Evidence for time-based models of free recall

Is memory temporally organized? According to temporal distinctiveness models of memory, temporally isolated items should be better remembered than temporally crowded items in free recall tasks. Here, we tested this class of model by varying the temporal isolation of items either predictably (Experiment 1) or unpredictably (Experiment 2) in a free recall task. In both experiments, item recall probability increased as a function of the temporal gaps both before and after the item. The results are taken as support for temporal distinctiveness models of memory, in which items are represented and recalled in terms of their positions along a temporal dimension.

[1]  M C Corballis.  Memory span as a function of variable presentation speeds and stimulus durations. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  Rehearsal and decay in immediate recall of visually and aurally presented items. , 1966 .

[3]  K. Laughery,et al.  Short-term memory: The effects of inter-item time distribution and recall procedure. , 1971 .

[4]  R. Bjork,et al.  Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall☆ , 1974 .

[5]  R. G. Crowder.  Principles of learning and memory , 1977 .

[6]  J. Rönnberg.  Predictability as a task demand in single-trial free recall. , 1980 .

[7]  Predictability and recall strategy for nominal serial position curves. , 1981 .

[8]  A. Glenberg,et al.  A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Michael Wilson,et al.  MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .

[10]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Schedules of presentation and temporal distinctiveness in human memory. , 1990 .

[11]  I. Neath.  Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[12]  M. Kahana.  Associative retrieval processes in free recall , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[13]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Distinctiveness and very short-term serial position effects. , 1996, Memory.

[14]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Positional Distinctiveness and the Ratio Rule in Free Recall , 1997 .

[15]  Marc W Howard,et al.  Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  D. Laming.  Testing the Idea of Distinct Storage Mechanisms in Memory , 1999 .

[17]  R. Henson.  Positional information in short-term memory: Relative or absolute? , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[18]  G. Ward,et al.  A recency-based account of the primacy effect in free recall. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  G D Brown,et al.  Oscillator-based memory for serial order. , 2000, Psychological review.

[20]  Marc W. Howard,et al.  A distributed representation of temporal context , 2002 .

[21]  M. Maybery,et al.  Grouping in short-term verbal memory: Is position coded temporally? , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  M. Usher,et al.  The demise of short-term memory revisited: empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. , 2005, Psychological review.

[23]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Serial recall and presentation schedule: A micro‐analysis of local distinctiveness , 2005, Memory.

[24]  Lisa M. Nimmo,et al.  From brief gaps to very long pauses: temporal isolation does not benefit serial recall. , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Timeless memory: Evidence against temporal distinctiveness models of short-term memory for serial order , 2006 .

[26]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Distinctiveness revisited: Unpredictable temporal isolation does not benefit short-term serial recall of heard or seen events , 2006, Memory & cognition.