Experimental analysis of behavior and tobacco regulatory research on nicotine reduction.

With the signing of H.R. 1256, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gained regulatory authority over the tobacco industry. A notable clause in this Act permits the FDA to regulate nicotine yields. However, they cannot completely remove this addictive constituent from tobacco products. This restriction has prompted the FDA to seek research on the threshold dose of nicotine that does not support dependence. This idea of threshold dose has led to an interesting reframing of scientific questions. For example, some researchers studying nicotine from this regulatory perspective translated the notion of an addiction threshold to a construct thought to play a role in addiction but which can be more readily operationalized. Examples include reinforcement threshold, discrimination threshold, and reinforcer-enhancement threshold. In this Perspective Paper, we highlight the importance of behavioral pharmacology and, specifically, the experimental analysis of behavior to help establish a scientific basis for policy decisions regarding nicotine yields. Recent research, including exemplars provided herein, note vast individual differences in the effects of nicotine at a known dose. Unfortunately, the behavioral and biological factors that contribute to such individual variations remain to be understood. We believe that behavior analysts are uniquely well-positioned to contribute to this understanding.

[1]  K. Perkins,et al.  Sex Differences in Subjective Responses To Moderate Versus Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes , 2018, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[2]  Sarah M. Hartz,et al.  Genetic correlation between smoking behaviors and schizophrenia , 2017, Schizophrenia Research.

[3]  Derek D. Reed,et al.  Addiction Potential of Cigarettes With Reduced Nicotine Content in Populations With Psychiatric Disorders and Other Vulnerabilities to Tobacco Addiction , 2017, JAMA psychiatry.

[4]  E. Donny,et al.  Animal Research on Nicotine Reduction: Current Evidence and Research Gaps , 2017, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[5]  K. Perkins,et al.  Preliminary test of cigarette nicotine discrimination threshold in non-dependent versus dependent smokers. , 2017, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[6]  J. Henningfield,et al.  Behavioral pharmacology contributions to regulation of drug and tobacco products by the Food and Drug Administration. , 2016 .

[7]  R. Bevins,et al.  Laboratory Notes From Behavioral Pharmacologists and Trainees: Considerations for the Discipline. , 2016, Behavior analysis.

[8]  K. Perkins,et al.  Threshold dose for discrimination of nicotine via cigarette smoking , 2016, Psychopharmacology.

[9]  R. Bevins,et al.  Sex differences and the role of dopamine receptors in the reward-enhancing effects of nicotine and bupropion , 2016, Psychopharmacology.

[10]  R. Bevins,et al.  Individual differences in the behavioral effects of nicotine: A review of the preclinical animal literature , 2015, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[11]  M. Lesage,et al.  Predictors of the nicotine reinforcement threshold, compensation, and elasticity of demand in a rodent model of nicotine reduction policy. , 2015, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[12]  R. Bevins,et al.  We know very little about the subjective effects of drugs in females. , 2015, ACS chemical neuroscience.

[13]  D. Hatsukami,et al.  Nicotine reduction as an increase in the unit price of cigarettes: a behavioral economics approach. , 2014, Preventive medicine.

[14]  R. Bevins,et al.  Interoception and learning: import to understanding and treating diseases and psychopathologies. , 2014, ACS chemical neuroscience.

[15]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Sex differences in nicotine self-administration in rats during progressive unit dose reduction: Implications for nicotine regulation policy , 2013, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[16]  R. Bevins,et al.  Nicotine enhances operant responding for qualitatively distinct reinforcers under maintenance and extinction conditions , 2013, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[17]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Reducing the nicotine content to make cigarettes less addictive , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[18]  M. Sofuoglu,et al.  The reinforcement threshold for nicotine as a target for tobacco control. , 2012, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[19]  Douglas A Luke,et al.  Family Smoking Prevention And Tobacco Control Act: banning outdoor tobacco advertising near schools and playgrounds. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  R. Bevins,et al.  Acquired appetitive responding to intravenous nicotine reflects a Pavlovian conditioned association. , 2009, Behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  R. Bevins,et al.  The motivational impact of nicotine and its role in tobacco use. Proceedings of the 55th Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, Nebraska, USA. , 2009, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[22]  Steven R Hursh,et al.  Economic demand and essential value. , 2008, Psychological review.

[23]  R. Bevins,et al.  Extending the role of associative learning processes in nicotine addiction. , 2004, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[24]  R. Hurt,et al.  Prying open the door to the tobacco industry's secrets about nicotine: the Minnesota Tobacco Trial. , 1998, JAMA.

[25]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. The implications for tobacco regulation. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.