative performance outcomes of a simulator-based robotic surgical skills curriculum , 2019, Surgical Endoscopy.

[26]  Sarah B. Placek,et al.  Cost Comparison of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Training Completed With Standard Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Equipment versus Low-Cost Equipment. , 2017, Journal of surgical education.

[27]  Thenkurussi Kesavadas,et al.  Construct validation of the key components of Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery (FSRS) curriculum--a multi-institution prospective study. , 2014, Journal of surgical education.

[28]  R. Starke,et al.  Current applications and future perspectives of robotics in cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery , 2017, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[29]  K. Guru,et al.  Surgical Competency for Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy: Development and Validation of a Robotic Hysterectomy Assessment Score (RHAS). , 2017, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[30]  D. Eisenstein,et al.  Quality of Communication in Robotic Surgery and Surgical Outcomes , 2016, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[31]  Jihad H. Kaouk,et al.  Current status of robotic single-port surgery , 2017, Urology annals.

[32]  Jon C. Gould,et al.  Validation of a virtual reality-based robotic surgical skills curriculum , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[33]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Surgeon Performance Predicts Early Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. , 2017, Journal of endourology.

[34]  Karen E. Burtt,et al.  Innovations in surgery simulation: a review of past, current and future techniques. , 2016, Annals of translational medicine.

[35]  S. De,et al.  Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator , 2018, Surgical Endoscopy.

[36]  A. Tanaka,et al.  A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools. , 2017, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[37]  Vipul Patel,et al.  Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14‐society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development , 2014, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[38]  Ahmed M. Zihni,et al.  Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[39]  Simulation Model for Laparoscopic Foregut Surgery: The University of North Carolina Foregut Model , 2017 .

[40]  T. Krupski,et al.  Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill? , 2017, Journal of surgical education.