Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork

Aberrant DNA replication is a major source of the mutations and chromosome rearrangements that are associated with pathological disorders. When replication is compromised, DNA becomes more prone to breakage. Secondary structures, highly transcribed DNA sequences and damaged DNA stall replication forks, which then require checkpoint factors and specialized enzymatic activities for their stabilization and subsequent advance. These mechanisms ensure that the local DNA damage response, which enables replication fork progression and DNA repair in S phase, is coupled with cell cycle transitions. The mechanisms that operate in eukaryotic cells to promote replication fork integrity and coordinate replication with other aspects of chromosome maintenance are becoming clear.

[1]  N. Kleckner,et al.  ATR Homolog Mec1 Promotes Fork Progression, Thus Averting Breaks in Replication Slow Zones , 2002, Science.

[2]  F. Melchior,et al.  Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[3]  S. Mirkin,et al.  Replisome stalling and stabilization at CGG repeats, which are responsible for chromosomal fragility , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[4]  G. Sutherland Fragile sites on human chromosomes: demonstration of their dependence on the type of tissue culture medium. , 1977, Science.

[5]  G. Fink,et al.  DNA rearrangements associated with a transposable element in yeast , 1980, Cell.

[6]  T. Glover,et al.  ATR Regulates Fragile Site Stability , 2002, Cell.

[7]  Philipp Stelter,et al.  Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation , 2003, Nature.

[8]  L. Johnston,et al.  Getting started: regulating the initiation of DNA replication in yeast. , 1997, Annual review of microbiology.

[9]  Junjie Chen,et al.  BRCA1 participates in DNA decatenation , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[10]  Stephen J. Elledge,et al.  Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53 , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[11]  A. Carr,et al.  Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements and Elevated Recombination at an Inducible Site-Specific Replication Fork Barrier , 2005, Cell.

[12]  O. Schärer,et al.  DNA Interstrand Crosslinks: Natural and Drug‐Induced DNA Adducts that Induce Unique Cellular Responses , 2005, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[13]  T. Weinert,et al.  Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast. , 2006, Genes & development.

[14]  David Collingwood,et al.  Genomic mapping of single-stranded DNA in hydroxyurea-challenged yeasts identifies origins of replication , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  Xiaolan Zhao,et al.  Interplay between the Smc5/6 complex and the Mph1 helicase in recombinational repair , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  E. Gilson,et al.  How telomeres are replicated , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[17]  K. Kitada,et al.  Mapping of early firing origins on a replication profile of budding yeast , 2002, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[18]  A. Paek,et al.  Fusion of nearby inverted repeats by a replication-based mechanism leads to formation of dicentric and acentric chromosomes that cause genome instability in budding yeast. , 2009, Genes & development.

[19]  B. Gómez-González,et al.  Genome instability: a mechanistic view of its causes and consequences , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  J. Champoux DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. , 2001, Annual review of biochemistry.

[21]  C. Lawrence,et al.  The error-free component of the RAD6/RAD18 DNA damage tolerance pathway of budding yeast employs sister-strand recombination. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  J. Pines,et al.  Stability, chromatin association and functional activity of mammalian pre‐replication complex proteins during the cell cycle , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[23]  M. Lopes,et al.  Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[24]  S. Mirkin,et al.  Replication stalling at unstable inverted repeats: Interplay between DNA hairpins and fork stabilizing proteins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  K. Shirahige,et al.  SCFDia2 regulates DNA replication forks during S‐phase in budding yeast , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[26]  S. Mirkin,et al.  DNA structures, repeat expansions and human hereditary disorders. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[27]  L. Prakash,et al.  Requirement of RAD52 Group Genes for Postreplication Repair of UV-Damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[28]  Katsuhiko Shirahige,et al.  S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex , 2003, Nature.

[29]  T. Petes,et al.  Chromosomal Translocations in Yeast Induced by Low Levels of DNA Polymerase A Model for Chromosome Fragile Sites , 2005, Cell.

[30]  S. Lovett,et al.  DNA repeat rearrangements mediated by DnaK-dependent replication fork repair. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[31]  O. Aparicio,et al.  Components and Dynamics of DNA Replication Complexes in S. cerevisiae: Redistribution of MCM Proteins and Cdc45p during S Phase , 1997, Cell.

[32]  Yang Shi,et al.  Involvement of a chromatin remodeling complex in damage tolerance during DNA replication , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[33]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD5-encoded DNA repair protein contains DNA helicase and zinc-binding sequence motifs and affects the stability of simple repetitive sequences in the genome , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[34]  C. D. Hardy,et al.  Topological challenges to DNA replication: Conformations at the fork , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  E. Schwob,et al.  Excess MCM proteins protect human cells from replicative stress by licensing backup origins of replication , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Satya Prakash,et al.  Opposing Effects of Ubiquitin Conjugation and SUMO Modification of PCNA on Replicational Bypass of DNA Lesions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[37]  A. D’Andrea,et al.  ATR couples FANCD2 monoubiquitination to the DNA-damage response. , 2004, Genes & development.

[38]  J. Diffley,et al.  Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. , 2008, Genes & development.

[39]  S. Kearsey,et al.  Enigmatic variations: divergent modes of regulating eukaryotic DNA replication. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[40]  C. Newlon,et al.  DNA Replication Fork Pause Sites Dependent on Transcription , 1996, Science.

[41]  R. Sinden,et al.  Differential DNA secondary structure-mediated deletion mutation in the leading and lagging strands , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[42]  P. Mieczkowski,et al.  Double-strand breaks associated with repetitive DNA can reshape the genome , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  M. Foiani,et al.  SUMOylation regulates Rad18-mediated template switch , 2008, Nature.

[44]  Mihoko Kai,et al.  Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis. , 2003, Genes & development.

[45]  P. Giresi,et al.  Highly transcribed RNA polymerase II genes are impediments to replication fork progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[46]  N. Cozzarelli,et al.  Positive Torsional Strain Causes the Formation of a Four-way Junction at Replication Forks* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  Kyungjae Myung,et al.  Maintenance of Genome Stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Science.

[48]  Katsuhiko Shirahige,et al.  Top1- and Top2-mediated topological transitions at replication forks ensure fork progression and stability and prevent DNA damage checkpoint activation. , 2007, Genes & development.

[49]  J. Dalgaard,et al.  A DNA replication-arrest site RTS1 regulates imprinting by determining the direction of replication at mat1 in S. pombe. , 2001, Genes & development.

[50]  B. Peter,et al.  The Structure of Supercoiled Intermediates in DNA Replication , 1998, Cell.

[51]  E. Kipreos,et al.  CUL-4 ubiquitin ligase maintains genome stability by restraining DNA-replication licensing , 2003, Nature.

[52]  H. Arakawa,et al.  Multiple repair pathways mediate tolerance to chemotherapeutic cross-linking agents in vertebrate cells. , 2005, Cancer research.

[53]  J. D. Vos,et al.  Topoisomerase I suppresses genomic instability by preventing interference between replication and transcription , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[54]  Efterpi Papouli,et al.  Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[55]  J. Diffley,et al.  Uninterrupted MCM2-7 function required for DNA replication fork progression. , 2000, Science.

[56]  L. Liu,et al.  Interaction between replication forks and topoisomerase I-DNA cleavable complexes: studies in a cell-free SV40 DNA replication system. , 1993, Cancer research.

[57]  A. Gartner,et al.  Excess Mcm2–7 license dormant origins of replication that can be used under conditions of replicative stress , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[58]  A. Bielinsky,et al.  Defects in DNA Ligase I Trigger PCNA Ubiquitination at Lysine 107 , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[59]  C. Newlon,et al.  The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks , 2001, Nature.

[60]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. , 2001, Science.

[61]  P. Cook The organization of replication and transcription. , 1999, Science.

[62]  E. Schwob Flexibility and governance in eukaryotic DNA replication. , 2004, Current opinion in microbiology.

[63]  I. Hickson,et al.  Esc2 and Sgs1 act in functionally distinct branches of the homologous recombination repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2009, Molecular biology of the cell.

[64]  H. Piwnica-Worms,et al.  DDB1 targets Chk1 to the Cul4 E3 ligase complex in normal cycling cells and in cells experiencing replication stress. , 2009, Cancer research.

[65]  T. Canfield,et al.  Association of fragile X syndrome with delayed replication of the FMR1 gene , 1993, Cell.

[66]  A. Carr,et al.  Rad3-dependent phosphorylation of the checkpoint clamp regulates repair-pathway choice , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[67]  C. Newlon,et al.  The effect on chromosome stability of deleting replication origins , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[68]  Harry T Orr,et al.  Trinucleotide repeat disorders. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[69]  S. Elledge,et al.  Identification of the FANCI Protein, a Monoubiquitinated FANCD2 Paralog Required for DNA Repair , 2007, Cell.

[70]  K. Ohta,et al.  Ubc9- and Mms21-Mediated Sumoylation Counteracts Recombinogenic Events at Damaged Replication Forks , 2006, Cell.

[71]  D. J. Clarke,et al.  DNA Topoisomerases , 2009, Methods in Molecular Biology™.

[72]  S. West,et al.  Identification of FAAP24, a Fanconi anemia core complex protein that interacts with FANCM. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[73]  Weidong Wang,et al.  Fanconi Anemia Proteins Are Required To Prevent Accumulation of Replication-Associated DNA Double-Strand Breaks , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[74]  R. Heller,et al.  Replication fork reactivation downstream of a blocked nascent leading strand , 2006, Nature.

[75]  J. Diffley,et al.  Interaction of Dbf4, the Cdc7 protein kinase regulatory subunit, with yeast replication origins in vivo. , 1994, Science.

[76]  F. Fabre,et al.  Alternate pathways involving Sgs1/Top3, Mus81/ Mms4, and Srs2 prevent formation of toxic recombination intermediates from single-stranded gaps created by DNA replication , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[77]  S. Elledge,et al.  The Fanconi Anemia Pathway Promotes Replication-Dependent DNA Interstrand Cross-Link Repair , 2009, Science.

[78]  A. Constantinou,et al.  Remodeling of DNA replication structures by the branch point translocase FANCM , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  I. Hickson,et al.  Top3 processes recombination intermediates and modulates checkpoint activity after DNA damage. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[80]  Daniel A. Koster,et al.  Antitumour drugs impede DNA uncoiling by topoisomerase I , 2007, Nature.

[81]  A. Sancar,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. , 2004, Annual review of biochemistry.

[82]  Andrzej Stasiak,et al.  The Fanconi anemia protein FANCM can promote branch migration of Holliday junctions and replication forks. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[83]  A. Kuzminov,et al.  The Replication Intermediates in Escherichia coli Are Not the Product of DNA Processing or Uracil Excision* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[84]  J. Lupski,et al.  A DNA Replication Mechanism for Generating Nonrecurrent Rearrangements Associated with Genomic Disorders , 2007, Cell.

[85]  Angelika Amon,et al.  Closing mitosis: the functions of the Cdc14 phosphatase and its regulation. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[86]  I. Mian,et al.  Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rtf2 mediates site-specific replication termination by inhibiting replication restart , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[87]  Xiaolan Zhao,et al.  A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[88]  S. Elledge,et al.  Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. , 2003, Genes & development.

[89]  JAMES C. Wang,et al.  Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[90]  R. Harland,et al.  Replication origins in the eucaryotic chromosome , 1981, Cell.

[91]  T. Glover,et al.  Chromosome fragile sites. , 2007, Annual review of genetics.

[92]  D. M. Livingston,et al.  Suppression of a DNA polymerase δ mutation by the absence of the high mobility group protein Hmo1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2009, Current Genetics.

[93]  L. Prakash,et al.  Requirement of RAD5 and MMS2 for Postreplication Repair of UV-Damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[94]  M. Lahiri,et al.  Structure-Forming CAG/CTG Repeat Sequences are Sensitive to Breakage in the Absence of Mrc1 Checkpoint Function and S-Phase Checkpoint Signaling: Implications for Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion Diseases , 2004, Cell cycle.

[95]  A. Constantinou,et al.  FANCM regulates DNA chain elongation and is stabilized by S‐phase checkpoint signalling , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[96]  M. Lopes,et al.  Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[97]  M. Lopes,et al.  Fork Reversal and ssDNA Accumulation at Stalled Replication Forks Owing to Checkpoint Defects , 2002, Science.

[98]  D. Shore,et al.  Telomere length regulation: coupling DNA end processing to feedback regulation of telomerase , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[99]  M. Whitby,et al.  The involvement of Srs2 in post-replication repair and homologous recombination in fission yeast. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[100]  S. Bell Eukaryotic replicators and associated protein complexes. , 1995, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[101]  W. Xiao,et al.  DNA Damage Checkpoints Are Involved in Postreplication Repair , 2006, Genetics.

[102]  M. Lopes,et al.  Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. , 2005, Genes & development.

[103]  R. Sinden,et al.  Preferential DNA secondary structure mutagenesis in the lagging strand of replication in E. coli , 1991, Nature.

[104]  A. Strunnikov,et al.  Essential global role of CDC14 in DNA synthesis revealed by chromosome underreplication unrecognized by checkpoints in cdc14 mutants , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[105]  M. Whitby,et al.  The FANCM Ortholog Fml1 Promotes Recombination at Stalled Replication Forks and Limits Crossing Over during DNA Double-Strand Break Repair , 2008, Molecular cell.

[106]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[107]  P. Sung,et al.  Mechanism of homologous recombination: mediators and helicases take on regulatory functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[108]  S. Cantor,et al.  BACH1 is critical for homologous recombination and appears to be the Fanconi anemia gene product FANCJ. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[109]  E. Foss Tof1p regulates DNA damage responses during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Genetics.

[110]  Allen Taylor,et al.  Novel control of S phase of the cell cycle by ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme H7. , 2009, Molecular biology of the cell.

[111]  Ian D. Hickson,et al.  The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination , 2003, Nature.

[112]  J. Diffley,et al.  DNA replication as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. , 2009, DNA repair.

[113]  P. Plevani,et al.  The 9-1-1 Checkpoint Clamp Physically Interacts with Polζ and Is Partially Required for Spontaneous Polζ-dependent Mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[114]  R. Kobayashi,et al.  Characterization of a High Mobility Group 1/2 Homolog in Yeast* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[115]  J. Bartek,et al.  DNA damage checkpoints: from initiation to recovery or adaptation. , 2007, Current opinion in cell biology.

[116]  S. Jackson,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Esc2 and Smc5-6 proteins promote sister chromatid junction-mediated intra-S repair. , 2009, Molecular biology of the cell.

[117]  Matthew L. Bochman,et al.  The Mcm2-7 complex has in vitro helicase activity. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[118]  Weidong Wang Emergence of a DNA-damage response network consisting of Fanconi anaemia and BRCA proteins , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[119]  Shunichi Takeda,et al.  Differential usage of non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination in double strand break repair. , 2006, DNA repair.

[120]  R. Abraham,et al.  Genotoxic stress targets human Chk1 for degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[121]  M. DePamphilis,et al.  Sequences that promote formation of catenated intertwines during termination of DNA replication. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.

[122]  M. Foiani,et al.  Template Switching: From Replication Fork Repair to Genome Rearrangements , 2007, Cell.

[123]  K. Kurokawa,et al.  Genome-Organizing Factors Top2 and Hmo1 Prevent Chromosome Fragility at Sites of S phase Transcription , 2009, Cell.

[124]  K. J. Patel,et al.  The Fanconi anaemia gene FANCC promotes homologous recombination and error-prone DNA repair. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[125]  Weidong Wang,et al.  FANCL Replaces BRCA1 as the Likely Ubiquitin Ligase Responsible for FANCD2 Monoubiquitination , 2004, Cell cycle.

[126]  J. Haber,et al.  Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome–fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing , 2004, Oncogene.

[127]  A. Stasiak,et al.  Topological locking restrains replication fork reversal , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[128]  S. Gasser,et al.  DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1 , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[129]  T. Lindahl Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA , 1993, Nature.

[130]  M. Foiani,et al.  The checkpoint response to replication stress. , 2009, DNA repair.

[131]  A. Carr,et al.  Nearby inverted repeats fuse to generate acentric and dicentric palindromic chromosomes by a replication template exchange mechanism. , 2009, Genes & development.

[132]  Marco Foiani,et al.  Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[133]  F. Prado,et al.  Impairment of replication fork progression mediates RNA polII transcription‐associated recombination , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[134]  S. Mirkin,et al.  Replication Fork Stalling at Natural Impediments , 2007, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[135]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  The replisome uses mRNA as a primer after colliding with RNA polymerase , 2008, Nature.

[136]  Jin-Qiu Zhou,et al.  Saccharomyces Rrm3p, a 5' to 3' DNA helicase that promotes replication fork progression through telomeric and subtelomeric DNA. , 2002, Genes & development.

[137]  A. D’Andrea,et al.  S-phase-specific interaction of the Fanconi anemia protein, FANCD2, with BRCA1 and RAD51. , 2002, Blood.

[138]  Jingchuan Sun,et al.  Mechanism of Replication-Coupled DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair , 2008, Cell.

[139]  B. Strauss,et al.  A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[140]  J. Haber,et al.  Replicon Dynamics, Dormant Origin Firing, and Terminal Fork Integrity after Double-Strand Break Formation , 2009, Cell.

[141]  M. Lahiri,et al.  Expanded CAG repeats activate the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[142]  C. E. Pearson,et al.  Repeat instability as the basis for human diseases and as a potential target for therapy , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[143]  Lara K. Goudsouzian,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae helicase Rrm3p facilitates replication past nonhistone protein-DNA complexes. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[144]  L. Hartwell,et al.  RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. , 1997, Genetics.

[145]  Ricky D. Edmondson,et al.  GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[146]  Hans Joenje,et al.  Fanconi anemia is associated with a defect in the BRCA2 partner PALB2 , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[147]  J. Schvartzman,et al.  DNA knotting caused by head-on collision of transcription and replication. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[148]  Jin-Qiu Zhou,et al.  The Saccharomyces Pif1p DNA Helicase and the Highly Related Rrm3p Have Opposite Effects on Replication Fork Progression in Ribosomal DNA , 2000, Cell.

[149]  Boris Pfander,et al.  RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO , 2002, Nature.

[150]  L. Prakash Characterization of postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and effects of rad6, rad18, rev3 and rad52 mutations , 2004, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[151]  K. Labib,et al.  to the Replisome Progression Complex , 2009 .

[152]  John J. Wyrick,et al.  Genome-Wide Distribution of ORC and MCM Proteins in S. cerevisiae: High-Resolution Mapping of Replication Origins , 2001, Science.

[153]  Boris Pfander,et al.  SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase , 2005, Nature.

[154]  S. Mirkin,et al.  Large-scale expansions of Friedreich's ataxia GAA repeats in yeast. , 2009, Molecular cell.