Legal environment, government effectiveness and firms' innovation in China: Examining the moderating influence of government ownership

Using the World Bank's data in China, we analyzed the behavior of Chinese firms to find out governance factors in innovation activities of these firms. The results suggest that in China, an emerging economy in Northeast Asia, the local legal environment has had a significantly positive effect on firms' product innovation, technological innovation, process innovation and management innovation. Government ownership positively moderates the relationship between the local legal environment and technological innovation. However, government ownership negatively moderates the relationship between the local legal environment and management innovation. Moreover, government effectiveness has also had a significantly positive effect on a firm's product innovation, technological innovation, process innovation and management innovation. In addition, government ownership negatively moderates the relationship between government effectiveness and management innovation. This study offers fresh insight on the role of governance factors of legal environment, government effectiveness and ownership in firms' innovation activities.

[1]  Brian D. Wright.  The Economics of Invention Incentives: Patents, Prizes, and Research Contracts , 1983 .

[2]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[4]  J. Butler.  Theories of technological innovation as useful tools for corporate strategy , 1988 .

[5]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  The adoption of innovation by local government , 1976 .

[6]  Yu Cui,et al.  When should organizational change be implemented? The moderating effect of environmental dynamism between dynamic capabilities and new venture performance , 2013 .

[7]  Chen Lin,et al.  Managerial Incentives, CEO Characteristics and Corporate Innovation in China’s Private Sector , 2009 .

[8]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest european companies , 2000 .

[9]  Frans van Waarden,et al.  Institutions and Innovation: The Legal Environment of Innovating Firms , 2001 .

[10]  C. I. Jones,et al.  Why Do Some Countries Produce so Much More Output Per Worker than Others? , 1998 .

[11]  H. Demsetz.  Toward a Theory of Property Rights , 1967 .

[12]  Cooperative research, government involvement, and timing of innovations , 1985 .

[13]  Qiwen Lu,et al.  The organization of innovation in a transitional economy: business and government in Chinese electronic publishing , 2001 .

[14]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  The Dynamics of the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in Organizations , 2001 .

[15]  Gershon Feder,et al.  The adoption of agricultural innovations: A review , 1993 .

[16]  William L. Megginson,et al.  The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: an International Empirical Analysis , 1994, Estudios de Administración.

[17]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[18]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Competition, financial discipline and growth , 1999 .

[19]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  The New Comparative Economics , 2002 .

[20]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims , 2009 .