Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating ecotoxicity Data (CRED): comparison and perception of the Klimisch and CRED methods for evaluating reliability and relevance of ecotoxicity studies

[1]  I. Werner,et al.  Erratum to: Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating ecotoxicity Data (CRED): comparison and perception of the Klimisch and CRED methods for evaluating reliability and relevance of ecotoxicity studies , 2016, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[2]  Michael St J Warne,et al.  Evaluation of Criteria Used to Assess the Quality of Aquatic Toxicity Data , 2005, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[3]  Ketil Hylland,et al.  Detection of endocrine disrupters: evaluation of a Fish Sexual Development Test (FSDT). , 2006, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.

[4]  U. Tillmann,et al.  A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. , 1997, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[5]  Marlene Ågerstrand,et al.  CRED: Criteria for reporting and evaluating ecotoxicity data , 2016, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[6]  Mensink Bjwg,et al.  Manual for summarising and evaluating environmental aspects of plant protection products , 2008 .

[7]  I. Ebert,et al.  Regulatory demands on data quality for the environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals. , 2009, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[8]  Mike Roberts,et al.  Principles of sound ecotoxicology. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  D. Calamari,et al.  Effects of erythromycin, tetracycline and ibuprofen on the growth of Synechocystis sp. and Lemna minor. , 2004, Aquatic toxicology.

[10]  Division on Earth.  Review of Epa's Integrated Risk Information System (Iris) Process , 2014 .

[11]  Claire Robinson,et al.  Risk assessment's insensitive toxicity testing may cause it to fail. , 2014, Environmental research.

[12]  Marion Dolezel,et al.  Are Limits of Concern a useful concept to improve the environmental risk assessment of GM plants? , 2017, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[13]  Marlene Ågerstrand,et al.  Comparison of four different methods for reliability evaluation of ecotoxicity data: a case study of non-standard test data used in environmental risk assessments of pharmaceutical substances , 2011 .

[14]  M. Egger,et al.  The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. , 1999, JAMA.

[15]  A. Küster,et al.  The CHMP guideline on environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use: Three years of regulatory experience , 2009 .

[16]  Ryan Thompson,et al.  A New Quality Assurance System for the Evaluation of Ecotoxicity Studies Submitted Under the New Substances Notification Regulations in Canada , 2009, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[17]  M. T. Dinis,et al.  Dietary neutral lipid level and source in Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) larvae: effect on growth, lipid metabolism and digestive capacity. , 2006, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[18]  Shirong Gao,et al.  Toxicity of the new pyrethroid insecticide, deltamethrin, to Daphnia magna , 1989, Hydrobiologia.

[19]  C Rudén,et al.  Reporting and evaluation criteria as means towards a transparent use of ecotoxicity data for environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[20]  K. Burkiewicz,et al.  Toxicity of Three Insecticides in a Standard Algal Growth Inhibition Test with Scenedesmus subspicatus , 2005, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[21]  Judi L. Durda,et al.  Data Quality Evaluation of Toxicological Studies Used to Derive Ecotoxicological Benchmarks , 2000 .

[22]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data. , 2009, Toxicology letters.

[23]  Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) , 1996 .

[24]  F. Lahnsteiner,et al.  The effect of 4-nonylphenol on semen quality, viability of gametes, fertilization success, and embryo and larvae survival in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). , 2005, Aquatic toxicology.

[25]  Takanori Nakamura,et al.  A novel method using cyanobacteria for ecotoxicity test of veterinary antimicrobial agents , 2007, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[26]  Good Laboratory Practices: Myers et al. Respond , 2009, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[27]  Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment , 2008 .

[28]  T. Woodruff,et al.  Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Published Animal Studies: A Systematic Review , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[29]  Richard A. Becker,et al.  Good Laboratory Practices and Safety Assessments , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[30]  S. Lambert,et al.  Assessment of the risk posed by the antifouling booster biocides Irgarol 1051 and diuron to freshwater macrophytes. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[31]  Marlene Ågerstrand,et al.  Bad Reporting or Bad Science? Systematic Data Evaluation as a Means to Improve the Use of Peer-Reviewed Studies in Risk Assessments of Chemicals , 2014 .

[32]  It Istituto Superiore di Sanit,et al.  Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document on euthrophication assessment in the context of European water policies. (Technical report 2009-030; Guidance document 23) , 2009 .

[33]  Anna Beronius,et al.  Facilitating the use of non‐standard in vivo studies in health risk assessment of chemicals: a proposal to improve evaluation criteria and reporting , 2014, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[34]  R. Länge,et al.  Kriterien zur Bewertung der Qualität und Validität von toxikologischen und ökotoxikologischen Studien für regulatorische Fragestellungen , 2006 .

[35]  CAS-No.  Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive and its , 2003 .

[36]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .