Explanation-Giving in a Collaborative Tangible Tabletop Game: Initiation, Positionality, Valence, and Action-Orientation

Explanations given to each other by 20 pairs of 5th grade children while playing a tangible tabletop sustainability game were analyzed inductively for key themes relating to their use of language, gesture and system tools. Half the pairs had been assigned roles (human development or natural resources manager) with associated system controls. Findings showed that explanations by pairs in both conditions often employed collectivist language (“we”) in conjunction with positive reflections on the game-world state using the provided Impact Tool which gave feedback while system was paused. Pairs in the roles condition also gave explanations in response to partner actions and more frequently included negative and actionoriented prospective language about what should be changed moving forward. Roles pairs additionally used questions to seek confirmation or action from their partner and made comments from the perspective of the inhabitants of the fictional world. Implications for the research and design of collaborative tabletop learning systems are discussed.

[1]  Victor R. Lee.  Learning technologies and the body : integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments , 2015 .

[2]  Stephanie D. Teasley.  Talking about reasoning : How important is the peer in peer collaboration? , 1997 .

[3]  William Gibson,et al.  Working with Qualitative Data , 2009, QMiP Bulletin.

[4]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  Exploring How Tangible Tools Enable Collaboration in a Multi-touch Tabletop Game , 2011, INTERACT.

[5]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Fighting for control: children's embodied interactions when using physical and digital representations , 2009, CHI.

[6]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Interactive tabletops in education , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[7]  M. Chi,et al.  Dialogue Patterns in Peer Collaboration That Promote Learning , 2015 .

[8]  Ricki Goldman,et al.  Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics , 2010 .

[9]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  A New Conceptual Framework for CSCL , 2003, CSCL.

[10]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Youtopia: a collaborative, tangible, multi-touch, sustainability learning activity , 2013, IDC.

[11]  Emma Mercier,et al.  Multi-touch tables and the relationship with collaborative classroom pedagogies: A synthetic review , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[12]  J. G. Tanenbaum,et al.  Futura: design for collaborative learning and game play on a multi-touch digital tabletop , 2010, TEI.

[13]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Exploring How a Co-dependent Tangible Tool Design Supports Collaboration in a Tabletop Activity , 2014, GROUP.

[14]  Alissa N. Antle,et al.  Scratching the Surface: Opportunities and Challenges from Designing Interactive Tabletops for Learning , 2014 .

[15]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Actions speak loudly with words: unpacking collaboration around the table , 2009, ITS '09.

[16]  Jakob Tholander,et al.  Finding design qualities in a tangible programming space , 2006, CHI.

[17]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Children designing together on a multi-touch tabletop: an analysis of spatial orientation and user interactions , 2009, IDC.

[18]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Towards more precise design guidance: specifying and testing the functions of assigned student roles in online discussions , 2012 .

[19]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Getting Down to Details: Using Theories of Cognition and Learning to Inform Tangible User Interface Design , 2013, Interact. Comput..

[20]  F. Fischer,et al.  A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[22]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  What kind of world do you want to live in?: Positive interdependence and collaborative processes in the land-use planning game "Youtopia." , 2015 .

[23]  Alissa N. Antle,et al.  Games for Change: Looking at Models of Persuasion Through the Lens of Design , 2014 .