Using Landmark Detection to measure effective Clear Speech

While the relationship of clear speaking style to intelligibility under challenging conditions has been established, it is a common observation that some speakers seem to be more intelligible than others for most listeners. In previous work, we have reported that automatic measures based on the technique of Landmark Detection appear to track differences between Clear and Conversational speaking style. One question that remains is whether Landmark measures can be used to predict which speakers are most likely to produce highly intelligible speech. In this study, we took advantage of a set of previously acquired databases to examine correlations between our Landmark-based measures and the Clear Speech productions of highly intelligible speech. Across these databases, we had data on intelligibility for a range of speakers. Results showed that speakers with high overall intelligibility in Clear Speech showed significantly different patterns on Landmark-based automatic measures, compared to speakers with more moderate performance on intelligibility measures. Applications of these results to problems in speech technology, linguistic education and clinical practice will be discussed.

[1]  Sharlene A. Liu,et al.  Landmark detection for distinctive feature-based speech recognition , 1996 .

[2]  Ann R Bradlow,et al.  Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Ann R Bradlow,et al.  Temporal organization of English clear and conversational speech. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  S. H. Ferguson,et al.  Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Implementation of a model for lexical access based on features , 1992, ICSLP.

[6]  J. C. Krause,et al.  Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Tessa Bent,et al.  The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Harriet J. Fell,et al.  SpeechMark: Landmark Detection Tool for Speech Analysis , 2012, INTERSPEECH.

[9]  Linda J. Ferrier,et al.  Vocalization age as a clinical tool , 2002, INTERSPEECH.

[10]  J. Jerger Clear speech. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[11]  Jean C. Krause,et al.  Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: the effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.