Conversations with AutoTutor Help Students Learn

AutoTutor helps students learn by holding a conversation in natural language. AutoTutor is adaptive to the learners’ actions, verbal contributions, and in some systems their emotions. Many of AutoTutor’s conversation patterns simulate human tutoring, but other patterns implement ideal pedagogies that open the door to computer tutors eclipsing human tutors in learning gains. Indeed, current versions of AutoTutor yield learning gains on par with novice and expert human tutors. This article selectively highlights the status of AutoTutor’s dialogue moves, learning gains, implementation challenges, differences between human and ideal tutors, and some of the systems that evolved from AutoTutor. Current and future AutoTutor projects are investigating three-party conversations, called trialogues, where two agents (such as a tutor and student) interact with the human learner.

[1]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  AutoTutor and affective autotutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back , 2012, TIIS.

[2]  A. Graesser,et al.  Confusion can be beneficial for learning. , 2014 .

[3]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Guru: A Computer Tutor That Models Expert Human Tutors , 2012, ITS.

[4]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Learning by Communicating in Natural Language With Conversational Agents , 2014 .

[5]  Jonathan P. Rowe,et al.  Integrating Learning, Problem Solving, and Engagement in Narrative-Centered Learning Environments , 2011, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[6]  Sidney K. D'Mello,et al.  Dialogue Modes in Expert Tutoring , 2008, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[7]  Wayne H. Ward,et al.  My Science Tutor: A Conversational Multimedia Virtual Tutor. , 2013 .

[8]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Handbook of latent semantic analysis , 2007 .

[9]  Heather H. Mitchell,et al.  AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[10]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Recent Advances in Conversational Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2013, AI Mag..

[11]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Agent Technologies Designed to Facilitate Interactive Knowledge Construction , 2008 .

[12]  K. VanLehn The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems , 2011 .

[13]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  When Are Tutorial Dialogues More Effective Than Reading? , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Pragmatics and Pedagogy: Conversational Rules and Politeness Strategies May Inhibit Effective Tutoring , 1995 .

[15]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[16]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  AutoTutor and Family: A Review of 17 Years of Natural Language Tutoring , 2014, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[17]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Inducing and Tracking Confusion with Contradictions during Complex Learning , 2013, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[18]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Aplicaciones del diálogo humano de tutoría al autotutor: un sistema inteligente de tutoría , 2006 .

[19]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Improving Adolescent Students' Reading Comprehension with Istart , 2006 .

[20]  A. Graesser,et al.  Question Asking During Tutoring , 1994 .

[21]  Nia Dowell,et al.  Does it really matter whether students' contributions are spoken versus typed in an intelligent tutoring system with natural language? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[22]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. , 1997 .

[23]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Improving the Efficiency of Dialogue in Tutoring. , 2012 .

[24]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Inferring what the student knows in one-to-one tutoring: The role of student questions and answers , 1994 .

[25]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Teaching Tactics and Dialog in AutoTutor , 2001 .

[26]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The Effects of a Traditional and Technology-based After-school Setting on 6th Grade Student’s Mathematics Skills , 2012 .

[27]  Brent Morgan,et al.  Exploring the deep-level reasoning questions effect during vicarious learning among eighth to eleventh graders in the domains of computer literacy and Newtonian physics , 2009 .

[28]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  BEETLE II: Deep Natural Language Understanding and Automatic Feedback Generation for Intelligent Tutoring in Basic Electricity and Electronics , 2014, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[29]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning in Learning Environments With Pedagogical Agents That Interact in Natural Language , 2010 .

[30]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. , 2002 .

[31]  Keith K. Millis,et al.  Operation ARA: A computerized learning game that teaches critical thinking and scientific reasoning , 2012 .

[32]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Instruction Based on Tutoring , 2010 .

[33]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Measuring Self-Regulated Learning Skills through Social Interactions in a teachable Agent Environment , 2010, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[34]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. , 1999 .

[35]  Candice Burkett,et al.  Trialog in ARIES : User Input Assessment in an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2011 .

[36]  Valerie F. Reyna,et al.  Efficacy of a Web-Based Intelligent Tutoring System for Communicating Genetic Risk of Breast Cancer , 2015, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[37]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Two Heads May Be Better than One: Learning from Computer Agents in Conversational Trialogues. , 2017 .

[38]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring , 1995 .

[39]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Operation ARIES!: A Serious Game for Teaching Scientific Inquiry , 2011, Serious Games and Edutainment Applications.

[40]  Stephen M. Fiore,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Macrocognition in Teams: Predicting Processes in Complex Collaborative Contexts , 2010, Hum. Factors.