Optimization and performance evaluation of the microPET II scanner for in vivo small-animal imaging

MicroPET II is a newly developed PET (positron emission tomography) scanner designed for high-resolution imaging of small animals. It consists of 17,640 LSO crystals each measuring 0.975 x 0.975 x 12.5 mm3, which are arranged in 42 contiguous rings, with 420 crystals per ring. The scanner has an axial field of view (FOV) of 4.9 cm and a transaxial FOV of 8.5 cm. The purpose of this study was to carefully evaluate the performance of the system and to optimize settings for in vivo mouse and rat imaging studies. The volumetric image resolution was found to depend strongly on the reconstruction algorithm employed and averaged 1.1 mm (1.4 microl) across the central 3 cm of the transaxial FOV when using a statistical reconstruction algorithm with accurate system modelling. The sensitivity, scatter fraction and noise-equivalent count (NEC) rate for mouse- and rat-sized phantoms were measured for different energy and timing windows. Mouse imaging was optimized with a wide open energy window (150-750 keV) and a 10 ns timing window, leading to a sensitivity of 3.3% at the centre of the FOV and a peak NEC rate of 235,000 cps for a total activity of 80 MBq (2.2 mCi) in the phantom. Rat imaging, due to the higher scatter fraction, and the activity that lies outside of the field of view, achieved a maximum NEC rate of 24,600 cps for a total activity of 80 MBq (2.2 mCi) in the phantom, with an energy window of 250-750 keV and a 6 ns timing window. The sensitivity at the centre of the FOV for these settings is 2.1%. This work demonstrates that different scanner settings are necessary to optimize the NEC count rate for different-sized animals and different injected doses. Finally, phantom and in vivo animal studies are presented to demonstrate the capabilities of microPET II for small-animal imaging studies.

[1]  S. Cherry,et al.  MicroPET II: design, development and initial performance of an improved microPET scanner for small-animal imaging. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  R. N. Goble,et al.  Performance evaluation of the microPET R4 PET scanner for rodents , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  R. Leahy,et al.  Model-based normalization for iterative 3D PET image reconstruction. , 2002, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[4]  R. Leahy,et al.  Model-based normalization for iterative 3D PET image reconstruction , 2002 .

[5]  J. Seidel,et al.  Resolution uniformity and sensitivity of the NIH ATLAS small animal PET scanner: comparison to simulated LSO scanners without depth-of-interaction capability , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[6]  S R Cherry,et al.  Detector development for microPET II: a 1 microl resolution PET scanner for small animal imaging. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  R. N. Goble,et al.  Performance evaluation of the microPET P4: a PET system dedicated to animal imaging. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Magdalena Rafecas,et al.  A prototype high-resolution animal positron tomograph with avalanche photodiode arrays and LSO crystals , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Y C Tai,et al.  Detector development for microPET II: a 1 μl resolution PET scanner for small animal imaging , 2001 .

[10]  S S Gambhir,et al.  Use of positron emission tomography in animal research. , 2001, ILAR journal.

[11]  S. Cherry,et al.  Evaluation of Hamamatsu R5900 series PMTs for readout of high-resolution scintillator arrays , 2000 .

[12]  T. Lewellen,et al.  Performance characteristics of micro crystal element (MiCE) detectors , 2000, 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149).

[13]  M E Phelps,et al.  Positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  Comparison of 3-D maximum a posteriori and filtered backprojection algorithms for high-resolution animal imaging with microPET , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  S. Cherry,et al.  Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  William W. Moses,et al.  Conceptual design of a high-sensitivity small animal PET camera with 4/spl pi/ coverage , 1999 .

[18]  Alan J. Fischman,et al.  Development of a small animal PET imaging device with resolution approaching 1 mm , 1999 .

[19]  D A Benaron,et al.  Imaging transgenic animals. , 1999, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[20]  A. Del Guerra,et al.  YAP-PET: first results of a small animal positron emission tomograph based on YAP:Ce finger crystals , 1998 .

[21]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Statistical image reconstruction methods for randoms-precorrected PET scans , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[22]  A. Jeavons,et al.  A 3D HIDAC-PET camera with sub-millimetre resolution for imaging small animals , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[23]  R. Leahy,et al.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  T. Watanabe,et al.  The development and the study of R5900-00-M64 for scintillating/optical fiber readout , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[25]  S Weber,et al.  The design of an animal PET: flexible geometry for achieving optimal spatial resolution or high sensitivity , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  T J Spinks,et al.  Three-dimensional performance of a small-diameter positron emission tomograph. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  T. Yamashita,et al.  A high resolution animal PET scanner using compact PS-PMT detectors , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[29]  S. Cherry,et al.  MicroPET: a high resolution PET scanner for imaging small animals , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[30]  Roger Lecomte,et al.  Initial results from the Sherbrooke avalanche photodiode positron tomograph , 1996 .

[31]  S. Cherry,et al.  Optical fiber readout of scintillator arrays using a multi-channel PMT: a high resolution PET detector for animal imaging , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[32]  Yiping Shao,et al.  Simple charge division readouts for imaging scintillator arrays using a multi-channel PMT , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[33]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .