Systematic assessment of terrestrial biogeochemistry in coupled climate–carbon models

With representation of the global carbon cycle becoming increasingly complex in climate models, it is important to develop ways to quantitatively evaluate model performance against in situ and remote sensing observations. Here we present a systematic framework, the Carbon-LAnd Model Intercomparison Project (C-LAMP), for assessing terrestrial biogeochemistry models coupled to climate models using observations that span a wide range of temporal and spatial scales. As an example of the value of such comparisons, we used this framework to evaluate two biogeochemistry models that are integrated within the Community Climate System Model (CCSM) -Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach′ (CASA′) and carbon-nitrogen (CN). Both models underestimated the magnitude of net carbon uptake during the growing season in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems, based on comparison with atmospheric CO 2 measurements and eddy covariance measurements of net ecosystem exchange. Comparison with MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) measurements show that this low bias in model fluxes was caused, at least in part, by 1-3 month delays in the timing of maximum leaf area. In the tropics, the models overestimated carbon storage in woody biomass based on comparison with datasets from the Amazon. Reducing this model bias will probably weaken the sensitivity of terrestrial carbon fluxes to both atmospheric CO2 and climate. Global carbon sinks during the 1990s differed by a factor of two (2.4PgCyr-1 for CASA′ vs. 1.2PgCyr-1 for CN), with fluxes from both models compatible with the atmospheric budget given uncertainties in other terms. The models captured some of the timing of interannual global terrestrial carbon exchange during 1988-2004 based on comparison with atmospheric inversion results from TRANSCOM (r =0.66 for CASA′ and r =0.73 for CN). Adding (CASA′) or improving (CN) the representation of deforestation fires may further increase agreement with the atmospheric record. Information from C-LAMP has enhanced model performance within CCSM and serves as a benchmark for future development. We propose that an open source, community-wide platform for model-data intercomparison is needed to speed model development and to strengthen ties between modeling and measurement communities. Important next steps include the design and analysis of land use change simulations (in both uncoupled and coupled modes), and the entrainment of additional ecological and earth system observations. Model results from C-LAMP are publicly available on the Earth System Grid. © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

[1]  H. Matthews Implications of CO2 fertilization for future climate change in a coupled climate–carbon model , 2007 .

[2]  S. Running,et al.  Regional evaporation estimates from flux tower and MODIS satellite data , 2007 .

[3]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models through simulations of the seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO2: First results of a model intercomparison study , 1998 .

[4]  Scott C. Doney,et al.  Contribution of ocean, fossil fuel, land biosphere, and biomass burning carbon fluxes to seasonal and interannual variability in atmospheric CO2 , 2008 .

[5]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Community Land Model and Its Climate Statistics as a Component of the Community Climate System Model , 2006 .

[6]  R. Betts,et al.  The role of ecosystem-atmosphere interactions in simulated Amazonian precipitation decrease and forest dieback under global climate warming , 2004 .

[7]  F. Woodward,et al.  Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models , 2001 .

[8]  J. Randerson,et al.  Climate regulation of fire emissions and deforestation in equatorial Asia , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Zhao-Liang Li,et al.  Validation of the land-surface temperature products retrieved from Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer data , 2002 .

[10]  Scott C. Doney,et al.  Natural Variability in a Stable, 1000-Yr Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Cycle Simulation , 2006 .

[11]  K. Wilson,et al.  Comparing independent estimates of carbon dioxide exchange over 5 years at a deciduous forest in the southeastern , 2001 .

[12]  S. Sitch,et al.  The role of fire disturbance for global vegetation dynamics: coupling fire into a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2008 .

[13]  J. Randerson,et al.  Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data , 1993 .

[14]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems , 2007 .

[15]  Kevin R. Gurney,et al.  TransCom 3 inversion intercomparison: Impact of transport model errors on the interannual variability of regional CO2 fluxes, 1988–2003 , 2006 .

[16]  J. Randerson,et al.  The Carbon-Land Model Intercomparison Project (C-LAMP): A Protocol and Evaluation Metrics for Global Terrestrial Biogeochemistry Models , 2008 .

[17]  M. D. Nelson,et al.  Mapping U.S. forest biomass using nationwide forest inventory data and moderate resolution information , 2008 .

[18]  Pieter P. Tans,et al.  Evidence for interannual variability of the carbon cycle from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory Global Air Sampling Network , 1994 .

[19]  P. J. Edwards,et al.  World Forest Biomass and Primary Production Data. , 1983 .

[20]  J. Randerson,et al.  New constraints on Northern Hemisphere growing season net flux , 2007 .

[21]  P. Friedlingstein,et al.  Toward an allocation scheme for global terrestrial carbon models , 1999 .

[22]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research , 2007 .

[23]  Pieter P. Tans,et al.  Extension and integration of atmospheric carbon dioxide data into a globally consistent measurement record , 1995 .

[24]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  The contribution of terrestrial sources and sinks to trends in the seasonal cycle of atmospheric carbon dioxide , 1997 .

[25]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Improvements to the Community Land Model and their impact on the hydrological cycle , 2008 .

[26]  R. Betts,et al.  Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model , 2000, Nature.

[27]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Factors Controlling Long- and Short-Term Sequestration of Atmospheric CO2 in a Mid-latitude Forest , 2001, Science.

[28]  Arie Shoshani,et al.  The Earth System Grid: Supporting the Next Generation of Climate Modeling Research , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[29]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Future Expansion Of Agriculture and Pasture Acts to Amplify Atmospheric CO2 Levels in Response to Fossil-Fuel and Land-Use Change Emissions , 2004 .

[30]  K. Oleson,et al.  Use of FLUXNET in the Community Land Model development , 2008 .

[31]  K. Davis,et al.  Comparing net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide between an old-growth and mature forest in the upper Midwest, USA , 2005 .

[32]  K. Treseder,et al.  Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. , 2008, Ecology.

[33]  Douglas W. Nychka,et al.  A comparison of a GCM response to historical anthropogenic land cover change and model sensitivity to uncertainty in present-day land cover representations , 2005 .

[34]  R. Betts,et al.  Amazonian forest dieback under climate-carbon cycle projections for the 21st century , 2004 .

[35]  S. Running,et al.  Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data , 2002 .

[36]  Steven W. Running,et al.  Ecosystem Disturbance, Carbon, and Climate , 2008, Science.

[37]  The spatial distribution of forest biomass in the Brazilian Amazon: a comparison of estimates , 2001 .

[38]  R. Dickinson,et al.  Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry , 2007 .

[39]  J. Randerson,et al.  Carbon isotope discrimination of arctic and boreal biomes inferred from remote atmospheric measurements and a biosphere‐atmosphere model , 2002 .

[40]  J. Chambers,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of carbon productivity, allocation and storage in three Amazonian forests , 2009 .

[41]  P. Thornton,et al.  Ecosystem model spin-up: Estimating steady state conditions in a coupled terrestrial carbon and nitrogen cycle model , 2005 .

[42]  J. V. Soares,et al.  Distribution of aboveground live biomass in the Amazon basin , 2007 .

[43]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Transcom 3 inversion intercomparison: Model mean results for the estimation of seasonal carbon sources and sinks , 2004, Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

[44]  David Crisp,et al.  The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) mission , 2004 .

[45]  Luiz Antonio Martinelli,et al.  Forest structure and carbon dynamics in Amazonian tropical rain forests , 2004, Oecologia.

[46]  Lisa J. Graumlich,et al.  Interactive Canopies for a Climate Model , 1998 .

[47]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Influence of carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability , 2007 .

[48]  N. C. Strugnell,et al.  First operational BRDF, albedo nadir reflectance products from MODIS , 2002 .

[49]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors , 2008 .

[50]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Comparing and evaluating process‐based ecosystem model predictions of carbon and water fluxes in major European forest biomes , 2005, Global change biology.

[52]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models with atmospheric CO2 measurements: Results from transient simulations considering increasing CO2, climate, and land‐use effects , 2002 .

[53]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  An Improved Canopy Integration Scheme for a Land Surface Model with Prognostic Canopy Structure , 2007 .

[54]  Robert E. Schuler,et al.  Building a Global Federation System for Climate Change Research: The Earth System Grid Center for Enabling Technologies (ESG-CET) , 2007 .

