Collision Probability Due to Space Debris Clouds Through a Continuum Approach

As the debris population increases, the probability of collisions in space grows. Because of the high level of released energy, even collisions with small objects may produce thousands of fragments. Propagating the trajectories of all the objects produced by a breakup could be computationally expensive. Therefore, in this work, debris clouds are modeled as a fluid, whose spatial density varies with time under the effect of atmospheric drag. By introducing some simplifying assumptions, such as an exponential model of the atmosphere, an analytical expression for the cloud density evolution in time is derived. The proposed approach enables the analysis of many potential fragmentation scenarios that would be time limited with current numerical methods that rely on the integration of all the fragments’ trajectories. In particular, the proposed analytical method is applied to evaluate the consequences of some recent breakups on a list of target objects. In addition, collision scenarios with different initial co...

[1]  C. Pardini,et al.  MODELLING THE SPACE DEBRIS EVOLUTION : TWO NEW COMPUTER , 1995 .

[2]  Donald J. Kessler,et al.  Derivation of the collision probability between orbiting objects: the lifetimes of jupiter's outer moons , 1981 .

[3]  A. B. Jenkin,et al.  Dilution of Disposal Orbit Collision Risk for the Medium Earth Orbit Constellations , 2005 .

[4]  P H Krisko.  The predicted growth of the low-Earth orbit space debris environment — an assessment of future risk for spacecraft , 2007 .

[5]  D. McKnight.  A phased approach to collision hazard analysis , 1990 .

[6]  Joshua Ashenberg.  Formulas for the phase characteristics in the problem of low-Earth-orbital debris , 1994 .

[7]  D. King-hele,et al.  Book-Review - Satellite Orbits in an Atmosphere - Theory and Applications , 1987 .

[8]  Alan B. Jenkin.  Probability of collision during the early evolution of debris clouds , 1996 .

[9]  F. Kenneth Chan,et al.  Spacecraft Collision Probability , 2008 .

[10]  Nicholas L. Johnson,et al.  Orbital Debris: the Growing Threat to Space Operations , 2010 .

[11]  N. Johnson,et al.  NASA's new breakup model of evolve 4.0 , 2001 .

[12]  D. Vallado.  Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications , 1997 .

[13]  Alessandro Rossi,et al.  Analysis of the consequences of fragmentations in low and geostationary orbits , 2016 .

[14]  E. Opik,et al.  COLLISION PROBABILITIES WITH THE PLANETS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF INTERPLANETARY MATTER , 2016 .

[15]  R McinnesC,et al.  An Analytical Model for the Catastrophic Production of Orbital Debris. , 1993 .

[16]  J. Liou,et al.  Outcome of recent satellite impact experiments , 2009 .

[17]  S.-Y. Su,et al.  Contribution of explosion and future collision fragments to the orbital debris environment , 1985 .

[18]  H. Lewis,et al.  Small Debris Fragments Contribution to Collision Probability for Spacecraft in Low Earth Orbits , 2015 .

[19]  Adam E. White,et al.  The many futures of active debris removal , 2014 .

[20]  Ruediger Jehn.  Dispersion of debris clouds from on-orbit fragmentation events , 1990 .

[21]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Analytical Model for the Propagation of Small-Debris-Object Clouds After Fragmentations , 2015 .

[22]  H. Klinkrad,et al.  Operational Collision Avoidance with Regard to Catalog Objects , 2006 .

[24]  Donald J. Kessler,et al.  Collision probability at low altitudes resulting from elliptical orbits , 1990 .

[25]  Colin R. McInnes,et al.  Wave-like patterns in an elliptical satellite ring , 2013 .

[26]  Mark V. Sykes,et al.  Zodiacal dust bands - Their relation to asteroid families , 1989 .

[27]  H. Klinkrad.  Space Debris: Models and Risk Analysis , 2006 .

[28]  D. King-hele,et al.  Satellite orbits in an atmosphere : theory and applications , 1987 .