Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] N. Kleckner,et al. ATR Homolog Mec1 Promotes Fork Progression, Thus Averting Breaks in Replication Slow Zones , 2002, Science.
[2] F. Melchior,et al. Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[3] S. Mirkin,et al. Replisome stalling and stabilization at CGG repeats, which are responsible for chromosomal fragility , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[4] G. Sutherland. Fragile sites on human chromosomes: demonstration of their dependence on the type of tissue culture medium. , 1977, Science.
[5] G. Fink,et al. DNA rearrangements associated with a transposable element in yeast , 1980, Cell.
[6] T. Glover,et al. ATR Regulates Fragile Site Stability , 2002, Cell.
[7] Philipp Stelter,et al. Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation , 2003, Nature.
[8] L. Johnston,et al. Getting started: regulating the initiation of DNA replication in yeast. , 1997, Annual review of microbiology.
[9] Junjie Chen,et al. BRCA1 participates in DNA decatenation , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[10] Stephen J. Elledge,et al. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53 , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.
[11] A. Carr,et al. Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements and Elevated Recombination at an Inducible Site-Specific Replication Fork Barrier , 2005, Cell.
[12] O. Schärer,et al. DNA Interstrand Crosslinks: Natural and Drug‐Induced DNA Adducts that Induce Unique Cellular Responses , 2005, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.
[13] T. Weinert,et al. Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast. , 2006, Genes & development.
[14] David Collingwood,et al. Genomic mapping of single-stranded DNA in hydroxyurea-challenged yeasts identifies origins of replication , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.
[15] Xiaolan Zhao,et al. Interplay between the Smc5/6 complex and the Mph1 helicase in recombinational repair , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[16] E. Gilson,et al. How telomeres are replicated , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[17] K. Kitada,et al. Mapping of early firing origins on a replication profile of budding yeast , 2002, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.
[18] A. Paek,et al. Fusion of nearby inverted repeats by a replication-based mechanism leads to formation of dicentric and acentric chromosomes that cause genome instability in budding yeast. , 2009, Genes & development.
[19] B. Gómez-González,et al. Genome instability: a mechanistic view of its causes and consequences , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[20] J. Champoux. DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. , 2001, Annual review of biochemistry.
[21] C. Lawrence,et al. The error-free component of the RAD6/RAD18 DNA damage tolerance pathway of budding yeast employs sister-strand recombination. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[22] J. Pines,et al. Stability, chromatin association and functional activity of mammalian pre‐replication complex proteins during the cell cycle , 2001, The EMBO journal.
[23] M. Lopes,et al. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. , 2006, Molecular cell.
[24] S. Mirkin,et al. Replication stalling at unstable inverted repeats: Interplay between DNA hairpins and fork stabilizing proteins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[25] K. Shirahige,et al. SCFDia2 regulates DNA replication forks during S‐phase in budding yeast , 2009, The EMBO journal.
[26] S. Mirkin,et al. DNA structures, repeat expansions and human hereditary disorders. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.
[27] L. Prakash,et al. Requirement of RAD52 Group Genes for Postreplication Repair of UV-Damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[28] Katsuhiko Shirahige,et al. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex , 2003, Nature.
[29] T. Petes,et al. Chromosomal Translocations in Yeast Induced by Low Levels of DNA Polymerase A Model for Chromosome Fragile Sites , 2005, Cell.
[30] S. Lovett,et al. DNA repeat rearrangements mediated by DnaK-dependent replication fork repair. , 2006, Molecular cell.
[31] O. Aparicio,et al. Components and Dynamics of DNA Replication Complexes in S. cerevisiae: Redistribution of MCM Proteins and Cdc45p during S Phase , 1997, Cell.
[32] Yang Shi,et al. Involvement of a chromatin remodeling complex in damage tolerance during DNA replication , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[33] Robert E. Johnson,et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD5-encoded DNA repair protein contains DNA helicase and zinc-binding sequence motifs and affects the stability of simple repetitive sequences in the genome , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.
[34] C. D. Hardy,et al. Topological challenges to DNA replication: Conformations at the fork , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[35] E. Schwob,et al. Excess MCM proteins protect human cells from replicative stress by licensing backup origins of replication , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[36] Satya Prakash,et al. Opposing Effects of Ubiquitin Conjugation and SUMO Modification of PCNA on Replicational Bypass of DNA Lesions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[37] A. D’Andrea,et al. ATR couples FANCD2 monoubiquitination to the DNA-damage response. , 2004, Genes & development.
[38] J. Diffley,et al. Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. , 2008, Genes & development.
[39] S. Kearsey,et al. Enigmatic variations: divergent modes of regulating eukaryotic DNA replication. , 2003, Molecular cell.
[40] C. Newlon,et al. DNA Replication Fork Pause Sites Dependent on Transcription , 1996, Science.
[41] R. Sinden,et al. Differential DNA secondary structure-mediated deletion mutation in the leading and lagging strands , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.
[42] P. Mieczkowski,et al. Double-strand breaks associated with repetitive DNA can reshape the genome , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[43] M. Foiani,et al. SUMOylation regulates Rad18-mediated template switch , 2008, Nature.
[44] Mihoko Kai,et al. Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis. , 2003, Genes & development.
[45] P. Giresi,et al. Highly transcribed RNA polymerase II genes are impediments to replication fork progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2009, Molecular cell.
[46] N. Cozzarelli,et al. Positive Torsional Strain Causes the Formation of a Four-way Junction at Replication Forks* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[47] Kyungjae Myung,et al. Maintenance of Genome Stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Science.
[48] Katsuhiko Shirahige,et al. Top1- and Top2-mediated topological transitions at replication forks ensure fork progression and stability and prevent DNA damage checkpoint activation. , 2007, Genes & development.
[49] J. Dalgaard,et al. A DNA replication-arrest site RTS1 regulates imprinting by determining the direction of replication at mat1 in S. pombe. , 2001, Genes & development.
[50] B. Peter,et al. The Structure of Supercoiled Intermediates in DNA Replication , 1998, Cell.
[51] E. Kipreos,et al. CUL-4 ubiquitin ligase maintains genome stability by restraining DNA-replication licensing , 2003, Nature.
[52] H. Arakawa,et al. Multiple repair pathways mediate tolerance to chemotherapeutic cross-linking agents in vertebrate cells. , 2005, Cancer research.
[53] J. D. Vos,et al. Topoisomerase I suppresses genomic instability by preventing interference between replication and transcription , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.
[54] Efterpi Papouli,et al. Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. , 2005, Molecular cell.
[55] J. Diffley,et al. Uninterrupted MCM2-7 function required for DNA replication fork progression. , 2000, Science.
[56] L. Liu,et al. Interaction between replication forks and topoisomerase I-DNA cleavable complexes: studies in a cell-free SV40 DNA replication system. , 1993, Cancer research.
[57] A. Gartner,et al. Excess Mcm2–7 license dormant origins of replication that can be used under conditions of replicative stress , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.
[58] A. Bielinsky,et al. Defects in DNA Ligase I Trigger PCNA Ubiquitination at Lysine 107 , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.
[59] C. Newlon,et al. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks , 2001, Nature.
[60] Ronald W. Davis,et al. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. , 2001, Science.
[61] P. Cook. The organization of replication and transcription. , 1999, Science.
[62] E. Schwob. Flexibility and governance in eukaryotic DNA replication. , 2004, Current opinion in microbiology.
[63] I. Hickson,et al. Esc2 and Sgs1 act in functionally distinct branches of the homologous recombination repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2009, Molecular biology of the cell.
[64] H. Piwnica-Worms,et al. DDB1 targets Chk1 to the Cul4 E3 ligase complex in normal cycling cells and in cells experiencing replication stress. , 2009, Cancer research.
[65] T. Canfield,et al. Association of fragile X syndrome with delayed replication of the FMR1 gene , 1993, Cell.
[66] A. Carr,et al. Rad3-dependent phosphorylation of the checkpoint clamp regulates repair-pathway choice , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.
[67] C. Newlon,et al. The effect on chromosome stability of deleting replication origins , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.
[68] Harry T Orr,et al. Trinucleotide repeat disorders. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.
[69] S. Elledge,et al. Identification of the FANCI Protein, a Monoubiquitinated FANCD2 Paralog Required for DNA Repair , 2007, Cell.
[70] K. Ohta,et al. Ubc9- and Mms21-Mediated Sumoylation Counteracts Recombinogenic Events at Damaged Replication Forks , 2006, Cell.
[71] D. J. Clarke,et al. DNA Topoisomerases , 2009, Methods in Molecular Biology™.
[72] S. West,et al. Identification of FAAP24, a Fanconi anemia core complex protein that interacts with FANCM. , 2007, Molecular cell.
[73] Weidong Wang,et al. Fanconi Anemia Proteins Are Required To Prevent Accumulation of Replication-Associated DNA Double-Strand Breaks , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[74] R. Heller,et al. Replication fork reactivation downstream of a blocked nascent leading strand , 2006, Nature.
[75] J. Diffley,et al. Interaction of Dbf4, the Cdc7 protein kinase regulatory subunit, with yeast replication origins in vivo. , 1994, Science.
[76] F. Fabre,et al. Alternate pathways involving Sgs1/Top3, Mus81/ Mms4, and Srs2 prevent formation of toxic recombination intermediates from single-stranded gaps created by DNA replication , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[77] S. Elledge,et al. The Fanconi Anemia Pathway Promotes Replication-Dependent DNA Interstrand Cross-Link Repair , 2009, Science.
[78] A. Constantinou,et al. Remodeling of DNA replication structures by the branch point translocase FANCM , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[79] I. Hickson,et al. Top3 processes recombination intermediates and modulates checkpoint activity after DNA damage. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.
[80] Daniel A. Koster,et al. Antitumour drugs impede DNA uncoiling by topoisomerase I , 2007, Nature.
[81] A. Sancar,et al. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. , 2004, Annual review of biochemistry.
[82] Andrzej Stasiak,et al. The Fanconi anemia protein FANCM can promote branch migration of Holliday junctions and replication forks. , 2008, Molecular cell.
[83] A. Kuzminov,et al. The Replication Intermediates in Escherichia coli Are Not the Product of DNA Processing or Uracil Excision* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[84] J. Lupski,et al. A DNA Replication Mechanism for Generating Nonrecurrent Rearrangements Associated with Genomic Disorders , 2007, Cell.
[85] Angelika Amon,et al. Closing mitosis: the functions of the Cdc14 phosphatase and its regulation. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.
[86] I. Mian,et al. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rtf2 mediates site-specific replication termination by inhibiting replication restart , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[87] Xiaolan Zhao,et al. A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[88] S. Elledge,et al. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. , 2003, Genes & development.
[89] JAMES C. Wang,et al. Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[90] R. Harland,et al. Replication origins in the eucaryotic chromosome , 1981, Cell.
[91] T. Glover,et al. Chromosome fragile sites. , 2007, Annual review of genetics.
[92] D. M. Livingston,et al. Suppression of a DNA polymerase δ mutation by the absence of the high mobility group protein Hmo1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2009, Current Genetics.
[93] L. Prakash,et al. Requirement of RAD5 and MMS2 for Postreplication Repair of UV-Damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[94] M. Lahiri,et al. Structure-Forming CAG/CTG Repeat Sequences are Sensitive to Breakage in the Absence of Mrc1 Checkpoint Function and S-Phase Checkpoint Signaling: Implications for Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion Diseases , 2004, Cell cycle.
[95] A. Constantinou,et al. FANCM regulates DNA chain elongation and is stabilized by S‐phase checkpoint signalling , 2010, The EMBO journal.
[96] M. Lopes,et al. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. , 2005, Molecular cell.
[97] M. Lopes,et al. Fork Reversal and ssDNA Accumulation at Stalled Replication Forks Owing to Checkpoint Defects , 2002, Science.
[98] D. Shore,et al. Telomere length regulation: coupling DNA end processing to feedback regulation of telomerase , 2009, The EMBO journal.
[99] M. Whitby,et al. The involvement of Srs2 in post-replication repair and homologous recombination in fission yeast. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.
[100] S. Bell. Eukaryotic replicators and associated protein complexes. , 1995, Current opinion in genetics & development.
[101] W. Xiao,et al. DNA Damage Checkpoints Are Involved in Postreplication Repair , 2006, Genetics.
[102] M. Lopes,et al. Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. , 2005, Genes & development.
[103] R. Sinden,et al. Preferential DNA secondary structure mutagenesis in the lagging strand of replication in E. coli , 1991, Nature.
[104] A. Strunnikov,et al. Essential global role of CDC14 in DNA synthesis revealed by chromosome underreplication unrecognized by checkpoints in cdc14 mutants , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[105] M. Whitby,et al. The FANCM Ortholog Fml1 Promotes Recombination at Stalled Replication Forks and Limits Crossing Over during DNA Double-Strand Break Repair , 2008, Molecular cell.
[106] A. Lehmann,et al. Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. , 2004, Molecular cell.
[107] P. Sung,et al. Mechanism of homologous recombination: mediators and helicases take on regulatory functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[108] S. Cantor,et al. BACH1 is critical for homologous recombination and appears to be the Fanconi anemia gene product FANCJ. , 2005, Cancer cell.
[109] E. Foss. Tof1p regulates DNA damage responses during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Genetics.
[110] Allen Taylor,et al. Novel control of S phase of the cell cycle by ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme H7. , 2009, Molecular biology of the cell.
[111] Ian D. Hickson,et al. The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination , 2003, Nature.
[112] J. Diffley,et al. DNA replication as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. , 2009, DNA repair.
[113] P. Plevani,et al. The 9-1-1 Checkpoint Clamp Physically Interacts with Polζ and Is Partially Required for Spontaneous Polζ-dependent Mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[114] R. Kobayashi,et al. Characterization of a High Mobility Group 1/2 Homolog in Yeast* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[115] J. Bartek,et al. DNA damage checkpoints: from initiation to recovery or adaptation. , 2007, Current opinion in cell biology.
[116] S. Jackson,et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Esc2 and Smc5-6 proteins promote sister chromatid junction-mediated intra-S repair. , 2009, Molecular biology of the cell.
[117] Matthew L. Bochman,et al. The Mcm2-7 complex has in vitro helicase activity. , 2008, Molecular cell.
[118] Weidong Wang. Emergence of a DNA-damage response network consisting of Fanconi anaemia and BRCA proteins , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[119] Shunichi Takeda,et al. Differential usage of non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination in double strand break repair. , 2006, DNA repair.
[120] R. Abraham,et al. Genotoxic stress targets human Chk1 for degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. , 2005, Molecular cell.
[121] M. DePamphilis,et al. Sequences that promote formation of catenated intertwines during termination of DNA replication. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.
[122] M. Foiani,et al. Template Switching: From Replication Fork Repair to Genome Rearrangements , 2007, Cell.
[123] K. Kurokawa,et al. Genome-Organizing Factors Top2 and Hmo1 Prevent Chromosome Fragility at Sites of S phase Transcription , 2009, Cell.
[124] K. J. Patel,et al. The Fanconi anaemia gene FANCC promotes homologous recombination and error-prone DNA repair. , 2004, Molecular cell.
[125] Weidong Wang,et al. FANCL Replaces BRCA1 as the Likely Ubiquitin Ligase Responsible for FANCD2 Monoubiquitination , 2004, Cell cycle.
[126] J. Haber,et al. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome–fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing , 2004, Oncogene.
[127] A. Stasiak,et al. Topological locking restrains replication fork reversal , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[128] S. Gasser,et al. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1 , 2003, The EMBO journal.
[129] T. Lindahl. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA , 1993, Nature.
[130] M. Foiani,et al. The checkpoint response to replication stress. , 2009, DNA repair.
[131] A. Carr,et al. Nearby inverted repeats fuse to generate acentric and dicentric palindromic chromosomes by a replication template exchange mechanism. , 2009, Genes & development.
[132] Marco Foiani,et al. Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[133] F. Prado,et al. Impairment of replication fork progression mediates RNA polII transcription‐associated recombination , 2005, The EMBO journal.
[134] S. Mirkin,et al. Replication Fork Stalling at Natural Impediments , 2007, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.
[135] M. O’Donnell,et al. The replisome uses mRNA as a primer after colliding with RNA polymerase , 2008, Nature.
[136] Jin-Qiu Zhou,et al. Saccharomyces Rrm3p, a 5' to 3' DNA helicase that promotes replication fork progression through telomeric and subtelomeric DNA. , 2002, Genes & development.
[137] A. D’Andrea,et al. S-phase-specific interaction of the Fanconi anemia protein, FANCD2, with BRCA1 and RAD51. , 2002, Blood.
[138] Jingchuan Sun,et al. Mechanism of Replication-Coupled DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair , 2008, Cell.
[139] B. Strauss,et al. A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.
[140] J. Haber,et al. Replicon Dynamics, Dormant Origin Firing, and Terminal Fork Integrity after Double-Strand Break Formation , 2009, Cell.
[141] M. Lahiri,et al. Expanded CAG repeats activate the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. , 2004, Molecular cell.
[142] C. E. Pearson,et al. Repeat instability as the basis for human diseases and as a potential target for therapy , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[143] Lara K. Goudsouzian,et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae helicase Rrm3p facilitates replication past nonhistone protein-DNA complexes. , 2003, Molecular cell.
[144] L. Hartwell,et al. RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. , 1997, Genetics.
[145] Ricky D. Edmondson,et al. GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.
[146] Hans Joenje,et al. Fanconi anemia is associated with a defect in the BRCA2 partner PALB2 , 2007, Nature Genetics.
[147] J. Schvartzman,et al. DNA knotting caused by head-on collision of transcription and replication. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[148] Jin-Qiu Zhou,et al. The Saccharomyces Pif1p DNA Helicase and the Highly Related Rrm3p Have Opposite Effects on Replication Fork Progression in Ribosomal DNA , 2000, Cell.
[149] Boris Pfander,et al. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO , 2002, Nature.
[150] L. Prakash. Characterization of postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and effects of rad6, rad18, rev3 and rad52 mutations , 2004, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.
[151] K. Labib,et al. to the Replisome Progression Complex , 2009 .
[152] John J. Wyrick,et al. Genome-Wide Distribution of ORC and MCM Proteins in S. cerevisiae: High-Resolution Mapping of Replication Origins , 2001, Science.
[153] Boris Pfander,et al. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase , 2005, Nature.
[154] S. Mirkin,et al. Large-scale expansions of Friedreich's ataxia GAA repeats in yeast. , 2009, Molecular cell.