Enhancing coal seam gas using liquid CO2 phase-transition blasting with cross-measure borehole

Abstract The efficiency of gas drainage in deep coal seams is generally poor because of their typically low-gas permeability and high-geostress characteristics. Therefore, we conducted a test study on the permeability enhancement of cross-measure boreholes using liquid CO2 phase-transition blasting (LCPTB) to identify an effective method for enhancing coalbed methane reservoir. Through a numerical simulation of LCPTB, the fracture propagation in the coal seam after blasting was analysed. Subsequently, a field test arrangement for boreholes of LCPTB was designed, and the range of enhanced permeability after blasting as well as the efficiency of gas drainage were investigated. The results indicate a significant increase in the permeability of the coal seam and the efficiency of gas drainage following LCPTB. The amount of gas extracted from the blast holes was 1.8–8 times greater than that extracted from boreholes without LCPTB. The practical spacing between boreholes was deemed to be 2.5–3 m. In addition, with decreasing measuring distance from the blast hole, the efficiency of LCPTB was improved by increasing the permeability of the coal mass surrounding the observation hole. The observation holes arranged around the blasting holes could increase the efficiency of gas drainage. In summary, this technology uses the energy released by LCPTB to increase the permeability of the coal surrounding the blast hole, and to displace methane in the coal seam, thereby improving the efficiency of gas drainage and providing economic and environmental benefits.

[1]  Wang Rui-xin Analysis of a Liquid CO_2 Tank Explosion on a Ship , 2010 .

[2]  C. M. White,et al.  Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide in Coal with Enhanced Coalbed Methane RecoveryA Review , 2005 .

[3]  Guozhong Hu,et al.  Adjacent seam pressure-relief gas drainage technique based on ground movement for initial mining phase of longwall face , 2015 .

[4]  Courtney L. Busch,et al.  Evaluation of Appropriate Material Models in LS-DYNA for MM-ALE Finite Element Simulations of Small-Scale Explosive Airblast Tests on Clay Soils , 2017 .

[5]  G. Yin,et al.  Experimental study on seepage properties, AE characteristics and energy dissipation of coal under tiered cyclic loading , 2017 .

[6]  Xu Jia-lin,et al.  Green mining of coal resources harmonizing with environment , 2007 .

[7]  E. Uhlmann,et al.  Dry-ice blasting for cleaning: process, optimization and application , 1999 .

[8]  Liang Bin,et al.  Seepage coupling model of in-seam gas extraction and its applications , 2014 .

[9]  Xiao-gang Fan,et al.  Mathematical Model of Coalbed Gas Flow with Klinkenberg Effects in Multi-Physical Fields and its Analytic Solution , 2009 .

[10]  Zhu Hongqing,et al.  Application of CO2 Blasting Permeability Improvement Technology in Gas Pre-drainage Test , 2017 .

[11]  André Faaij,et al.  Potential for CO2 sequestration and enhanced coalbed methane production in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[12]  G. Yin,et al.  Geomechanical and flow properties of coal from loading axial stress and unloading confining pressure tests , 2015 .

[13]  P. Ranjith,et al.  CH4–CO2 gas exchange and supercritical CO2 based hydraulic fracturing as CBM production-accelerating techniques: A review , 2017 .

[14]  Yong Qin,et al.  Mechanism of CO2 enhanced CBM recovery in China: a review , 2008 .

[15]  Huabei Liu,et al.  Finite Element Simulation of Medium-Range Blast Loading Using LS-DYNA , 2015 .

[16]  S. Rahman,et al.  Numerical simulation and parametric analysis for designing High Energy Gas Fracturing , 2018 .

[17]  T. Moore,et al.  Coalbed methane: A review , 2012 .

[18]  Y. Cinar,et al.  Injecting pure N2 and CO2 to coal for enhanced coalbed methane: Experimental observations and numerical simulation , 2013 .

[19]  Eric Robeck,et al.  A more accurate method for estimating in situ coal density and mineral matter from ash and specific energy determinations , 2016 .

[20]  Wang Yong,et al.  Study on determining of the mechanical parameters of rock mass used in numerical simulation , 2003 .

[21]  Yu-kun Du,et al.  Determination of Rock-Breaking Performance of High-Pressure Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Jet , 2012 .

[22]  S. P. Singh,et al.  Non-explosive applications of the PCF concept for underground excavation , 1998 .

[23]  Zhou Fubao On theoretical and modeling approach to mining-enhanced permeability for simultaneous exploitation of coal and gas , 2013 .

[24]  Vikram Vishal,et al.  In-situ disposal of CO2: Liquid and supercritical CO2 permeability in coal at multiple down-hole stress conditions , 2017 .

[25]  Peng Nie,et al.  Identification of Tool Wear Condition Based on Generalized Fractal Dimensions and BP Neural Network Optimized with Genetic Algorithm , 2013 .

[26]  P. Vankerckhoven Co2 Blasting in Europe , 1995 .

[27]  D. J. Reddish,et al.  The relation between in situ and laboratory rock properties used in numerical modelling , 1997 .

[28]  Gensheng Li,et al.  MECHANISM STUDY ON ROCK BREAKING WITH SUPERCRITICAL CARBON DIOXIDE JET , 2017 .

[29]  Xiangjun Chen,et al.  Increasing permeability of coal seams using the phase energy of liquid carbon dioxide , 2017 .