A conceptual framework for exploring transitions to decarbonised energy systems in the United Kingdom

Drawing upon ‘transitions theory’ and a typology which produces five types of transitions, we describe and analyse the changes that have taken place in the United Kingdom's energy system over the past several decades in terms of three of these transition pathways, namely reproduction (e.g. incremental improvements in energy efficiency), transformation (e.g. more directed efforts towards energy efficiency gains, e.g., through voluntary and compulsory standards-setting processes) and substitution (e.g. the shift from coal to natural gas). Looking into the future, and drawing upon a programme of UK-based research which covered a wide range of potential new supply technologies and changes on the demand side, we identify the key drivers of change, including economic and commercial, technological, policy and regulatory imperatives. This analysis opens up the prospect for two further transition pathways to become manifest. These are: de-alignment/re-alignment (e.g. shift from conventional coal to coal technologies with carbon dioxide capture and storage) and re-configuration (e.g. integrating renewables within buildings and the possible emergence of the ‘hydrogen economy’). We conclude with a discussion of the opportunities for policy learning and experimentation consistent with transitions theory to facilitate the deployment of more sustainable energy systems.

[1]  H. Herring Does energy efficiency save energy? The debate and its consequences , 1999 .

[2]  Vladimir M Wolpert Environmental policy and industrial innovation: Strategies in Europe, the US and Japan: David Wallace The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London and Earthscan Publications Ltd, June 1995, 304 pp , 1996 .

[3]  S. Rayner,et al.  Human choice and climate change. Volume 2: Resources and technology , 1997 .

[4]  G. Stoker Transforming Local Governance , 2003, Government Beyond the Centre.

[5]  Halina Szejnwald Brown,et al.  Bounded Socio-Technical Experiments (BSTEs): Higher Order Learning for Transitions Towards Sustainable Mobility , 2004 .

[6]  I. Miles,et al.  The new service economy : the transformation of employment in industrial societies , 1984 .

[7]  S. Lohmann,et al.  Clumsy solutions for a complex world : the case of climate change , 2006 .

[8]  Nancy Reichman,et al.  Ozone Connections: Expert Networks in Global Environmental Governance , 2002 .

[9]  W. Walker,et al.  Nuclear entrapment : THORP and the politics of commitment , 1999 .

[10]  Steve Rayner,et al.  Risk and Governance Part I: The Discourses of Climate Change , 1998, Government and Opposition.

[11]  Carly McLachlan,et al.  The public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: results from focus groups and a survey , 2004 .

[12]  D. Meadows,et al.  The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. , 1972 .

[13]  Clair Gough,et al.  Carbon Capture and its Storage: An Integrated Assessment , 2006 .

[14]  F. Geels Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective , 2005 .

[15]  K. Green,et al.  System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy , 2005 .

[16]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Understanding System Innovations: A Critical Literature Review and a Conceptual Synthesis , 2004 .

[17]  Stephen Rayner,et al.  Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World , 2006 .

[18]  P. Sabatier Theories of the Policy Process , 1999 .

[19]  Jim Watson,et al.  Co-provision in sustainable energy systems: the case of micro-generation , 2004 .

[20]  Gregory C. Unruh Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[21]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries , 2003 .

[22]  Paul Dewick,et al.  Innovation in construction: A European analysis , 2004 .

[23]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Non-linearity and Expectations in Niche-Development Trajectories: Ups and Downs in Dutch Biogas Development (1973–2003) , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[24]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[25]  R. Gross,et al.  UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures , 2005 .

[26]  M. Borowitzka Limits to Growth , 1998 .

[27]  F. Geels Co-evolution of technology and society: The transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850-1930)—a case study in multi-level perspective , 2005 .

[28]  Jim Watson,et al.  Constructing Success in the Electric Power Industry: Flexibility and the Gas Turbine , 2001 .

[29]  Gordon MacKerron,et al.  Nuclear power and the characteristics of `ordinariness'--the case of UK energy policy , 2004 .

[30]  Peter S. Hofman Innovation and Institutional Change. The transition to a sustainable electricity system , 2005 .

[31]  C. Lindblom THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[32]  J. Ausubel,et al.  Technological Trajectories and the Human Environment , 1997 .

[33]  F. Geels Technological Transitions And System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary And Socio-technical Analysis , 2005 .

[34]  Simon Shackley,et al.  Decarbonising the UK: Energy for a Climate Conscious Future , 2005 .

[35]  Charlotte Kelly,et al.  The hydrogen economy: its long term role in greenhouse gas reduction , 2004 .

[36]  Jim Watson,et al.  Selection environments, flexibility and the success of the gas turbine , 2004 .

[37]  S. Sorrell The contribution of energy service contracting to a low carbon economy , 2005 .

[38]  Ângela Guimarães Pereira,et al.  Public Participation in Sustainability Science: Contexts of citizen participation , 2003 .

[39]  Mark Winskel,et al.  When Systems are Overthrown , 2002 .

[40]  William C. Clark,et al.  Public Participation in Sustainability Science: Frontmatter , 2003 .

[41]  U. Cantner,et al.  Change, transformation and development , 2003 .

[42]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Managing the Transition to Sustainable Mobility , 2004 .