How to Optimize High-Value GEP Areas to Identify Key Areas for Protection and Restoration: The Integration of Ecology and Complex Networks

Identifying and protecting key sites of ecological assets and improving spatial connectivity and accessibility are important measures taken to protect ecological diversity. This study takes Guangxi as the research area. Based on the gross ecosystem product (GEP), the ecological source is identified, and the initial ecological network (EN) is constructed by identifying the ecological corridor with the minimum cumulative resistance model. The internal defects of the initial ecological network are extracted using the circuit theory, the priority areas for restoration and protection with clear spatial positions are determined according to the complex network analysis, and the network’s performance before and after optimization is comprehensively evaluated. The results show that 456 initial ecological sources and 1219 ecological corridors have been identified, forming the initial ecological network of Guangxi. Based on the circuit theory, 168 ecological barriers, 83 ecological pinch points, and 71 ecological stepping stones were extracted for network optimization. After optimizing the ecological network, there are 778 ecological sources with a total area of 73,950.56 km2 and 2078 ecological corridors with a total length of 23,922.07 km. The GEP of the optimized structure is 13.33% higher than that of the non-optimized structure. The priority areas for protection are distributed in a large area, and the attached GEP reaches USD 118 billion, accounting for 72% of the total GEP attached to the optimized ecological source area. The priority areas for restoration are scattered in small patches, with a GEP of USD 19.27 billion. The robustness and connectivity of the optimized ecological network have been improved obviously. This study attempts to identify key sites of ecological assets and the priority regions for restoration and conservation using genuine geographical location and reference materials for regional ecological network optimization and implementation.

[1]  Beatrice Garske,et al.  Forest protection in the EU's renewable energy directive and nature conservation legislation in light of the climate and biodiversity crisis – Identifying legal shortcomings and solutions , 2023, Forest Policy and Economics.

[2]  A. Rigling,et al.  Conserving forest insect biodiversity requires the protection of key habitat features. , 2023, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  R. Lindborg,et al.  Biodiversity mitigates trade-offs among species functional traits underpinning multiple ecosystem services. , 2023, Ecology letters.

[4]  Jianjun Chen,et al.  Landscape Pattern and Ecological Risk Assessment in Guilin Based on Land Use Change , 2023, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[5]  Fei Wang,et al.  Study of spatialtemporal changes in Chinese forest eco-space and optimization strategies for enhancing carbon sequestration capacity through ecological spatial network theory. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Enhanced solution capabilities for multiple patch land allocation , 2022, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[7]  Y. Buckley,et al.  Reconciling climate action with the need for biodiversity protection, restoration and rehabilitation. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  Shiting Qiu,et al.  Restoration and renewal of ecological spatial network in mining cities for the purpose of enhancing carbon Sinks: The case of Xuzhou, China , 2022, Ecological Indicators.

[9]  R. Loyola,et al.  How 30 years of land-use changes have affected habitat suitability and connectivity for Atlantic Forest species , 2022, Biological Conservation.

[10]  Qingping Zhang,et al.  Delimitation of ecological corridors in a highly urbanizing region based on circuit theory and MSPA , 2022, Ecological Indicators.

[11]  Qiang Yu,et al.  Study on the Landscape Space of Typical Mining Areas in Xuzhou City from 2000 to 2020 and Optimization Strategies for Carbon Sink Enhancement , 2022, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Yanfang Liu,et al.  Robustness test of multiple protection strategies for ecological networks from the perspective of complex networks: Evidence from Wuhan Metropolitan Area, China , 2022, Land Degradation & Development.

[13]  Luying Wang,et al.  Measuring Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) in Guangxi, China, from 2005 to 2020 , 2022, Land.

[14]  Shiqi Tian,et al.  A static and dynamic coupling approach for maintaining ecological networks connectivity in rapid urbanization contexts , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[15]  Han Yang,et al.  Optimization of ecological security patterns considering both natural and social disturbances in China's largest urban agglomeration , 2022, Ecological Engineering.

[16]  Yuping Bai,et al.  Construction of ecological security pattern in national land space from the perspective of the community of life in mountain, water, forest, field, lake and grass: A case study in Guangxi Hechi, China , 2022, Ecological Indicators.

[17]  Wei Li,et al.  The Construction of Urban Park Green Infrastructure Network Based on Genetic Algorithm , 2022, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing.

[18]  Hai-long Ma,et al.  Global impacts of future urban expansion on terrestrial vertebrate diversity , 2022, Nature Communications.

[19]  Jiansheng Wu,et al.  Assessment of risks to habitat connectivity through the stepping-stone theory: a case study from Shenzhen, China , 2022, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[20]  Hongjun Liu,et al.  Spatial–Temporal Changes and Driving Force Analysis of Ecosystems in the Loess Plateau Ecological Screen , 2022, Forests.

[21]  Yan-sui Liu,et al.  Sustainable poverty alleviation and green development in China’s underdeveloped areas , 2022, Journal of Geographical Sciences.

[22]  Qiang Yu,et al.  Optimization of landscape spatial structure aiming at achieving carbon neutrality in desert and mining areas , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[23]  R. Magris,et al.  Drivers of ecological effectiveness of marine protected areas: A meta-analytic approach from the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean (Brazil). , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  N. S. Kumar,et al.  Links in a sink: Interplay between habitat structure, ecological constraints and interactions with humans can influence connectivity conservation for tigers in forest corridors. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  M. Fu,et al.  Linking Ecosystem Service and MSPA to Construct Landscape Ecological Network of the Huaiyang Section of the Grand Canal , 2021, Land.

[26]  Zhi-Yun Jiang,et al.  Construction and Optimization of an Urban Ecological Security Pattern Based on Habitat Quality Assessment and the Minimum Cumulative Resistance Model in Shenzhen City, China , 2021, Forests.

[27]  Yongyu Zhao,et al.  [Construction of ecological network in Qinling Mountains of Shaanxi, China based on MSPA and MCR model.] , 2021, Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology.

[28]  Hang Cheng,et al.  An integrated approach towards spatial identification of restored and conserved priority areas of ecological network for implementation planning in metropolitan region , 2021 .

[29]  J. Brodie,et al.  Fresh waters and estuaries of the Great Barrier Reef catchment: Effects and management of anthropogenic disturbance on biodiversity, ecology and connectivity. , 2021, Marine pollution bulletin.

[30]  Dawei Xu,et al.  Ecological Network Optimization in Urban Central District Based on Complex Network Theory: A Case Study with the Urban Central District of Harbin , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[31]  L. Cui,et al.  Construction and optimization of green space ecological networks in urban fringe areas: A case study with the urban fringe area of Tongzhou district in Beijing , 2020 .

[32]  Hua-li Tong,et al.  Using ecosystem service supply and ecosystem sensitivity to identify landscape ecology security patterns in the Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration, China , 2020, Journal of Mountain Science.

[33]  Rui Wang.  Ecological network analysis of China’s energy-related input from the supply side , 2020 .

[34]  Wenjun Wu,et al.  An evaluation framework for designing ecological security patterns and prioritizing ecological corridors: application in Jiangsu Province, China , 2020, Landscape Ecology.

[35]  Yanxu Liu,et al.  Integrating spatial continuous wavelet transform and kernel density estimation to identify ecological corridors in megacities , 2020 .

[36]  G. Daily,et al.  Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Kai Su,et al.  The establishment of a cross-regional differentiated ecological compensation scheme based on the benefit areas and benefit levels of sand-stabilization ecosystem service , 2020 .

[38]  Jiayu Wu,et al.  Why should landowners in protected areas be compensated? A theoretical framework based on value capture , 2020 .

[39]  Shi-liang Liu,et al.  Construction and optimization of an ecological network based on morphological spatial pattern analysis and circuit theory , 2020, Landscape Ecology.

[40]  J. Prevedello,et al.  The importance of protected areas for overexploited plants: Evidence from a biodiversity hotspot , 2020 .

[41]  Yecui Hu,et al.  Research on recognition and protection of ecological security patterns based on circuit theory: a case study of Jinan City , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[42]  A. Moilanen,et al.  Identification of ecological networks for land-use planning with spatial conservation prioritization , 2019, Landscape Ecology.

[43]  Alice C Hughes,et al.  Using landscape connectivity tools to identify conservation priorities in forested areas and potential restoration priorities in rubber plantation in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China , 2019, Landscape Ecology.

[44]  Shu-ming Zhao,et al.  Landscape pattern analysis and ecological network planning of Tianjin City , 2019 .

[45]  Zhili Liu,et al.  Simulation of a forest-grass ecological network in a typical desert oasis based on multiple scenes , 2019 .

[46]  K. Doick,et al.  Achieving impact from ecosystem assessment and valuation of urban greenspace: The case of i-Tree Eco in Great Britain , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[47]  N. S. Cunha,et al.  Methodology for mapping the national ecological network to mainland Portugal: A planning tool towards a green infrastructure , 2019, Ecological Indicators.

[48]  G. Sonnemann,et al.  Assessing habitat loss, fragmentation and ecological connectivity in Luxembourg to support spatial planning , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[49]  S. Pimm,et al.  Protected areas and biodiversity conservation in India , 2019, Biological Conservation.

[50]  L. Zou,et al.  [Construction of Wuhan's ecological security pattern under the "quality-risk-requirement" framework]. , 2019, Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology.

[51]  Jian Peng,et al.  Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify ecological security patterns. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[52]  G. Daily,et al.  Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital , 2016, Science.

[53]  Jun Wu,et al.  Optimal network topology for structural robustness based on natural connectivity , 2016 .

[54]  M. J. Hensel,et al.  Biodiversity enhances ecosystem multifunctionality across trophic levels and habitats , 2015, Nature Communications.

[55]  L. Guangchun,et al.  The spatial overlapping analysis for China’s natural protected area and countermeasures for the optimization and integration of protected area system , 2019, Biodiversity Science.

[56]  F. Escobedo,et al.  Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: Nexus or evolving metaphors? , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[57]  张艳 Zhang Yan,et al.  Gross ecosystem product：concept, accounting framework and case study , 2013 .

[58]  Kong Fan,et al.  Developing green space ecological networks in Jinan City , 2008 .