Productivity of Noun Slots in Verb Frames

Productivity is a central concept in the study of language and language acquisition. As a test case for exploring the notion of productivity, we focus on the noun slots of verb frames, such as __want__, __see__, and __get__. We develop a novel combination of measures designed to assess both the flexibility and creativity of use in these slots. We do so using a rigorously controlled sample of child speech and child directed speech from three English-speaking children between the ages of 2-3 years and their caregivers. We find different levels of creativity and flexibility between the adult and child samples for some measures, for some slots, and for some developmental periods. We discuss these differences in the context of verb frame semantics, conventionality versus creativity and child errors, and draw some tentative conclusions regarding developmental changes in children's early grammatical representations.

[1]  Kirsten Abbot-Smith,et al.  Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition , 2006 .

[2]  Grover Hudson,et al.  PHONOLOGY AND LANGUAGE USE , 2004 .

[3]  Kirsten Abbot-Smith,et al.  Graded representations in the acquisition of English and German transitive constructions , 2008 .

[4]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[5]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  Modeling the Developmental Patterning of Finiteness Marking in English, Dutch, German, and Spanish Using MOSAIC , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account. , 2001, Journal of child language.

[7]  J. Mandler.  Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Infancy , 2000 .

[8]  R. Baayen,et al.  Shifting paradigms: gradient structure in morphology , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Bayesian Modeling of Human Concept Learning , 1998, NIPS.

[10]  HARALD BAAYEN,et al.  Productivity and English derivation: a corpus-based study , 1991 .

[11]  Virginia Valian,et al.  Abstract categories or limited-scope formulae? The case of children's determiners* , 2009, Journal of Child Language.

[12]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’ , 2002, Journal of Child Language.

[13]  J. Pine,et al.  Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[14]  Melissa Bowerman,et al.  Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development , 1982 .

[15]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech , 2003, Journal of Child Language.

[16]  Wolfgang U. Dressler.  Degrees of grammatical productivity in inflectional morphology: 1119 , 2003 .

[17]  D. O'Neill,et al.  First Language , 2009 .

[18]  Devin M. Casenhiser,et al.  Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. , 2005, Developmental science.

[19]  Virginia Valian.  Syntactic categories in the speech of young children. , 1986 .

[20]  T. Poggio.  A theory of how the brain might work. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[21]  J. Pine,et al.  Do young children have adult-like syntactic categories? Zipf’s law and the case of the determiner , 2013, Cognition.

[22]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Can input explain children's me-for-I errors?* , 2009, Journal of Child Language.

[23]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The acquisition of the active transitive construction in English: A detailed case study , 2012 .

[24]  K. Wexler.  Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage , 1998 .

[25]  K. Nelson.  Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development. , 1974 .

[26]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Rules and representations , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  Joan L. Bybee.  Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form , 1985 .

[28]  R. Jackendoff.  Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon , 1975 .

[29]  J. Pine,et al.  Subject–auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘what children do know?’ , 2000, Journal of Child Language.

[30]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Flexibility in early verb use : Evidence from a multiple-n dairy study : Vi differences in early verb growth and use as a function of developmental period, child and verb , 2009 .

[31]  Danielle E. Matthews,et al.  Children's Production of Unfamiliar Word Sequences Is Predicted by Positional Variability and Latent Classes in a Large Sample of Child-Directed Speech , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Productivity of a Polish child’s inflectional noun morphology: a naturalistic study , 2012 .

[33]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Semantics of the Transitive Construction: Prototype Effects and Developmental Comparisons , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  J. Pine,et al.  Syntactic categories in the speech of young children: the case of the determiner , 1996, Journal of Child Language.

[35]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[36]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .

[37]  T. Poggio,et al.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.

[38]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[39]  John W. Du Bois.  The Discourse Basis of Ergativity , 1987 .

[40]  Y. Shirai.  The emergence of tense-aspect morphology in Japanese: universal predisposition? , 1998 .

[41]  P. Bloom.  Subjectlees sentences in child language , 1990 .

[42]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[43]  Degrees of grammatical productivity in inflectional morphology , 2008 .

[44]  Erika Hoff,et al.  Flexibility in early verb use: evidence from a multiple-N diary study. , 2009, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[45]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series How language acquisition builds on cognitive development , 2004 .

[46]  Noam Chomsky.  Reflections on Language. , 1977 .

[47]  Diane C. Lillo-Martin,et al.  An introduction to linguistic theory and language acquisition , 1999 .

[48]  Kenneth Wexler.  Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivation in child grammar , 1992 .

[49]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Paradox lost? No, paradox found! Reply to Tomasello and Akhtar (2003) , 2003, Cognition.

[50]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Two-year-old children's production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis , 2009 .

[51]  J. Pine,et al.  Slot and frame patterns and the development of the determiner category , 1997, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[52]  Virginia Valian.  Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children , 1991, Cognition.

[53]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model: why the data on children's use of non-nominative 3psg subjects count against the ATOM , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[54]  Gert Webelhuth,et al.  Government and binding theory and the minimalist program : principles and parameters in syntactic theory , 1997 .

[55]  Katherine Nelson,et al.  Language In Cognitive Development , 1996 .

[56]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[57]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  What part of no do children not understand? A usage-based account of multiword negation , 2007, Journal of Child Language.

[58]  Cynthia Fisher,et al.  The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: a reply to Tomasello (2000) , 2002, Cognition.

[59]  José Javier Aguado-Orea,et al.  The acquisition of morpho-syntax in Spanish : implications for current theories of development , 2004 .