Acoustic Emission Experiments of Rock Failure Under Load Simulating the Hypocenter Condition

A series of acoustic emission (AE) experiments of rock failure have been conducted under cyclic load in tri-axial stress tests. To simulate the hypocenter condition the specimens are loaded by the combined action of a constant stress, intended to simulate the tectonic loading, and a small sinusoidal disturbance stress, analogous to the Earth tide induced by the Sun and the Moon. Each acoustic emission signal can indicate the occurrence time, location and relative magnitude of the damage (micro-crack) in the specimen. The experimental results verified some precursors such as LURR (Load/Unload Response Ratio) and AER (Accelerating Energy Release) before macro-fracture of the samples. A new parameter, the correlation between the AE and the load, has been proposed to describe the loading history. On the eve of some strong earthquakes the correlation between the Benioff strain and the Coulomb failure stress (CFS) decreases, similar to the variation of LURR prior to strong earthquakes.

[1]  John B. Rundle,et al.  A physical model for earthquakes: 1. Fluctuations and interactions , 1988 .

[2]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Complex Critical Exponents from Renormalization Group Theory of Earthquakes: Implications for Earthquake Predictions , 1995 .

[3]  J. Rundle.  A physical model for earthquakes: 2. Application to southern California , 1988 .

[4]  David J. Varnes,et al.  Predictive modeling of the seismic cycle of the Greater San Francisco Bay Region , 1993 .

[5]  Dion Weatherley,et al.  Long-range Automaton Models of Earthquakes: Power-law Accelerations, Correlation Evolution, and Mode-switching , 2002 .

[6]  D. Lockner.  The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture , 1993 .

[7]  P. Mora,et al.  Spatio-temporal Scanning and Statistical Test of the Accelerating Moment Release (AMR) Model Using Australian Earthquake Data , 2003 .

[8]  Ruth A. Harris,et al.  Introduction to Special Section: Stress Triggers, Stress Shadows, and Implications for Seismic Hazard , 1998 .

[9]  D. Turcotte,et al.  Micro and macroscopic models of rock fracture , 2003 .

[10]  Yujie Wei,et al.  Critical Sensitivity and Trans-scale Fluctuations in Catastrophic Rupture , 2002 .

[11]  Y. Ben‐Zion,et al.  Distributed damage, faulting, and friction , 1997 .

[12]  D. Sornette,et al.  An observational test of the critical earthquake concept , 1998 .

[13]  John B. Rundle,et al.  Geocomplexity and the Physics of Earthquakes , 2000 .

[14]  Dion Weatherley,et al.  Load-Unload Response Ratio and Accelerating Moment/Energy Release Critical Region Scaling and Earthquake Prediction , 2002 .

[15]  D. Lockner,et al.  Why earthquakes correlate weakly with the solid Earth tides: Effects of periodic stress on the rate and probability of earthquake occurrence , 2003 .

[16]  D. Sornette,et al.  Earthquake rupture as a critical point: consequences for telluric precursors , 1990 .

[17]  Yi-long Bai,et al.  Critical Sensitivity in Driven Nonlinear Threshold Systems , 2004 .

[18]  Peter Mora,et al.  Stress Correlation Function Evolution in Lattice Solid Elasto-dynamic Models of Shear and Fracture Zones and Earthquake Prediction , 2002 .

[19]  P. Reasenberg,et al.  Response of Regional Seismicity to the Static Stress Change Produced by the Loma Prieta Earthquake , 1992, Science.

[20]  J. C. Jaeger,et al.  Fundamentals of rock mechanics , 1969 .

[21]  Xiang-Chu Yin,et al.  The Precursor of Instability for Nonlinear Systems and Its Application to Earthquake Prediction—The Load‐Unload Response Ratio Theory , 2013 .

[22]  Xiang-Chu Yin,et al.  Development of a New Approach to Earthquake Prediction: Load/Unload Response Ratio (LURR) Theory , 2000 .

[23]  Xiang-Chu Yin,et al.  A new approach to earthquake prediction: The Load/Unload Response Ratio (LURR) theory , 1995 .

[24]  T. Levshina,et al.  Increased long‐range intermediate‐magnitude earthquake activity prior to strong earthquakes in California , 1996 .

[25]  George D. Garland,et al.  Quo vadimus : geophysics for the next generation , 1990 .

[26]  John B. Rundle,et al.  A physical model for earthquakes: 3. Thermodynamical approach and its relation to nonclassical theories of nucleation , 1989 .

[27]  John B. Rundle,et al.  Derivation of the complete Gutenberg‐Richter magnitude‐frequency relation using the principle of scale invariance , 1989 .

[28]  Yehuda Ben-Zion,et al.  Accelerated Seismic Release and Related Aspects of Seismicity Patterns on Earthquake Faults , 2001 .

[29]  Peter Mora,et al.  Lattice solid simulation of the physics of fault zones and earthquakes: The model, results and directions. , 2000 .

[30]  白以龙,et al.  Critical Sensitivity and Trans-Scale Fluctuations in Catastrophic Rupture , 2002 .

[31]  D. Sornette,et al.  Testing self‐organized criticality by induced seismicity , 1998, cond-mat/9810190.

[32]  D. Lockner,et al.  Quasi-static fault growth and shear fracture energy in granite , 1991, Nature.

[33]  Didier Sornette.  Mean-field solution of a block-spring model of earthquakes , 1992 .

[34]  Stuart P. Nishenko,et al.  Seismicity trends and potential for large earthquakes in the Alaska-Aleutian region , 1994 .

[35]  John B. Rundle,et al.  Physical Basis for Statistical Patterns in Complex Earthquake Populations: Models, Predictions and Tests , 1999 .

[36]  D. Sornette,et al.  Precursors, aftershocks, criticality and self-organized criticality , 1998 .

[37]  C. Sammis,et al.  Seismic Cycles and the Evolution of Stress Correlation in Cellular Automaton Models of Finite Fault Networks , 1999 .

[38]  D. Turcotte,et al.  Precursory Seismic Activation and Critical-point Phenomena , 2000 .

[39]  M. Johnston,et al.  Absence of earthquake correlation with Earth tides: An indication of high preseismic fault stress rate , 1998 .