Curricular Interventions for Teaching Higher Order Thinking to All Students: Introduction to the Special Series

Editor's Comment: The articles in this special series on curriculum make significant contributions, first, by proposing that the curriculum employed for all students, including those with learning disabilities, should emphasize thinking, problem solving, and reasoning, a point few would disagree with, given the complexities of life in this postindustrial-information age. The authors also provide some evidence that students with learning disabilities can learn and apply sophisticated concepts, rules, and strategies. Furthermore, the authors describe one instructional process that emphasizes higher order thinking, that is, "sameness analysis." This process facilitates the integration of concepts, rules, strategies, schema, systems, heuristics, and algorithms. The authors believe that sameness analysis fosters a holistic understanding of a content area. Over the last several years this journal has contained numerous articles that cogently argued for a more holistic approach to education. Sameness analysis is one that lends itself to the holistic approach. Finally, the series of articles quite appropriately addresses the importance of efficient teaching. Some recent research indicates that students with learning disabilities may be receiving less instruction than their nonhandicapped peers-this despite the fact that they have problems in learning. Efficient teaching takes on increased importance with the recent call (by some) for increased or total integration of students with learning disabilities into general classrooms.---JLW

[1]  C. Teddlie,et al.  A Time to Summarize: The Louisiana School Effectiveness Study. , 1988 .

[2]  S. Derry Strategy and Expertise in Solving Word Problems , 1989 .

[3]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Dolores Durkin,et al.  What Classroom Observations Reveal about Reading Comprehension Instruction. Technical Report No. 106. , 1978 .

[5]  John H. Flavell,et al.  Stage-related properties of cognitive development , 1971 .

[6]  P. Feltovich Knowledge Based Components of Expertise in Medical Diagnosis. , 1981 .

[7]  Russell Gersten,et al.  Explicit Instruction in Mathematics Problem Solving , 1984 .

[8]  Zelene Lovitt Rethinking My Roots as a Teacher. , 1990 .

[9]  D. Powell Selection of reading textbooks at the district level: Is this a rational process? , 1985 .

[10]  Nancy Feyl Chavkin,et al.  Essential Elements of Strong Parent Involvement Programs. , 1989 .

[11]  John A. Ross Controlling Variables: A Meta-Analysis of Training Studies , 1988 .

[12]  Bonnie Grossen,et al.  Diagramming a Logic Strategy: Effects on Difficult Problem Types and Transfer , 1990 .

[13]  D. Herrmann,et al.  Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. , 1982 .

[14]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Beginning To Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. , 1991 .

[15]  J. Woodward,et al.  Teaching Problem Solving Through Computer Simulations , 1988 .

[17]  Edward A. Silver,et al.  Recall of Mathematical Problem Information: Solving Related Problems. , 1981 .

[18]  Barak Rosenshine,et al.  Recent Research on Teaching Behaviors and Student Achievement , 1976 .

[19]  W. A. T. White,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Direct Instruction in Special Education. , 1988 .

[20]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The Demands and Requirements of Computer Programming: A Literature Review , 1985 .

[21]  Alan M. Hofmeister,et al.  Developing and validating science education videodiscs , 1989 .

[22]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Relationship Between What Is Remembered and Creative Problem Solving Performance in Science Learning. , 1981 .

[23]  Dorothy S. Strickland,et al.  Emerging Literacy: Young Children Learn to Read and Write , 1989 .

[24]  R. Farr,et al.  The Purpose of State Level Textbook Adoption: What Does the Legislation Reveal?. , 1985 .

[25]  A. Porter,et al.  A Curriculum Out of Balance: The Case of Elementary School Mathematics. Research Series No. 191. , 1988 .

[26]  G. Edelman Neural Darwinism: The Theory Of Neuronal Group Selection , 1989 .

[27]  J. O'neil Piecing Together the Restructuring Puzzle. , 1990 .

[28]  Richard L. Allington,et al.  School Response to Reading Failure: Instruction for Chapter 1 and Special Education Students in Grades Two, Four, and Eight , 1989, The Elementary School Journal.

[29]  Douglas Carnine,et al.  Evaluating Curriculum Design in the Context of Active Teaching , 1989 .

[30]  R. Kail The development of memory in Children , 1979 .