Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Group Decision-Making to Select Stand-Level Forest Management Models and Support Landscape-Level Collaborative Planning

Forest management planning is a challenge due to the diverse criteria that need to be considered in the underlying decision-making process. This challenge becomes more complex in joint collaborative management areas (ZIF) because the decision now may involve numerous actors with diverse interests, preferences, and goals. In this research, we present an approach to identifying and quantifying the most relevant criteria that actors consider in a forest management planning process in a ZIF context, including quantifying the performance of seven alternative stand-level forest management models (FMM). Specifically, we developed a combined multicriteria decision analysis and group decision-making process by (a) building a cognitive map with the actors to identify the criteria and sub-criteria; (b) structuring the decision tree; (c) structuring a questionnaire to elicit the importance of criteria and sub-criteria in a pairwise comparison process, and to evaluate the FMM alternatives; and (d) applying a Delphi survey to gather actors’ preferences. We report results from an application to a case study area, ZIF of Vale do Sousa, in North-Western Portugal. Actors assigned the highest importance to the criteria income (56.8% of all actors) and risks (21.6% of all actors) and the lowest to cultural services (27.0% of all actors). Actors agreed on their preferences for the sub-criteria of income (diversification of income sources), risks (wildfires) and cultural services (leisure and recreation activities). However, there was a poor agreement among actors on the sub-criteria of the wood demand and biodiversity criteria. For 27.0% of all actors the FMM with the highest performance was the pedunculate oak and for 43.2% of all actors the eucalypt FMM was the least preferable alternative. The findings indicate that this approach can support ZIF managers in enhancing forest management planning by improving its utility for actors and facilitating its implementation.

[1]  Marina Segura,et al.  Review: Decision support systems for forest management: A comparative analysis and assessment , 2014 .

[2]  J. Borges,et al.  Appraisal framework for actor interest and power analysis in forest management - Insights from Northern Portugal , 2020, Forest Policy and Economics.

[3]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  J. González-Pachón,et al.  Decision-Making in Forestry: A Review of the Hybridisation of Multiple Criteria and Group Decision-Making Methods , 2019, Forests.

[5]  M. Strager,et al.  Incorporating stakeholder preferences for land conservation: Weights and measures in spatial MCA , 2006 .

[6]  Eva-Maria Nordström,et al.  Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden , 2010 .

[7]  Thomas Knoke,et al.  Hybrid MCDA Methods to Integrate Multiple Ecosystem Services in Forest Management Planning: A Critical Review , 2015, Environmental Management.

[8]  C. Coelho,et al.  Forest Intervention Areas (ZIF): A New Approach for Non-Industrial Private Forest Management in Portugal , 2013 .

[9]  A. Kangas,et al.  Social choice theory and its applications in sustainable forest management—a review , 2006 .

[10]  Arif Ur Rahman,et al.  A Multiple Criteria Approach for Negotiating Ecosystem Services Supply Targets and Forest Owners' Programs , 2017 .

[11]  Erich Tasser,et al.  Comparing land-use alternatives: Using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis , 2013 .

[12]  L. Nunes,et al.  The Evolution of Climate Changes in Portugal: Determination of Trend Series and Its Impact on Forest Development , 2019, Climate.

[13]  Gene Rowe,et al.  The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects — Introduction to the special issue☆ , 2011 .

[14]  M. Buchy,et al.  Understanding public participation in forest planning: a review. , 2000 .

[15]  Concepción Maroto,et al.  Sustainable Forest Management in a Mediterranean region: social preferences , 2013 .

[16]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms , 2006 .

[17]  António Xavier,et al.  Management of Mediterranean forests — A compromise programming approach considering different stakeholders and different objectives , 2015 .

[18]  Manuela M. Oliveira,et al.  An approach to assess actors’ preferences and social learning to enhance participatory forest management planning , 2020, Trees, Forests and People.

[19]  G. Montibeller,et al.  Problem Structuring for Multicriteria Decision Analysis Interventions , 2010 .

[20]  Valerie Belton,et al.  A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services , 2015 .

[21]  Mark Colyvan,et al.  A formal model for consensus and negotiation in environmental management. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Cognitive mapping expert views for policy analysis in the public sector , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Eva-Maria Nordström,et al.  Forest decision support systems for the analysis of ecosystem services provisioning at the landscape scale under global climate and market change scenarios , 2019, European Journal of Forest Research.

[24]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[25]  Serafin Corral,et al.  Social sensitivity analysis in conflictive environmental governance: A case of forest planning , 2017 .

[26]  Heiko A. von der Gracht,et al.  Consensus measurement in Delphi studies , 2012 .

[27]  Teppo Hujala,et al.  Review. Supporting problem structuring with computer-based tools in participatory forest planning , 2013 .

[28]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: A review and an assessment , 2008 .

[29]  D. Schmoldt,et al.  Analytical Group Decision Making in Natural Resources: Methodology and Application , 2000, Forest Science.

[30]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Multiple criteria decision support in forest management: the approach, methods applied, and experiences gained , 2005 .

[31]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning , 2009 .