Reverberation of rapid and slow trills: implications for signal adaptations to long-range communication.

Many acoustic signals in animals include trills, i.e., rapid repetitions of similar elements. Elements within these trills usually are frequency modulated and are degraded by reverberation during long-range transmission. Reverberation primarily affects consecutive elements with the same frequency characteristics and thus imposes a major constraint in the evolution of design and perception of long-range signals containing trills. Here transmission of frequency-unmodulated trills with different element repetition rates was studied. Trills were generated at different frequencies to assess frequency dependence of reverberation and then broadcast under three acoustic conditions--an open field and to assess seasonal changes in transmission properties, a deciduous forest before and after foliage had emerged. Reverberation was quantified at different positions within trills. The results show strong effects of vegetation density (season), transmission distance, frequency, element repetition rate, and element position within the trill on effects of reverberation. The experiments indicate that fast trills transmit less well than slow trills and thus are less effective in long-range communication. They show in particular that selection on trills should not act only on element repetition rate within trills but also on the trill duration as effects of reverberation increased with trill duration.

[1]  M. Ryan,et al.  The transmission of advertisement calls in Central American frogs , 2000 .

[2]  R. Wiley,et al.  Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  Jeffrey Podos,et al.  A PERFORMANCE CONSTRAINT ON THE EVOLUTION OF TRILLED VOCALIZATIONS IN A SONGBIRD FAMILY (PASSERIFORMES: EMBERIZIDAE) , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  Time resolution of acoustic signals by birds , 1975, Nature.

[5]  Marc Naguib.  Ranging By Song in Carolina Wrens Thryothorus Ludovicianus: Effects of Environmental Acoustics and Strength of Song Degradation , 1996 .

[6]  A. D. Little,et al.  Spectral Content as a Cue to Perceived Auditory Distance , 1992, Perception.

[7]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Auditory distance assessment of singing conspecifies in Carolina wrens: the role of reverberation and frequency-dependent attenuation , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Estimating the distance to a source of sound: mechanisms and adaptations for long-range communication , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Laurene M. Ratcliffe,et al.  SONG DEGRADATION AND ESTIMATION OF ACOUSTIC DISTANCE IN BLACK-CAPPED CHICKADEES (PARUS ATRICAPILLUS) , 1995 .

[10]  R. H. Wiley,et al.  Reverberations and Amplitude Fluctuations in the Propagation of Sound in a Forest: Implications for Animal Communication , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Habitat‐induced degradation of sound signals: Quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal‐to‐noise ratio in blackbird song , 1993 .

[12]  Charles H. Brown,et al.  Habitat acoustics and primate communication , 1986, American journal of primatology.

[13]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  POTENTIAL RANGING CUES CONTAINED WITHIN THE ENERGETIC PAUSES OF TRANSMITTED WREN SONG , 2001 .

[14]  E. Morton.  Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[15]  G. Klump,et al.  Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs , 1987, Nature.

[16]  P. Handford,et al.  SOUND DESIGN FOR VOCALIZATIONS: QUALITY IN THE WOODS, CONSISTENCY IN THE FIELDS , 2000 .

[17]  R. H. Wiley.  Associations of Song Properties with Habitats for Territorial Oscine Birds of Eastern North America , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Georg M. Klump,et al.  Assessment of auditory distance in a territorial songbird: accurate feat or rule of thumb? , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Bernhard Ronacher,et al.  Neurophysiological Aspects of Song Pattern Recognition and Sound Localization in Grasshoppers , 1994 .

[20]  Marc Naguib.  Ranging of songs in Carolina wrens: effects of familiarity with the song type on use of different cues , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Degradation of wren Troglodytes troglodytes song: Implications for information transfer and ranging , 1998 .

[22]  A. Leitão,et al.  GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION IN BLUE TIT SONG, THE RESULT OF AN ADJUSTMENT TO VEGETATION TYPE? , 1999 .

[23]  Enrique T. Segura,et al.  Geographic variation in the song of the rufous-collared sparrow in Eastern Argentina , 1993 .

[24]  D. Mershon,et al.  Intensity and reverberation as factors in the auditory perception of egocentric distance , 1975 .

[25]  Robert J. Dooling,et al.  4 – Auditory Perception in Birds , 1982 .

[26]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  Ranging of conspecific songs by Kentucky warblers and its implications for interactions of territorial males , 1996 .

[27]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  5 – Adaptations for Acoustic Communication in Birds: Sound Transmission and Signal Detection , 1982 .

[28]  Detection of gaps in noise by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Poephila guttata) , 1990, Hearing Research.

[29]  M. Lambrechts,et al.  Macrogeographic Variation in Song – a Test of Competition and Habitat Effects in Blue Tits , 2001 .

[30]  Marc Naguib.  Ranging of songs with the song type on use of different cues in Carolina wrens: effects of familiarity , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.