High Resolution Light Microscopic Evaluation of Boar Semen Quality Sperm Cytoplasmic Droplet Retention in Relationship with Boar Fertility Parameters

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between fertility and quantitative measures of boar semen quality, including various patterns of sperm cytoplasmic droplet (CD) retention, as determined by high power differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy. A total of 116 ejaculates were collected from a nucleus herd of 18 Large White boars over an eight month period. Semen quality parameters were analyzed for each ejaculate by calculating the percentage of normal spermatozoa, spermatozoa possessing a CD in the proximal, distal, or distal midpiece reflex position, total spermatozoa with an attached cytoplasmic droplet, spermatozoa with non-CD related aberrations and total spermatozoa with abnormalities. Of the 116 ejaculates received, 71 ejaculates from 13 boars had corresponding fertility data from single-sire inseminations of multiparous sows. The fertility data included farrowing rate (FR) and total number born (TNB). The monthly FR encompassed one month before and one month after the date of semen collection. Detection of differences for fertility and semen quality parameters was performed by separating the boars into either an above-average or below-average group based on the mean FR (74.01 ± 1.43%) or TNB (12.34 ± 0.17) for the study. For FR, the boars in the below-average group had a significantly lower percentage of normal spermatozoa and significantly higher percentage of spermatozoa possessing distal CDs, total attached CDs and total abnormalities compared to the boars in the above-average group. Conversely, for TNB there were no significant differences between the above- and below-average groups for the semen quality parameters. These data suggest that the attached CD may negatively affect FR, but not TNB. The detection of relationships between the boar fertility parameters and the retention of the sperm CD after ejaculation, document the advantage of high power DIC microscopy in conventional semen evaluation.

[1]  P. Sutovsky,et al.  Arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase and ubiquitin as fertility markers in boars. , 2007, Theriogenology.

[2]  M. Yeste,et al.  Effects of a high semen-collection frequency on the quality of sperm from ejaculates and from six epididymal regions in boars. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[3]  J. Gadea,et al.  The predictive value of porcine seminal parameters on fertility outcome under commercial conditions. , 2004, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[4]  M. Yeste,et al.  Semen quality of postpubertal boars during increasing and decreasing natural photoperiods. , 2004, Theriogenology.

[5]  R. Hess,et al.  Immunofluorescence reveals ubiquitination of retained distal cytoplasmic droplets on ejaculated porcine spermatozoa. , 2004, Journal of andrology.

[6]  W. Flowers,et al.  Variability in relationships between semen quality and estimates of in vivo and in vitro fertility in boars. , 2004, Animal reproduction science.

[7]  G C Althouse,et al.  Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm. , 2004, Theriogenology.

[8]  R. Shanks,et al.  The relationship of porcine sperm zona-binding ability to fertility. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[9]  G. Bloom,et al.  On the ultrastructure and development of the protoplasmic droplet of spermatozoa , 1961, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.

[10]  E. Lin,et al.  Effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the 5'-flanking region of heat shock protein 70.2 gene on semen quality in boars. , 2002, Animal reproduction science.

[11]  W. Flowers.  Increasing fertilization rate of boars: Influence of number and quality of spermatozoa inseminated , 2002 .

[12]  A G Braundmeier,et al.  The search is on: finding accurate molecular markers of male fertility. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  A. Petrunkina,et al.  Selective sperm binding to pig oviductal epithelium in vitro. , 2001, Reproduction.

[14]  J. Thundathil,et al.  The use of in vitro fertilization techniques to investigate the fertilizing ability of bovine sperm with proximal cytoplasmic droplets. , 2001, Animal reproduction science.

[15]  G. Seidel,et al.  Fertilizing potential in vitro of semen from young beef bulls containing a high or low percentage of sperm with a proximal droplet. , 2000, Theriogenology.

[16]  E. Lin,et al.  Association of heat shock protein 70 with semen quality in boars. , 2000, Animal reproduction science.

[17]  M. A. Akbarsha,et al.  Retention of cytoplasmic droplet by rat cauda epididymal spermatozoa after treatment with cytotoxic and xenobiotic agents. , 2000, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[18]  C. Kuster,et al.  The fecundity of porcine semen stored for 2 to 6 days in Androhep and X-CELL extenders. , 1999, Theriogenology.

[19]  L. Rydhmer,et al.  Photoperiodic effects on pubertal maturation of spermatogenesis, pituitary responsiveness to exogenous GnRH, and expression of boar taint in crossbred boars. , 1998, Animal reproduction science.

[20]  G. Althouse.  Cytoplasmic droplets on boar sperm cells , 1998 .

[21]  S. Kato,et al.  Timing of Shedding and Disintegration of Cytoplasmic Droplets from Boar and Goat Spermatozoa , 1996 .

[22]  M. Miyake,et al.  Fructose stimulates shedding of cytoplasmic droplets from epididymal boar spermatozoa. , 1996, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[23]  R. Aitken,et al.  Free radicals, lipid peroxidation and sperm function. , 1995, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[24]  S. Meding,et al.  Fertility of long-term-stored boar semen: Influence of extender (Androhep and Kiev), storage time and plasma droplets in the semen , 1994 .

[25]  D. Lunstra,et al.  Semen characteristics, testicular size, and reproductive hormone concentrations in mature duroc, meishan, fengjing, and minzhu boars. , 1993, Biology of reproduction.

[26]  S. Kato,et al.  Influence of season on characteristics of epididymal and ejaculated semen in Meishan boars. , 1992, Theriogenology.

[27]  S. Bonet.  Immature and aberrant spermatozoa in the ejaculate of Sus domesticus , 1990 .

[28]  L. Malmgren,et al.  Semen Quality and Fertility After Heat Stress in Boars , 1984, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[29]  M. Ottinger,et al.  Morphological changes in chicken and turkey spermatozoa incubated under various conditions. , 1984, Poultry science.

[30]  L. Russell.  Spermiation — the sperm release process: Ultrastructural observations and unresolved problems , 1984 .

[31]  K. Larsson,et al.  Sperm morphology and in vitro viability in diluted semen in relation to fertility of AI boars. , 1980, Nordisk veterinaermedicin.