Automatic latent value determination

Latent fingerprints are the most frequently encountered and reliable crime scene evidence used in forensics investigations. Automatic methods for quantitative assessment of a latent in terms of (i) value for individualization (VID), (ii) value for exclusion only (VEO), and (iii) no value (NV), are needed to minimize the workload of latent examiners so that they can pay more attention to challenging prints (VID and NV latents). Current value determination is either made by examiners or predicted given manually annotated features. Because both of these approaches depend on human markup, they are subjective and time consuming. We propose a fully automatic method for latent value determination based on the number, reliability, and compactness of the minutiae, ridge quality, ridge flow, and the number of core and delta points. Given the small number of latents with VEO and NV labels in two latent databases available to us (NIST SD27 and WVU), only a two-class value determination is considered, namely VID and VID̅, where the VID̅ class contains VEO and NV latents. Experimental results show that the value determination by the proposed method (i) obviates the need for examiner markup while maintaining the accuracy of value determination and (ii) can predict the AFIS performance better than examiners.

[1]  David R. Ashbaugh,et al.  Quantitative-Qualitative Friction Ridge Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Ridgeology , 1999 .

[2]  Johannes Kotzerke,et al.  Identification Performance of Evidential Value Estimation for Fingermarks , 2015, 2015 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG).

[3]  Sabih H. Gerez,et al.  Systematic Methods for the Computation of the Directional Fields and Singular Points of Fingerprints , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  On Latent Fingerprint Image Quality , 2012, IWCF.

[5]  R. A. Hicklin,et al.  ELFT-EFS Evaluation of Latent Fingerprint Technologies: Extended Feature Sets [Evaluation #2] , 2011 .

[6]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Segmentation and Enhancement of Latent Fingerprints: A Coarse to Fine RidgeStructure Dictionary , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  R. A. Hicklin,et al.  Repeatability and Reproducibility of Decisions by Latent Fingerprint Examiners , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  Richa Singh,et al.  Automated clarity and quality assessment for latent fingerprints , 2013, 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[9]  R. A. Hicklin,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Latent orientation field estimation via convolutional neural network , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Biometrics (ICB).

[11]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Adaptive flow orientation-based feature extraction in fingerprint images , 1995, Pattern Recognit..

[12]  R. A. Hicklin,et al.  Understanding the sufficiency of information for latent fingerprint value determinations. , 2013, Forensic science international.

[13]  JoAnn Buscaglia,et al.  Review of the Scientific Basis for Friction Ridge Comparisons as a Means of Identification: Committee Findings and Recommendations , 2006 .

[14]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Fingerprint Image Enhancement: Algorithm and Performance Evaluation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  Josef Bigün,et al.  Localization of corresponding points in fingerprints by complex filtering , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[16]  Eryun Liu,et al.  Fingerprint matching by incorporating minutiae discriminability , 2011, 2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB).

[17]  Christoph Busch,et al.  Predicting Dactyloscopic Examiner Fingerprint Image Quality Assessments , 2015, 2015 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG).

[18]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  LFIQ: Latent fingerprint image quality , 2013, 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).