Effects of psychological attention on pronoun comprehension

Pronoun comprehension is facilitated for referents that are focused in the discourse context. Discourse focus has been described as a function of attention, especially shared attention, but few studies have explicitly tested this idea. Two experiments used an exogenous capture cue paradigm to demonstrate that listeners' visual attention at the onset of a story influences their preferences during pronoun resolution later in the story. In both experiments trial-initial attention modulated listeners' transitory biases while considering referents for the pronoun, whether it was in response to the capture cue or not. These biases even had a small influence on listeners' final interpretation of the pronoun. These results provide independently motivated evidence that the listener's attention influences the online processes of pronoun comprehension. Trial-initial attentional shifts were made on the basis of non-shared, private information, demonstrating that attentional effects on pronoun comprehension are not restricted to shared attention among interlocutors.

[1]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension , 2002 .

[2]  J. Henderson,et al.  The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .

[3]  E. Bard,et al.  Controlling the Intelligibility of Referring Expressions in Dialogue , 2000 .

[4]  Juhani Järvikivi,et al.  Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution , 2005, Psychological science.

[5]  A. Garnham,et al.  The Locus of Implicit Causality Effects in Comprehension. , 1996, Journal of memory and language.

[6]  M. Beeman,et al.  Building and Accessing Clausal Representations: The Advantage of First Mention versus the Advantage of Clause Recency. , 1989, Journal of memory and language.

[7]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[8]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[9]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Approaches to studying world-situated language use : bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions , 2005 .

[10]  J. Mandler Language comprehension. , 1979, Science.

[11]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[12]  L. Gleitman,et al.  On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[13]  J. Theeuwes Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation , 2001 .

[15]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production , 1980 .

[16]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking , 2000, Cognition.

[17]  Carla L. Hudson Kam,et al.  Co-speech gesture as input in verb learning. , 2009, Developmental science.

[18]  Irina A. Sekerina,et al.  The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children , 1999, Cognition.

[19]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Infants' contribution to the achievement of joint reference. , 1991, Child development.

[20]  Carla L. Hudson Kam,et al.  Knowing ‘who she is’ based on ‘where she is’: The effect of co-speech gesture on pronoun comprehension , 2012, Language and Cognition.

[21]  Robin L. Hill,et al.  Eye movements : a window on mind and brain , 2007 .

[22]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation , 1999, Cognition.

[23]  A. Mack Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .

[24]  T. Givon Topic Continuity in Discourse , 1983 .

[25]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation , 2003 .

[26]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.

[27]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Mira Ariel Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents , 1990 .

[29]  J. Oberlander,et al.  Interpreting pronouns and connectives: Interactions among focusing, thematic roles and coherence relations , 2000 .

[30]  J. Elman,et al.  Pronoun Interpretation as a Side Effect of Discourse Coherence , 2007 .

[31]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Memory and attention make smart word learning: an alternative account of Akhtar, Carpenter, and Tomasello. , 1998, Child development.

[32]  D. Barr,et al.  Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[33]  S. Greenspan,et al.  Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension , 1987 .

[34]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[35]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Integrative Processes in Utterance Resolution , 1993 .

[36]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  W. Kintsch The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[38]  Jennifer E. Arnold Reference form and discourse patterns , 1998 .

[39]  George R. Mangun,et al.  Reflexive Attention Modulates Processing of Visual Stimuli in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Psychological science.

[40]  A. Almor,et al.  Noun-phrase anaphors and focus: the informational load hypothesis. , 1999, Psychological review.

[41]  Victor S. Ferreira,et al.  The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all , 2003 .

[42]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Putting first things first , 2004 .

[43]  D. Barr Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression , 2008 .

[44]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events , 1994 .

[45]  Janet L. McDonald,et al.  THE TIME COURSE OF ANAPHOR RESOLUTION: EFFECTS OF IMPLICIT VERB CAUSALITY AND GENDER , 1995 .

[46]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Infants' ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[47]  Timothy S. Paek,et al.  Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge: Process Models of Common Ground in Comprehension , 1998 .

[48]  W. Chafe Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .

[49]  P. de Graef,et al.  Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification , 1990, Psychological research.

[50]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: evidence from eye movements , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Women and Men Have Different Discourse Biases for Pronoun Interpretation , 2015 .

[52]  M. Tomasello Joint attention as social cognition. , 1995 .

[53]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[54]  Russell S. Tomlin,et al.  Language and conceptualization: Mapping conceptual representations into linguistic representations: the role of attention in grammar , 1997 .

[55]  S. Greenspan,et al.  Updating situation models during narrative comprehension , 1989 .

[56]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .

[57]  H. H. Clark,et al.  In search of referents for nouns and pronouns , 1979 .

[58]  J. Bransford,et al.  Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach ☆ ☆☆ , 1972 .

[59]  J. Trueswell,et al.  The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language , 2004, Cognition.

[60]  B. Webber,et al.  Elements of Discourse Understanding , 1983 .

[61]  C. Moore,et al.  Joint attention : its origins and role in development , 1995 .

[62]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The road to understanding is paved with the speaker’s intentions: Cues to the speaker’s attention and intentions affect pronoun comprehension , 2014, Cognitive Psychology.

[63]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes , 2008 .

[64]  S. Brennan Centering Attention in Discourse. , 1995 .

[65]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[67]  S. Brennan,et al.  Speakers' eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face-to-face conversation , 2007 .

[68]  B McElree,et al.  Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[69]  Mira Ariel Accessibility theory: An overview , 2001 .

[70]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[71]  J. Meaning , Sound , and Syntax : Lexical Priming in Sentence Production , 2001 .

[72]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[73]  D. Barr,et al.  Perspective taking and the coordination of meaning in language use , 2006 .

[74]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .

[75]  J. V. Berkum,et al.  On the use of verb-based implicit causality in sentence comprehension : Evidence from self-paced reading and eye tracking , 2006 .

[76]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[77]  G. Bower,et al.  Mental models in narrative comprehension. , 1990, Science.

[78]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations , 2007 .

[79]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993 .

[80]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  How Speakers Refer: The Role of Accessibility , 2010, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[81]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[82]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .

[83]  T. Givón Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction , 1983 .

[84]  Robbert-Jan Beun,et al.  Object reference in a shared domain of conversation , 1998 .

[85]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[86]  K. Boff,et al.  Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[87]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution , 2008 .

[88]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Children's use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension , 2007 .

[89]  H. Cowles,et al.  Linguistic and cognitive prominence in anaphor resolution: topic, contrastive focus and pronouns , 2007 .

[90]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[91]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.

[92]  M. Walker,et al.  Centering Theory in Discourse , 1998 .

[93]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[94]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Within-category VOT affects recovery from "lexical" garden paths: Evidence against phoneme-level inhibition. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[95]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[96]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Oculomotor activity and visual spatial attention , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.

[97]  G. Dell,et al.  Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[98]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Should I stay or should I go? Attentional disengagement from visually unique and unexpected items at fixation. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[99]  W. Levelt,et al.  Eye movements during the production of nouns and pronouns , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[100]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Discourse models, pronoun resolution, and the implicit causality of verbs. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[101]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.