Effects of psychological attention on pronoun comprehension
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension , 2002 .
[2] J. Henderson,et al. The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .
[3] E. Bard,et al. Controlling the Intelligibility of Referring Expressions in Dialogue , 2000 .
[4] Juhani Järvikivi,et al. Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution , 2005, Psychological science.
[5] A. Garnham,et al. The Locus of Implicit Causality Effects in Comprehension. , 1996, Journal of memory and language.
[6] M. Beeman,et al. Building and Accessing Clausal Representations: The Advantage of First Mention versus the Advantage of Clause Recency. , 1989, Journal of memory and language.
[7] 付伶俐. 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .
[8] Scott Weinstein,et al. Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.
[9] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Approaches to studying world-situated language use : bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions , 2005 .
[10] J. Mandler. Language comprehension. , 1979, Science.
[11] Zenzi M. Griffin,et al. Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .
[12] L. Gleitman,et al. On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.
[13] J. Theeuwes. Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[14] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. The Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation , 2001 .
[15] Kathryn Bock,et al. Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production , 1980 .
[16] Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al. The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking , 2000, Cognition.
[17] Carla L. Hudson Kam,et al. Co-speech gesture as input in verb learning. , 2009, Developmental science.
[18] Irina A. Sekerina,et al. The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children , 1999, Cognition.
[19] Dare A. Baldwin,et al. Infants' contribution to the achievement of joint reference. , 1991, Child development.
[20] Carla L. Hudson Kam,et al. Knowing ‘who she is’ based on ‘where she is’: The effect of co-speech gesture on pronoun comprehension , 2012, Language and Cognition.
[21] Robin L. Hill,et al. Eye movements : a window on mind and brain , 2007 .
[22] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation , 1999, Cognition.
[23] A. Mack. Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .
[24] T. Givon. Topic Continuity in Discourse , 1983 .
[25] M. Tanenhaus,et al. The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation , 2003 .
[26] Candace L. Sidner,et al. Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.
[27] Rolf A. Zwaan,et al. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[28] Mira Ariel. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents , 1990 .
[29] J. Oberlander,et al. Interpreting pronouns and connectives: Interactions among focusing, thematic roles and coherence relations , 2000 .
[30] J. Elman,et al. Pronoun Interpretation as a Side Effect of Discourse Coherence , 2007 .
[31] Larissa K. Samuelson,et al. Memory and attention make smart word learning: an alternative account of Akhtar, Carpenter, and Tomasello. , 1998, Child development.
[32] D. Barr,et al. Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.
[33] S. Greenspan,et al. Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension , 1987 .
[34] Barbara J. Grosz,et al. Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..
[35] W. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Integrative Processes in Utterance Resolution , 1993 .
[36] J. C. Johnston,et al. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[37] W. Kintsch. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.
[38] Jennifer E. Arnold. Reference form and discourse patterns , 1998 .
[39] George R. Mangun,et al. Reflexive Attention Modulates Processing of Visual Stimuli in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Psychological science.
[40] A. Almor,et al. Noun-phrase anaphors and focus: the informational load hypothesis. , 1999, Psychological review.
[41] Victor S. Ferreira,et al. The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all , 2003 .
[42] Kathryn Bock,et al. Putting first things first , 2004 .
[43] D. Barr. Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression , 2008 .
[44] Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al. Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events , 1994 .
[45] Janet L. McDonald,et al. THE TIME COURSE OF ANAPHOR RESOLUTION: EFFECTS OF IMPLICIT VERB CAUSALITY AND GENDER , 1995 .
[46] Dare A. Baldwin,et al. Infants' ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference , 1993, Journal of Child Language.
[47] Timothy S. Paek,et al. Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge: Process Models of Common Ground in Comprehension , 1998 .
[48] W. Chafe. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .
[49] P. de Graef,et al. Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification , 1990, Psychological research.
[50] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: evidence from eye movements , 2004, Cogn. Sci..
[51] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. Women and Men Have Different Discourse Biases for Pronoun Interpretation , 2015 .
[52] M. Tomasello. Joint attention as social cognition. , 1995 .
[53] M. Posner,et al. Components of visual orienting , 1984 .
[54] Russell S. Tomlin,et al. Language and conceptualization: Mapping conceptual representations into linguistic representations: the role of attention in grammar , 1997 .
[55] S. Greenspan,et al. Updating situation models during narrative comprehension , 1989 .
[56] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .
[57] H. H. Clark,et al. In search of referents for nouns and pronouns , 1979 .
[58] J. Bransford,et al. Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach ☆ ☆☆ , 1972 .
[59] J. Trueswell,et al. The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language , 2004, Cognition.
[60] B. Webber,et al. Elements of Discourse Understanding , 1983 .
[61] C. Moore,et al. Joint attention : its origins and role in development , 1995 .
[62] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. The road to understanding is paved with the speaker’s intentions: Cues to the speaker’s attention and intentions affect pronoun comprehension , 2014, Cognitive Psychology.
[63] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes , 2008 .
[64] S. Brennan. Centering Attention in Discourse. , 1995 .
[65] S. Yantis,et al. Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.
[66] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.
[67] S. Brennan,et al. Speakers' eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face-to-face conversation , 2007 .
[68] B McElree,et al. Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[69] Mira Ariel. Accessibility theory: An overview , 2001 .
[70] Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al. Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .
[71] J.. Meaning , Sound , and Syntax : Lexical Priming in Sentence Production , 2001 .
[72] H. J. Muller,et al. Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[73] D. Barr,et al. Perspective taking and the coordination of meaning in language use , 2006 .
[74] John A. Hawkins,et al. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .
[75] J. V. Berkum,et al. On the use of verb-based implicit causality in sentence comprehension : Evidence from self-paced reading and eye tracking , 2006 .
[76] J. C. Johnston,et al. Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[77] G. Bower,et al. Mental models in narrative comprehension. , 1990, Science.
[78] Stephani Foraker,et al. The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations , 2007 .
[79] Jeanette K. Gundel,et al. Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993 .
[80] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. How Speakers Refer: The Role of Accessibility , 2010, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[81] N. Mackworth,et al. Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[82] Kathryn Bock,et al. Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .
[83] T. Givón. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction , 1983 .
[84] Robbert-Jan Beun,et al. Object reference in a shared domain of conversation , 1998 .
[85] A. Kingstone,et al. The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .
[86] K. Boff,et al. Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.
[87] J. Trueswell,et al. Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution , 2008 .
[88] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. Children's use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension , 2007 .
[89] H. Cowles,et al. Linguistic and cognitive prominence in anaphor resolution: topic, contrastive focus and pronouns , 2007 .
[90] R. Klein,et al. Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[91] M. Gernsbacher,et al. Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.
[92] M. Walker,et al. Centering Theory in Discourse , 1998 .
[93] J. Jonides. Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .
[94] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Within-category VOT affects recovery from "lexical" garden paths: Evidence against phoneme-level inhibition. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.
[95] W. Kintsch,et al. Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .
[96] Maurizio Corbetta,et al. Oculomotor activity and visual spatial attention , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.
[97] G. Dell,et al. Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.
[98] James R. Brockmole,et al. Should I stay or should I go? Attentional disengagement from visually unique and unexpected items at fixation. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[99] W. Levelt,et al. Eye movements during the production of nouns and pronouns , 2001, Memory & cognition.
[100] R Ratcliff,et al. Discourse models, pronoun resolution, and the implicit causality of verbs. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[101] D. Barr,et al. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.