Visual illusion in virtual world alters women’s target-directed walking
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Werner,et al. Experiments on sensory-tonic field theory of perception. VI. Effect of position of head, eyes, and of object on position of the apparent median plane. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.
[2] A. Cowey,et al. Visual field defects after frontal eye-field lesions in monkeys. , 1971, Brain research.
[3] B. Bridgeman,et al. Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.
[4] M. Linn,et al. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. , 1985, Child development.
[5] G Rizzolatti,et al. Functional organization of inferior area 6. , 1987, Ciba Foundation symposium.
[6] Richard A. Andersen,et al. A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons , 1988, Nature.
[7] Kenneth M. Heilman,et al. Attention to near and far space: The third dichotomy , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[8] F. Previc. Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[9] J. Marshall,et al. Left neglect for near but not far space in man , 1991, Nature.
[10] L. Stark,et al. Ocular proprioception and efference copy in registering visual direction , 1991, Vision Research.
[11] L. Jakobson,et al. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.
[12] T. R. Jordan,et al. Perception and action in 'visual form agnosia'. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[13] M. Goodale,et al. Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.
[14] M. Goldberg,et al. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: anatomic location and visual response properties. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.
[15] A. Cowey,et al. Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space , 1994, Neuropsychologia.
[16] C. Gross,et al. Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. , 1994, Science.
[17] Susan D. Voyer,et al. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.
[18] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.
[19] M. Goldberg,et al. Visual, presaccadic, and cognitive activation of single neurons in monkey lateral intraparietal area. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.
[20] S. Chieffi,et al. Visual illusion and action , 1996, Neuropsychologia.
[21] B. Bridgeman,et al. Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.
[22] F. Bremmer,et al. Spatial invarianceof visual receptivefields inparietal cortexneurons , 1997 .
[23] J. M. Dabbs,et al. Spatial Ability, Navigation Strategy, and Geographic Knowledge Among Men and Women , 1998 .
[24] Julie M. Harris,et al. Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow , 1998, Current Biology.
[25] S. Huettel,et al. Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[26] Nancy Kanwisher,et al. A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.
[27] T Landis,et al. Near and far visual space in unilateral neglect , 1998, Annals of neurology.
[28] Albert Postma,et al. Sex Differences in Object Location Memory , 1998, Brain and Cognition.
[29] Melvyn A. Goodale,et al. The Effect of Pictorial Illusion on Prehension and Perception , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[30] A. Berthoz,et al. Multisensory integration in spatial orientation , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[31] S. Asfour,et al. Discrete wavelet transform: a tool in smoothing kinematic data. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.
[32] A. Wunderlich,et al. Brain activation during human navigation: gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.
[33] K. Zilles,et al. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[34] Pierluigi Zoccolotti,et al. Influence of the radial and vertical dimensions on lateral neglect , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.
[35] Bruce Bridgeman,et al. Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system , 2000, Vision Research.
[36] Nicola Smania,et al. Coding of far and near space during walking in neglect patients. , 2002, Neuropsychology.
[37] M. L. Collaer,et al. Large Visuospatial Sex Difference in Line Judgment: Possible Role of Attentional Factors , 2002, Brain and Cognition.
[38] Francesco Lacquaniti,et al. Cognitive allocentric representations of visual space shape pointing errors , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.
[39] Eli Brenner,et al. Are the original Roelofs effect and the induced Roelofs effect caused by the same shift in straight ahead? , 2002, Vision Research.
[40] Y Rossetti,et al. Vision for spatial perception and vision for action: a dissociation between the left–right and near–far dimensions , 2003, Neuropsychologia.
[41] Bruce Bridgeman,et al. The induced Roelofs effect: two visual systems or the shift of a single reference frame? , 2004, Vision Research.
[42] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey , 1988, Experimental Brain Research.
[43] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.
[44] J. Hyvärinen,et al. I. Functional properties of neurons in lateral part of associative area 7 in awake monkeys , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.