A Comparison of Stand-Level Volume Estimates from Image-Based Canopy Height Models of Different Spatial Resolutions

Digital aerial photogrammetry has recently attracted great attention in forest inventory studies, particularly in countries where airborne laser scanning (ALS) technology is not available. Further research, however, is required to prove its practical applicability in deriving three-dimensional (3D) point clouds and canopy surface and height models (CSMs and CHMs, respectively) over different forest types. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the applicability of image-based CHMs at different spatial resolutions (1 m, 2 m, 5 m) for use in stand-level forest inventory, with a special focus on estimation of stand-level merchantable volume of even-aged pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) forests. CHMs are generated by subtracting digital terrain models (DTMs), derived from the national digital terrain database, from corresponding digital surface models (DSMs), derived by the process of image matching of digital aerial images. Two types of stand-level volume regression models are developed for each CHM resolution. The first model is based solely on stand-level CHM metrics, whereas in the second model, easily obtainable variables from forest management databases are included in addition to CHM metrics. The estimation accuracies of the stand volume estimates based on stand-level metrics (relative root mean square error RMSE% = 12.53%–13.28%) are similar or slightly higher than those obtained from previous studies in which stand volume estimates were based on plot-level metrics. The inclusion of stand age as an independent variable in addition to CHM metrics improves the accuracy of the stand volume estimates. Improvements are notable for young and middle-aged stands, and negligible for mature and old stands. Results show that CHMs at the three different resolutions are capable of providing reasonably accurate volume estimates at the stand level.

[1]  D. Lu.  The potential and challenge of remote sensing‐based biomass estimation , 2006 .

[2]  References , 1971 .

[3]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Comparing ALS and Image-Based Point Cloud Metrics and Modelled Forest Inventory Attributes in a Complex Coastal Forest Environment , 2015 .

[4]  J. Durbin,et al.  Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. I. , 1950, Biometrika.

[5]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  The Structure, Distribution, and Biomass of the World's Forests , 2013 .

[6]  Alberto García-Martín,et al.  Use of low point density ALS data to estimate stand-level structural variables in Mediterranean Aleppo pine forest , 2016 .

[7]  E. Næsset,et al.  Laser scanning of forest resources: the nordic experience , 2004 .

[8]  M. Čater.  A 20-Year Overview of Quercus robur L. Mortality and Crown Conditions in Slovenia , 2015 .

[9]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Performance of dense digital surface models based on image matching in the estimation of plot-level forest variables , 2013 .

[10]  E. Næsset,et al.  Comparison of four types of 3D data for timber volume estimation , 2014 .

[11]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Retrieval of Forest Aboveground Biomass and Stem Volume with Airborne Scanning LiDAR , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[12]  John Ignatius Griffin,et al.  Statistics; methods and applications , 1963 .

[13]  P. Snowdon,et al.  A ratio estimator for bias correction in logarithmic regressions , 1991 .

[14]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Airborne laser scanning and digital stereo imagery measures of forest structure: comparative results and implications to forest mapping and inventory update , 2013 .

[15]  Hrvoje Marjanović,et al.  Quality assessment of high density digital surface model over different land cover classes , 2016, Periodicum Biologorum.

[16]  I. Thompson,et al.  An Operational framework for defining and monitoring forest degradation , 2013 .

[17]  Crystal Schaaf,et al.  Forest Canopy Cover and Height From MISR in Topographically Complex Southwestern US Landscapes Assessed With High Quality Reference Data , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[18]  J. Durbin,et al.  Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. II. , 1950, Biometrika.

[19]  Jorge García-Gutiérrez,et al.  Comparison of ALS based models for estimating aboveground biomass in three types of Mediterranean forest , 2016 .

[20]  Thomas Hill.  Statistics: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[21]  K. Moffett,et al.  Remote Sens , 2015 .

[22]  C. Stepper,et al.  Using semi-global matching point clouds to estimate growing stock at the plot and stand levels: application for a broadleaf-dominated forest in central Europe , 2015 .

[23]  D. Sprugel,et al.  Correcting for Bias in Log‐Transformed Allometric Equations , 1983 .

[24]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[25]  E. Næsset,et al.  Comparing biophysical forest characteristics estimated from photogrammetric matching of aerial images and airborne laser scanning data , 2015 .

[26]  D. J. Finney.  On the Distribution of a Variate Whose Logarithm is Normally Distributed , 1941 .

[27]  Jörgen Wallerman,et al.  Forest variable estimation using photogrammetric matching of digital aerial images in combination with a high-resolution DEM , 2012 .

[28]  Marko Debeljak,et al.  Modelling forest growing stock from inventory data: A data mining approach , 2014 .

[29]  Demetrios Gatziolis,et al.  Modeling Forest Aboveground Biomass and Volume Using Airborne LiDAR Metrics and Forest Inventory and Analysis Data in the Pacific Northwest , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[30]  Alexander Hinz,et al.  DMC – The Digital Sensor Technology of Z/I-Imaging , 2006 .

[31]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[32]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Remote Sensing Technologies for Enhancing Forest Inventories: A Review , 2016 .

[33]  S. Solberg,et al.  Forest Parameter Prediction Using an Image-Based Point Cloud: A Comparison of Semi-ITC with ABA , 2015 .

[34]  Lars T. Waser,et al.  High‐quality image matching and automated generation of 3D tree models , 2008 .

[35]  E. Næsset.  Area-Based Inventory in Norway – From Innovation to an Operational Reality , 2014 .

[36]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Using remotely sensed data to construct and assess forest attribute maps and related spatial products , 2010 .

[37]  B. St-Onge,et al.  Characterizing the Height Structure and Composition of a Boreal Forest Using an Individual Tree Crown Approach Applied to Photogrammetric Point Clouds , 2015 .

[38]  G. Baskerville.  Use of Logarithmic Regression in the Estimation of Plant Biomass , 1972 .

[39]  Jason W. Osbourne,et al.  Four Assumptions of Multiple Regression That Researchers Should Always Test. , 2002 .

[40]  S. Popescu.  Estimating biomass of individual pine trees using airborne lidar , 2007 .

[41]  K. Steinmann,et al.  Small area estimations of proportion of forest and timber volume combining Lidar data and stereo aerial images with terrestrial data , 2013 .

[42]  Lars T. Waser,et al.  Potential of UltraCamX stereo images for estimating timber volume and basal area at the plot level in mixed European forests , 2013 .

[43]  Johan E. S. Fransson,et al.  Forest Variable Estimation Using Radargrammetric Processing of TerraSAR-X Images in Boreal Forests , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[44]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Enriching ALS-Derived Area-Based Estimates of Volume through Tree-Level Downscaling , 2015 .

[45]  Sakari Tuominen,et al.  Forest variable estimation using a high-resolution digital surface model , 2012 .

[46]  F. Schumacher.  Logarithmic expression of timber-tree volume , 1933 .

[47]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Comparison of Laser and Stereo Optical, SAR and InSAR Point Clouds from Air- and Space-Borne Sources in the Retrieval of Forest Inventory Attributes , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[48]  H. Olsson,et al.  Data Assimilation in Forest Inventory: First Empirical Results , 2015 .

[49]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Outlook for the Next Generation’s Precision Forestry in Finland , 2014 .

[50]  J. Holmgren,et al.  The potential of digital surface models based on aerial images for automated vegetation mapping , 2015 .

[51]  Joanne C. White,et al.  The Utility of Image-Based Point Clouds for Forest Inventory: A Comparison with Airborne Laser Scanning , 2013 .

[52]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Assessing 3D point clouds from aerial photographs for species-specific forest inventories , 2017 .

[53]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Using semi-global matching point clouds to estimate growing stock at the plot and stand levels : application for a broadleaf-dominated forest in central Europe , 2014 .

[54]  Paul S. Johnson,et al.  The Ecology and Silviculture of Oaks , 2002 .

[55]  D. Pitt,et al.  A Comparison of Point Clouds Derived from Stereo Imagery and Airborne Laser Scanning for the Area-Based Estimation of Forest Inventory Attributes in Boreal Ontario , 2014 .