Effects of operating conditions and membrane structures on the performance of hollow fiber forward osmosis membranes in pressure assisted osmosis

Abstract Recently, forward osmosis (FO) has received much attention as an advanced water treatment technology. Although the FO process has begun to spread widely worldwide, it still has some problems – such as the low water permeation rate compared with those required for some applications – that must be solved for its commercial application. To achieve the higher water flux and lower reverse salt flux, pressure assisted osmosis (PAO), in which pressure is applied to a feed solution (FS), has recently been proposed. In this work, experiments were carried out to investigate membrane structures and operating conditions in the PAO process by using three types of cellulose triacetate (CTA) — hollow fiber (HF) membranes. The HF membranes are preferable in the FO process because a high packing density and a large specific surface area can be obtained in the HF module. In addition, the HF membrane module has four ports and does not require a spacer between the membranes. The effects of the applied pressure, the draw solution concentration, and the structure parameter of the HF membranes on the PAO performance were investigated. The water flux in the PAO process was theoretically analyzed. The calculated results satisfactorily agreed with experimental data.

[1]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Modified models to predict flux behavior in forward osmosis in consideration of external and internal concentration polarizations , 2008 .

[2]  Akili D. Khawaji,et al.  Advances in seawater desalination technologies , 2008 .

[3]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Effect of hydraulic pressure and membrane orientation on water flux and reverse solute flux in pressure assisted osmosis , 2014 .

[4]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: Fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents , 2010 .

[5]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Gypsum scaling and cleaning in forward osmosis: measurements and mechanisms. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[7]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Study of integration of forward osmosis and biological process: Membrane performance under elevated salt environment , 2011 .

[8]  D.J.H. Harmsen,et al.  Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge , 2008 .

[9]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[10]  Huu Hao Ngo,et al.  Exploration of EDTA sodium salt as novel draw solution in forward osmosis process for dewatering of high nutrient sludge , 2014 .

[11]  Gaetan Blandin,et al.  Validation of assisted forward osmosis (AFO) process: Impact of hydraulic pressure , 2013 .

[12]  Hideto Matsuyama,et al.  Effect of operating conditions on osmotic-driven membrane performances of cellulose triacetate forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane , 2015 .

[13]  S. Loeb Large-scale power production by pressure-retarded osmosis, using river water and sea water passing through spiral modules , 2002 .

[14]  Luc Pinoy,et al.  A natural driven membrane process for brackish and wastewater treatment: photovoltaic powered ED and FO hybrid system. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration , 2010 .

[16]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process , 2005 .

[17]  Ngai Yin Yip,et al.  Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Emile R Cornelissen,et al.  Preliminary study of osmotic membrane bioreactor: effects of draw solution on water flux and air scouring on fouling. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[19]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Comprehensive bench- and pilot-scale investigation of trace organic compounds rejection by forward osmosis. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Tai-Shung Chung,et al.  Application of thin film composite membranes with forward osmosis technology for the separation of emulsified oil–water , 2014 .

[21]  R. Baker,et al.  Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis , 1981 .

[22]  Eric Litwiller,et al.  Solution-diffusion with defects model for pressure-assisted forward osmosis , 2014 .

[23]  Mario Reali,et al.  Computation of salt concentration profiles in the porous substrate of anisotropic membranes under steady pressure-retarded-osmosis conditions , 1990 .

[24]  Minkyu Park,et al.  Determination of a constant membrane structure parameter in forward osmosis processes , 2011 .

[25]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Opportunities to reach economic sustainability in forward osmosis–reverse osmosis hybrids for seawater desalination , 2015 .

[26]  Julius Glater,et al.  The early history of reverse osmosis membrane development , 1998 .

[27]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Adverse impact of feed channel spacers on the performance of pressure retarded osmosis. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Coupled reverse draw solute permeation and water flux in forward osmosis with neutral draw solutes , 2012 .

[29]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes , 2008 .

[30]  T. Mino,et al.  Acetate uptake by PHA-accumulating and non-PHA-accumulating organisms in activated sludge from an aerobic sequencing batch reactor fed with acetate. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[31]  Zhenyu Li,et al.  Indirect desalination of Red Sea water with forward osmosis and low pressure reverse osmosis for water reuse , 2011 .

[32]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A forward osmosis-membrane distillation hybrid process for direct sewer mining: system performance and limitations. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Osmotic power production from salinity gradient resource by pressure retarded osmosis: Effects of operating conditions and reverse solute diffusion , 2012 .

[34]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Modeling double-skinned FO membranes , 2011 .

[35]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes , 2009 .

[36]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .

[38]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Effects of transmembrane hydraulic pressure on performance of forward osmosis membranes. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: Implications for improved membrane design , 2007 .

[40]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: An experimental and theoretical investigation , 2009 .