Agent Mertacor: A robust design for dealing with uncertainty and variation in SCM environments

Supply Chain Management (SCM) has recently entered a new era, where the old-fashioned static, long-term relationships between involved actors are being replaced by new, dynamic negotiating schemas, established over virtual organizations and trading marketplaces. SCM environments now operate under strict policies that all interested parties (suppliers, manufacturers, customers) have to abide by, in order to participate. And, though such dynamic markets provide greater profit potential, they also conceal greater risks, since competition is tougher and request and demand may vary significantly in the quest for maximum benefit. The need for efficient SCM actors is thus implied, actors that may handle the deluge of (either complete or incomplete) information generated, perceive variations and exploit the full potential of the environments they inhabit. In this context, we introduce Mertacor, an agent that employs robust mechanisms for dealing with all SCM facets and for trading within dynamic and competitive SCM environments. Its efficiency has been extensively tested in one of the most challenging SCM environments, the Trading Agent Competition (TAC) SCM game. This paper provides an extensive analysis of Mertacor and its main architectural primitives, provides an overview of the TAC SCM environment, and thoroughly discusses Mertacor's performance.

[1]  J. R. Quinlan Learning With Continuous Classes , 1992 .

[2]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[3]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[4]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  A negotiation-based Multi-agent System for Supply Chain Management , 1999 .

[5]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence , 1999 .

[6]  Jason Miller,et al.  Market Efficiency, Sales Competition, and the Bullwhip Effect in the TAC SCM Tournaments , 2006, TADA/AMEC.

[7]  David W. Hildum,et al.  MASCOT: An Agent-based Architecture for Coordinated Mixed-Initiative Supply Chain Planning and Scheduling , 1999 .

[8]  Peter Stone,et al.  TacTex-03: a supply chain management agent , 2004, SECO.

[9]  Tim Finin,et al.  Negotiating agents for supply chain management , 1999, AAAI 1999.

[10]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  On Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[11]  D. Simchi-Levi Designing And Managing The Supply Chain , 2007 .

[12]  Pericles A. Mitkas,et al.  Exploiting Data Mining Techniques for Improving the Efficiency of a Supply Chain Management Agent , 2006, 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology Workshops.

[13]  Norman M. Sadeh,et al.  The supply chain trading agent competition , 2005, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[14]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Designing and Evaluating an Adaptive Trading Agent for Supply Chain Management Applications , 2005 .

[15]  Feng Cheng,et al.  Inventory-Service Optimization in Configure-to-Order Systems , 2002, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[16]  John Collins,et al.  The Supply Chain Management Game for the 2007 Trading Agent Competition , 2004 .

[17]  Maria L. Gini,et al.  A Market-Pressure-Based Performance Evaluator for TAC-SCM , 2006, TADA/AMEC.

[18]  Peter Stone,et al.  Bidding for customer orders in TAC SCM , 2004, AAMAS'04.

[19]  Peter R. Wurman,et al.  PackaTAC: a conservative trading agent , 2004, SECO.