Recognition of taboo words as a function of a priori probability.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Detection of a visual signal with low background noise: an experimental comparison of two theories. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.
[2] R H Price,et al. Signal-detection methods in personality and perception. , 1966, Psychological bulletin.
[3] L. Postman,et al. Is there a mechanism of perceptual defense? , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[4] R. Zajonc,et al. PERCEPTION, DRIVE, AND BEHAVIOR THEORY. , 1964, Psychological review.
[5] W. F. Hawkins,et al. Vexierversuch: the log relationship between word-frequency and recognition obtained in the absence of stimulus words. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.
[6] D. Dorfman,et al. Recognition of taboo stimuli as a function of exposure time. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[7] J SWETS,et al. Decision processes in perception. , 1961, Psychological review.
[8] D. M. Green,et al. Psychoacoustics and Detection Theory , 1960 .
[9] E. McGinnies. Emotionality and perceptual defense. , 1949, Psychological review.
[10] D. M. Green,et al. Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .
[11] R. Zajonc,et al. Relationship between word frequency and recognition: Perceptual process or response bias? , 1964 .