[55]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Sensitivity of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) terrestrial primary production to the accuracy of meteorological reanalyses , 2006 .

[56]  Scott D. Miller,et al.  Effects of selective logging on tropical forest tree growth , 2008 .

[57]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Assessing future nitrogen deposition and carbon cycle feedback using a multimodel approach: Analysis of nitrogen deposition , 2005 .

[58]  Michael J. Rogers,et al.  Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming , 2005, Nature.

[59]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Hurricane Katrina's Carbon Footprint on U.S. Gulf Coast Forests , 2007, Science.

[60]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  The Partitioning of Evapotranspiration into Transpiration, Soil Evaporation, and Canopy Evaporation in a GCM: Impacts on Land–Atmosphere Interaction , 2007 .

[61]  J. Dufresne,et al.  Positive feedback between future climate change and the carbon cycle , 2001 .

[62]  W. Cohen,et al.  North American forest disturbance mapped from a decadal Landsat record , 2008 .

[63]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Modeling and measuring the effects of disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen needleleaf forests , 2002 .

[64]  Cristina Milesi,et al.  User's Guide GPP and NPP (MOD17A2/A3) Products NASA MODIS Land Algorithm , 2003 .

[65]  Mark E. Harmon,et al.  Global-Scale Similarities in Nitrogen Release Patterns During Long-Term Decomposition , 2007, Science.

[66]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Weak Northern and Strong Tropical Land Carbon Uptake from Vertical Profiles of Atmospheric CO2 , 2007, Science.

[67]  G. Bonan Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[68]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Evaluation of remote sensing based terrestrial productivity from MODIS using regional tower eddy flux network observations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[69]  S. Page,et al.  The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997 , 2002, Nature.

[70]  S. Malyshev,et al.  The underpinnings of land‐use history: three centuries of global gridded land‐use transitions, wood‐harvest activity, and resulting secondary lands , 2006 .

[71]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set , 2005 .

[72]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere in the Twentieth Century: Analyses of CO2, climate and land use effects with four process‐based ecosystem models , 2001 .

[73]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data , 2007 .

[74]  J. Randerson,et al.  Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004 , 2006 .

[75]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  CO2 fertilization in temperate FACE experiments not representative of boreal and tropical forests , 2008 .

[76]  P. Cox,et al.  How positive is the feedback between climate change and the carbon cycle? , 2003 .

[77]  K. Lindsay,et al.  Evolution of carbon sinks in a changing climate. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[78]  P. Friedlingstein,et al.  What determines the magnitude of carbon cycle‐climate feedbacks? , 2007 .

[79]  Christopher Uhl,et al.  Leaf demography and phenology in Amazonian rain forest : a census of 40,000 leaves of 23 tree species , 2004 .

[80]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[81]  Scott D. Miller,et al.  BIOMETRIC AND MICROMETEOROLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS OF TROPICAL FOREST CARBON BALANCE , 2004 .

[82]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Feedbacks of Terrestrial Ecosystems to Climate Change , 2007 .

[83]  K. Caldeira,et al.  Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[84]  Keith W. Oleson,et al.  Simulation of Global Land Surface Conditions from 1948 to 2004. Part I: Forcing Data and Evaluations , 2006 .

[85]  W. Oechel,et al.  Seasonality of ecosystem respiration and gross primary production as derived from FLUXNET measurements , 2001 .

[86]  J. Dufresne,et al.  Global response of the terrestrial biosphere to CO2 and climate change using a coupled climate‐carbon cycle model , 2002 .

[87]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[88]  D. Schimel,et al.  CONTINENTAL SCALE VARIABILITY IN ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES: MODELS, DATA, AND THE ROLE OF DISTURBANCE , 1997 .

[89]  E. Davidson,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change , 2006, Nature.

[90]  Julie D. Jastrow,et al.  Impacts of Fine Root Turnover on Forest NPP and Soil C Sequestration Potential , 2003, Science.

[91]  Thomas Kaminski,et al.  Assimilating atmospheric data into a terrestrial biosphere model: A case study of the seasonal cycle , 2002 .