Natural history of cervical neoplasia: consistent results obtained by an identification technique.

Swedish population-based incidence and mortality rates for cancer of the uterine cervix, both in situ and invasive, during the period 1958 to 1981 were determined by means of a dynamic model. This new approach describes without any preconceptions the development of the disease as a sequential process over the stages cancer in situ, invasive cancer before and after diagnosis, and death. The strong disturbance of the steady-state situation that occurred after the introduction of cytological mass screening in the early 1960s permitted the use of a computerized identification technique. The whole natural history of cervical cancer could thus be identified and described consistently, with the mutual compatibility between statistical data, structure, parameters, and the states and flows between the states. The estimated age-specific incidence of cancer in situ increased rapidly to a maximum of 650 per 10(5) woman-years at the age of 30 years, after which it declined, and that of invasive cancer to a maximum of 55 per 10(5) at the age of 43. The natural history of cervical neoplasia did not differ appreciably between eight successive 5-year birth cohorts. The proportion of cases of new cancer in situ that progressed to invasive cancer was 12.2%, with a mean duration of the in situ stage in these cases of 13.3 years. The preclinical phase of the invasive stage (without screening) lasted on average about 4 years.

[1]  J. E. Dunn The relationship between carcinoma in situ and invasive cervical carcinoma. A consideration of the contributions to the problem to be made from general population data , 1953, Cancer.

[2]  A. Proudfoot,et al.  CANCER OF THE UTERINE CERVIX , 1957, The Ulster Medical Journal.

[3]  O. Petersen Spontaneous course of cervical precancerous conditions. , 1956, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  J. Bailar Uterine cancer in Connecticut: late deaths among 5-year survivors. , 1961, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  C. T. Javert The natural history of cancer of the cervix. , 1961, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  J.Edward Hall,et al.  Diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic Bases , 1962 .

[7]  D. Boyes,et al.  Significance of in situ Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix , 1962, British medical journal.

[8]  Alexander L. Pugh,et al.  Dynamo user's manual , 1963 .

[9]  D. Ashley EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF TWO FORMS OF CERVICAL CARCINOMA , 1966, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.

[10]  J. E. Dunn,et al.  Morphogenesis of cervical cancer. Findings from San Diego County Cytology Registry , 1967, Cancer.

[11]  D. Boyes,et al.  CERVICAL CANCER DETECTION IN BRITISH COLUMBIA , 1968 .

[12]  J. Clayton,et al.  An analysis of the prevalence and incidence of gynecologic cancer cytologically detected in a population of 175,767 women. , 1970, Acta cytologica.

[13]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972 .

[14]  J. E. Dunn,et al.  The duration of intraepithelial and preclinical squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1970, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  M. B. Fiering,et al.  Mathematical Models for Screening , 1973 .

[16]  L. Coppleson,et al.  Estimation of the screening error rate from the observed detection rates in repeated cercival cytology. , 1974, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  P. Eykhoff System Identification Parameter and State Estimation , 1974 .

[18]  I. I. Kessler Perspectives on the epidemiology of cervical cancer with special reference to the herpesvirus hypothesis. , 1974, Cancer research.

[19]  L. Coppleson,et al.  Observations on a model of the biology of carcinoma of the cervix: a poor fit between observation and theory. , 1975, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  COSTS OF DETECTING AND TREATING CANCER OF THE UTERINE CERVIX IN NORTH-EAST SCOTLAND IN 1971 , 1975, The Lancet.

[21]  D. Penner Cervical cancer screening programs. , 1976, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[22]  R. Richart,et al.  A statistical model of the natural history of cervical neoplastic disease: the duration of carcinoma in situ. , 1978, Gynecologic oncology.

[23]  M. Hakama,et al.  EPIDEMIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR TWO COMPONENTS OF CERVICAL CANCER , 1981, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[24]  A. Albert Estimated cervical cancer disease state incidence and transition rates. , 1981, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  D. Parkin,et al.  Incidence and prevalence of preclinical carcinoma of cervix in a British population , 1982, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[26]  A. Miller,et al.  Optimising the age, number of tests, and test interval for cervical screening in Canada. , 1982, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[27]  A. Miller,et al.  A cohort study of cervical cancer screening in British Columbia. , 1982, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[28]  G. Draper,et al.  Changing patterns of cervical cancer rates. , 1983, British medical journal.

[29]  J. H. Pearson Cervical cancer screening programs. , 1983, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[30]  R. Bourne,et al.  Invasive carcinoma of the cervix in Queensland Change in incidence and mortality, 1959‐1980 , 1983, The Medical journal of Australia.

[31]  A. D. Roberts Changing patterns of cervical cancer rates , 1983 .

[32]  J. Chamberlain Failures of the cervical cytology screening programme. , 1984, British medical journal.

[33]  K. R. Peel,et al.  Cervical smear histories of 500 women with invasive cervical cancer in Yorkshire. , 1984, British medical journal.

[34]  B Mattsson,et al.  Completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register. Non-notified cancer cases recorded on death certificates in 1978. , 1984, Acta radiologica. Oncology.

[35]  G. Draper,et al.  Trends in cervical cancer and carcinoma in situ in Great Britain. , 1984, British Journal of Cancer.

[36]  P C Prorok,et al.  Evaluation of screening programmes for gynaecological cancer. , 1985, British Journal of Cancer.

[37]  I. Duncan,et al.  SCREENING FOR CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA IN DUNDEE AND ANGUS 1962-81 AND ITS RELATION WITH INVASIVE CERVICAL CANCER , 1985, The Lancet.

[38]  D. Parkin A computer simulation model for the practical planning of cervical cancer screening programmes. , 1985, British Journal of Cancer.

[39]  F. Pettersson,et al.  Evaluation of screening for cervical cancer in Sweden: trends in incidence and mortality 1958-1980. , 1985, International journal of epidemiology.

[40]  Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. IARC Working Group on evaluation of cervical cancer screening programmes. , 1986, British medical journal.

[41]  D M Parkin,et al.  An evaluation of screening policies for cervical cancer in England and Wales using a computer simulation model. , 1986, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[42]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[43]  N. Day,et al.  TRENDS IN MORTALITY FROM CERVICAL CANCER IN THE NORDIC COUNTRIES: ASSOCIATION WITH ORGANISED SCREENING PROGRAMMES , 1987, The Lancet.