Predictors of rear seat belt use among U.S. adults, 2012.

INTRODUCTION Seat belt use reduces the risk of injuries and fatalities among motor vehicle occupants in a crash, but belt use in rear seating positions is consistently lower than front seating positions. Knowledge is limited concerning factors associated with seat belt use among adult rear seat passengers. METHODS Data from the 2012 ConsumerStyles survey were used to calculate weighted percentages of self-reported rear seat belt use by demographic characteristics and type of rear seat belt use enforcement. Multivariable regression was used to calculate prevalence ratios for rear seat belt use, adjusting for person-, household- and geographic-level demographic variables as well as for type of seat belt law in place in the state. RESULTS Rear seat belt use varied by age, race, geographic region, metropolitan status, and type of enforcement. Multivariable regression showed that respondents living in states with primary (Adjusted Prevalence Ratio (APR): 1.23) and secondary (APR: 1.11) rear seat belt use enforcement laws were significantly more likely to report always wearing a seat belt in the rear seat compared with those living in a state with no rear seat belt use enforcement law. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Several factors were associated with self-reported seat belt use in rear seating positions. Evidence suggests that primary enforcement covering all seating positions is an effective intervention that can be employed to increase seat belt use and in turn prevent motor vehicle injuries to rear-seated occupants.

[1]  Ruth A Shults,et al.  Associations between sociodemographics and safety belt use in states with and without primary enforcement laws. , 2007, American journal of public health.

[2]  Laurie F Beck,et al.  Geographic and sociodemographic variation in self-reported seat belt use in the United States. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Dipan Bose,et al.  Increased risk of driver fatality due to unrestrained rear-seat passengers in severe frontal crashes. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Tony Jianqiang Ye,et al.  Occupant restraint use in 2009: results from the National Occupant Protection Use Survey Controlled Intersection Study. , 2010, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  S. Wakai,et al.  Mortality of front-seat occupants attributable to unbelted rear-seat passengers in car crashes , 2002, The Lancet.

[6]  Peter Cummings,et al.  Passenger seating position and the risk of passenger death or injury in traffic crashes. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Peter Cummings,et al.  Association of rear seat safety belt use with death in a traffic crash: a matched cohort study , 2007, Injury Prevention.

[8]  James Mayrose,et al.  Influence of the unbelted rear-seat passenger on driver mortality: "the backseat bullet". , 2005, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[9]  Julie Brown,et al.  A matched-cohort analysis of belted front and rear seat occupants in newer and older model vehicles shows that gains in front occupant safety have outpaced gains for rear seat occupants. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  J. Mayrose,et al.  The Safest Seat: Effect of Seating Position on Occupant Mortality , 2006 .

[11]  Ruth A Shults,et al.  Seat belt use in States and territories with primary and secondary laws--United States, 2006. , 2009, Journal of safety research.

[12]  Richard Kent,et al.  Rear-seat motor vehicle travel in the U.S.: using national data to define a population at risk. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.