Stakeholder Perceptions of Seaport Resilience Strategies: A Case Study of Gulfport (Mississippi) and Providence (Rhode Island)

Climate change is having and will continue to have a range of negative impacts on social–environmental systems. Many ports, with their coastal locations and essential roles in regional and national economies, face particular exposure to storm impacts that may worsen with climate change. Currently in the United States port resilience planning falls primarily on port operators. Engaging a wider range of stakeholders in long-term seaport functioning may reduce risks from disruptive and potentially irreversible impacts of climate change. This study uses empirical data gathered through two case studies of highly exposed U.S. ports, Gulfport (MS) and Providence (RI), to identify strategies that port planners and external stakeholders consider feasible for enhancing their port's resilience. This article categorizes these resilience strategies and suggests the potential role that different stakeholders could play in facilitation and implementation.

[1]  Megan Elberts.  AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS. , 1937, Science.

[2]  C. Brodsky.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[3]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[4]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[5]  R. Goss,et al.  Economic policies and seaports: The economic functions of seaports , 1990 .

[6]  R. Kates,et al.  Global Change in Local Places: How Scale Matters , 1999 .

[7]  David W. Cash,et al.  Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes , 2000 .

[8]  Dan Ward,et al.  Stakeholder involvement in transport planning: participation and power , 2001 .

[9]  Elvira Haezendonck,et al.  Essays on Strategy Analysis for Seaports , 2001 .

[10]  Simon Shackley,et al.  Stakeholder Perceptions of Climate Change Impacts at the Regional Scale: Implications for the Effectiveness of Regional and Local Responses , 2002 .

[11]  J. Bryson.  What to do when Stakeholders matter , 2004 .

[12]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[13]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  The Performance of Seaport Clusters; A Framework to Analyze Cluster Performance and an Application to the Seaport Clusters of Durban, Rotterdam and the Lower Mississippi , 2004 .

[14]  Gregory P. Tsinker,et al.  Port engineering : planning, construction, maintenance, and security , 2004 .

[15]  J. Field.  Rethinking the relationship , 2005, Social Capital and Lifelong Learning.

[16]  Institutional change in the Port of New York , 2005 .

[17]  David Salt,et al.  Resilience Thinking : Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World , 2017 .

[18]  Amy Luers,et al.  Assessing the Vulnerability of Social-Environmental Systems , 2006 .

[19]  Gene Rowe,et al.  Perceptions of food risk management among key stakeholders: Results from a cross-European study , 2006, Appetite.

[20]  K. Brown,et al.  Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion , 2007 .

[21]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[22]  T. Notteboom,et al.  Port master planning: balancing stakeholders' interests , 2007 .

[23]  Stephen A. Curtis.  Hurricane Katrina damage assessment : Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi ports and coasts , 2007 .

[24]  A. Vafeidis,et al.  Worst case scenario as stakeholder decision support: a 5- to 6-m sea level rise in the Rhone delta, France , 2008 .

[25]  Roger Few,et al.  Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Ports in Proximity: Competition and Coordination among Adjacent Seaports , 2009 .

[27]  W. Travis.  Going to extremes: propositions on the social response to severe climate change , 2009 .

[28]  B. Riley,et al.  EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY , 2009 .

[29]  R. Kates,et al.  America's Climate Choices: Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change , 2010 .

[30]  Peter Hall,et al.  Shifting Proximities: The Maritime Ports Sector in an Era of Global Supply Chains , 2010 .

[31]  Susanne C. Moser,et al.  Now more than ever: The need for more societally relevant research on vulnerability and adaptation to climate change , 2010 .

[32]  G. Vecchi,et al.  Modeled Impact of Anthropogenic Warming on the Frequency of Intense Atlantic Hurricanes , 2010, Science.

[33]  Susanne C Moser,et al.  A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Colorado Colorado,et al.  AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS , 2010 .

[35]  A. Becker,et al.  Climate change impacts on international seaports: knowledge, perceptions, and planning efforts among port administrators , 2011, Climatic Change.

[36]  S. Cheong.  Policy solutions in the U.S. , 2011 .

[37]  S. Josey.  Climate change impacts , 2012 .

[38]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis , 2012 .

[39]  T. Stocker,et al.  Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. , 2012 .

[40]  R. Kates,et al.  Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Susanne C. Moser,et al.  Successful adaptation in climate change : linking science and policy in a rapidly changing world , 2013 .

[42]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Fostering knowledge networks for climate adaptation , 2013 .

[43]  Susanne C. Moser,et al.  Navigating the Political and Emotional Terrain of Adaptation: Community Engagement When Climate Change Comes Home Chapter in: Moser, S.C. and M.T. Boykoff (eds.). Successful Adaptation to Climate Change: Linking Science and Policy in a Rapidly Changing World. Routledge, London, pp.289-305. , 2013 .

[44]  M. McNutt.  Climate Change Impacts , 2013, Science.

[45]  Rosalind J. Cornforth,et al.  Building climate resilience: Lessons of early warning in Africa , 2013 .

[46]  E. Stancioff,et al.  Reframing Engagement Methods for Climate Change Adaptation , 2013 .

[47]  Hongjian Zhou,et al.  Rethinking the relationships of vulnerability, resilience, and adaptation from a disaster risk perspective , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[48]  S. Rahmstorf,et al.  A note on climate change adaptation for seaports: a challenge for global ports, a challenge for global society , 2013, Climatic Change.

[49]  R. Nicholls,et al.  Future flood losses in major coastal cities , 2013 .

[50]  S. Jevrejeva,et al.  Projected Atlantic hurricane surge threat from rising temperatures , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  its Impacts,et al.  Abrupt Impacts of Climate Change: Anticipating Surprises , 2014 .

[52]  G. Yohe,et al.  Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment , 2014 .

[53]  George Sugihara,et al.  Abrupt Impacts of Climate Change: Anticipating Surprises , 2014 .

[54]  Benjamin P. Horton,et al.  Expert assessment of sea-level rise by AD 2100 and AD 2300 , 2014 .

[55]  Austin Becker,et al.  Towards seaport resilience for climate change adaptation: Stakeholder perceptions of hurricane impacts in Gulfport (MS) and Providence (RI) , 2015 .

[56]  P. Morris.  Stakeholder Perceptions of Climate Change: Impacts on Forest Products Markets, Habitats, and Economies in Vulnerable Coastal Communities. , 2017 .

[57]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .