Abstract We consider two related questions: ‘When can a cartesian functor between toposes be factored as an inverse image functor followed by a direct image functor?’ and ‘Does every cartesian monad on a topos ∄ arise from a geometric morphism with codomain ∄?’. The connection between the two questions is that the answer to the first, in the particular case when both the domain and codomain of the functor are the topos of sets, is ‘if and only if it carries a monad structure’. We investigate the class of cartesian monads on the topos of sets, providing a new proof that they correspond bijectively to strongly zero-dimensional locales in this topos. By combining two old results on strong functors, we show that any cartesian monad on an arbitrary topos has a canonical extension to an indexed monad; this suffices to extend the arguments employed in the topos of sets to an arbitrary Boolean base topos, but we also show how they fail in non-Boolean toposes. For such toposes, the answer to the second question therefore remains unknown.
[1]
Peter T. Johnstone,et al.
Collapsed toposes and cartesian closed varieties
,
1990
.
[2]
Robert Paré,et al.
Abstract families and the adjoint functor theorems
,
1978
.
[3]
Peter T. Johnstone,et al.
Algebraic theories in toposes
,
1978
.
[4]
A. Kock.
Bilinearity and Cartesian Closed Monads.
,
1971
.
[5]
George M. Bergman,et al.
Actions of Boolean rings on sets
,
1991
.
[6]
R. J. Wood,et al.
Constructive complete distributivity. I
,
1990,
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[7]
Peter T. Johnstone,et al.
Factorization theorems for geometric morphisms, II
,
1982
.
[8]
A. Kock.
Strong functors and monoidal monads
,
1972
.
[9]
Peter T. Johnstone,et al.
Connected limits, familial representability and Artin glueing
,
1995,
Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.
[10]
Andreas Blass,et al.
Exact functors and measurable cardinals.
,
1976
.
[11]
Lynn Arthur Steen,et al.
Counterexamples in Topology
,
1970
.