Effect of Dynamic PET Scaling with LAI and Aspect on the Spatial Performance of a Distributed Hydrologic Model

The spatial heterogeneity in hydrologic simulations is a key difference between lumped and distributed models. Not all distributed models benefit from pedo-transfer functions based on the soil properties and crop-vegetation dynamics. Mostly coarse-scale meteorological forcing is used to estimate only the water balance at the catchment outlet. The mesoscale Hydrologic Model (mHM) is one of the rare models that incorporate remote sensing data, i.e., leaf area index (LAI) and aspect, to improve the actual evapotranspiration (AET) simulations and water balance together. The user can select either LAI or aspect to scale PET. However, herein we introduce a new weight parameter, “alphax”, that allows the user to incorporate both LAI and aspect together for potential evapotranspiration (PET) scaling. With the mHM code enhancement, the modeler also has the option of using raw PET with no scaling. In this study, streamflow and AET are simulated using the mHM in The Main Basin (Germany) for the period of 2002–2014. The additional value of PET scaling with LAI and aspect for model performance is investigated using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) AET and LAI products. From 69 mHM parameters, 26 parameters are selected for calibration using the Optimization Software Toolkit (OSTRICH). For calibration and evaluation, the KGE metric is used for water balance, and the SPAEF metric is used for evaluating spatial patterns of AET. Our results show that the AET performance of the mHM is highest when using both LAI and aspect indicating that LAI and aspect contain valuable spatial heterogeneity information from topography and canopy (e.g., forests, grasslands, and croplands) that should be preserved during modeling. This is key for agronomic studies like crop yield estimations and irrigation water use. The additional “alphax” parameter makes the model physically more flexible and robust as the model can decide the weights according to the study domain.

[1]  Qin Zhang,et al.  Response of Water Radiation Utilization of Summer Maize to Planting Density and Genotypes in the North China Plain , 2022, Agronomy.

[2]  J. Hervás,et al.  European Soil Data Centre 2.0: Soil data and knowledge in support of the EU policies , 2022, European Journal of Soil Science.

[3]  Chong-yu Xu,et al.  Joint Effects of the DEM Resolution and the Computational Cell Size on the Routing Methods in Hydrological Modelling , 2022, Water.

[4]  S. Stisen,et al.  Climate Normalized Spatial Patterns of Evapotranspiration Enhance the Calibration of a Hydrological Model , 2022, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Simon Stisen,et al.  Spatial Patterns in Actual Evapotranspiration Climatologies for Europe , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[6]  K. Chun,et al.  The Grass Is Not Always Greener on the Other Side: Seasonal Reversal of Vegetation Greenness in Aspect‐Driven Semiarid Ecosystems , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[7]  R. Paradiso,et al.  Light response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of rose leaves in the canopy profile: the effect of lighting on the adaxial and the abaxial sides. , 2020, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[8]  Samar Sakr,et al.  Toward a snow melt prediction map of Mount Lebanon , 2019, InterCarto. InterGIS.

[9]  P. Jones,et al.  An Ensemble Version of the E‐OBS Temperature and Precipitation Data Sets , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[10]  Julian Koch,et al.  The SPAtial EFficiency metric (SPAEF): multiple-component evaluation of spatial patterns for optimization of hydrological models , 2018 .

[11]  Juliane Mai,et al.  Combining satellite data and appropriate objective functions for improved spatial pattern performance of a distributed hydrologic model , 2017 .

[12]  Marvin E. Jensen,et al.  Evaporation, Evapotranspiration, and Irrigation Water Requirements , 2016 .

[13]  Heejun Chang,et al.  Effects of runoff sensitivity and catchment characteristics on regional actual evapotranspiration trends in the conterminous US , 2013 .

[14]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Evapotranspiration estimation methods in hydrological models , 2013, Journal of Geographical Sciences.

[15]  Sabine Attinger,et al.  The effects of spatial discretization and model parameterization on the prediction of extreme runoff characteristics , 2010 .

[16]  S. Attinger,et al.  Multiscale parameter regionalization of a grid‐based hydrologic model at the mesoscale , 2010 .

[17]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling , 2009 .

[18]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Large-scale runoff routing with an aggregated network-response function. , 2009 .

[19]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Evaluation of global optimization algorithms for parameter calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model , 2009 .

[20]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Application of temporal streamflow descriptors in hydrologic model parameter estimation , 2005 .

[21]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information , 1998 .

[22]  Q. J. Wang The Genetic Algorithm and Its Application to Calibrating Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Models , 1991 .

[23]  J. Harlin Development of a Process Oriented Calibration Scheme for the HBV Hydrological Model , 1991 .

[24]  George Kuczera,et al.  On the validity of first-order prediction limits for conceptual hydrologic models , 1988 .

[25]  M. Demirel,et al.  On the Utility of Remotely Sensed Actual ET and LAI in Hydrologic Model Calibration , 2022, Teknik Dergi.

[26]  Sabine Attinger,et al.  Multiscale and Multivariate Evaluation of Water Fluxes and States over European River Basins , 2016 .

[27]  Hiederer Roland Mapping Soil Properties for Europe – Spatial Representation of Soil Database Attributes , 2013 .

[28]  J. Monteith Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[29]  David R. Dawdy,et al.  Mathematical Models of Catchment Behavior , 1965 .