Product Performance Evaluation - a Super-Efficiency Model

This study introduces the concept of product performance from the perspective of customers. Product performance is measured as a ratio of outputs that customers obtain from a product relative to inputs that customers have to spend for purchasing and using the product. The output side is modelled by a set of customer-relevant parameters such as technical performance attributes but also non-functional benefits and brand strength; the input side reflects user costs. More than 60% of the cars in this study are rated as efficient and obtain the maximum efficiency value of unity. They form the efficient frontier of the compact car market representing a reference function for performance evaluation. Using a super-efficiency model, it is possible to differentiate the efficient products that are left with a score of 100% by standard efficiency models. Our approach is relevant for companies because implications for product design and market segmentation can be derived.

[1]  V. Zeithaml.  Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[2]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Controlling for Observed and Unobserved Managerial Skills in Determining First-Mover Market Share Advantages , 1996 .

[3]  C. Hjorth-Andersen,et al.  The Concept of Quality and the Efficiency of Markets for Consumer Products , 1984 .

[4]  W. Bearden,et al.  Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions , 1982 .

[5]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating Efficiencies of Turbofan Jet Engines: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 2000 .

[6]  H. H. Bauer,et al.  Value-Based Benchmarking and Market Partitioning , 2007 .

[7]  Tasadduq A. Shervani,et al.  Marketing, Business Processes, and Shareholder Value: An Organizationally Embedded View of Marketing Activities and the Discipline of Marketing , 1999 .

[8]  John Doyle,et al.  Strategic choice and data envelopment analysis: comparing computers across many attributes , 1994, J. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Thomas V. Bonoma,et al.  Marketing Performance Assessment , 1988 .

[10]  Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.  Measuring Market Efficiency and Welfare Loss , 1988 .

[11]  Jayashree Mahajan,et al.  A data envelopment analytic model for assessing the relative efficiency of the selling function , 1991 .

[12]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  An Integrated Approach toward the Spatial Modeling of Perceived Customer Value , 1998 .

[13]  Matthias Staat,et al.  Environmental variables and relative efficiency of bank branches: a DEA-bootstrap approach , 2005 .

[14]  K. Lancaster.  A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[16]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  Benchmarking Advertising Efficiency , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[17]  Leonard M. Lodish,et al.  An Implemented System for Improving Promotion Productivity Using Store Scanner Data , 1993 .

[18]  Michael Norman,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: The Assessment of Performance , 1991 .

[19]  Leonard J. Parsons,et al.  Productivity Versus Relative Efficiency in Marketing: Past and Future? , 1994 .

[20]  H. Bauer,et al.  Structuring Product-Markets: An Approach Based on Customer Value , 2007 .

[21]  Moutaz Khouja,et al.  The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection , 1995 .

[22]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Would you buy a used car with DEA? , 1997 .

[23]  James Odeck,et al.  The performance of trucks — an evaluation using data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[24]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Comparing products using data envelopment analysis , 1991 .

[25]  Christos Papahristodoulou,et al.  A DEA model to evaluate car efficiency , 1997 .

[26]  Peter C. Smith,et al.  Lancaster's characteristics approach revisited: product selection using non-parametric methods , 2002 .

[27]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .