Integrating intermediate inputs from partially classified images within a hybrid classification framework: An impervious surface estimation example

article i nfo With the constant proliferation of computational power, our ability to develop hybrid classifiers has improved. Hybrid classifiers integrate results from multiple algorithms and often improve classification accuracy. In this paper, a hybrid classification framework was used to evaluate two research hypotheses: i) can manipulated results from prior classifiers ("intermediate inputs" (IIs)) improve classification accuracy in subsequent classification steps. and ii) is there an optimal dataset proportion for creation and usage of intermediate inputs. These additional intermediate inputs were based on spatial and texture statistics calculated on a partially classified image. The implementation of intermediate inputs on an impervious surface classification task using a 2001 Landsat ETM+ image from central New York was demonstrated. The results suggested that there was an average accuracy improvement of 3.6% (maximum 6.6%) by using intermediate inputs. These improvements were proved statistically significant by a Z-test and tended to increase as classification difficulty increased. The experiments in this paper also showed that there was an optimal point that balanced the number of pixels and pixel classification accuracy from prior steps used to produce intermediate inputs. Additionally, some traditional problems such as separation of impervious surfaces and soil were successfully tackled through intermediate inputs. The concept of the intermediate inputs may easily apply to other sensors and/or ground features.

[1]  Uwe Stilla,et al.  Remote Sensing of Impervious Surfaces , 2007 .

[2]  Sangbum Lee,et al.  Subpixel analysis of Landsat ETM/sup +/ using self-organizing map (SOM) neural networks for urban land cover characterization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Limin Yang,et al.  An approach for mapping large-area impervious surfaces: synergistic use of Landsat-7 ETM+ and high spatial resolution imagery , 2003 .

[4]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Satellite inventory of Minnesota forest resources , 1994 .

[6]  Brian M. Steele,et al.  Combining Multiple Classifiers: An Application Using Spatial and Remotely Sensed Information for Land Cover Type Mapping , 2000 .

[7]  C. H. Chen,et al.  Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision , 1993 .

[8]  D. Lu,et al.  Spectral mixture analysis of ASTER images for examining the relationship between urban thermal features and biophysical descriptors in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA , 2006 .

[9]  R. Klein URBANIZATION AND STREAM QUALITY IMPAIRMENT , 1979 .

[10]  Xuefei Hu,et al.  Estimating impervious surfaces from medium spatial resolution imagery using the self-organizing map and multi-layer perceptron neural networks. , 2009 .

[11]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a 2001 National land-cover database for the United States , 2004 .

[12]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Monitoring the composition of urban environments based on the vegetation-impervious surface-soil (VIS) model by subpixel analysis techniques , 2002 .

[13]  Randel L. Dymond,et al.  Evaluation of Impervious Surface Estimates in a Rapidly Urbanizing Watershed , 2004, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing.

[14]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis , 2003 .

[15]  D. Roberts,et al.  Sub-pixel mapping of urban land cover using multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis: Manaus, Brazil , 2007 .

[16]  Mike Cranea,et al.  ESTIMATION OF SUB-PIXEL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES USING LANDSAT AND ASTER IMAGERY FOR ASSESSING URBAN GROWTH , 2005 .

[17]  C. Arnold,et al.  IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: THE EMERGENCE OF A KEY ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR , 1996 .

[18]  Giorgos Mountrakis Next Generation Classifiers : Focusing on Integration Frameworks , 2008 .

[19]  J. Meyer,et al.  Streams in the Urban Landscape , 2001 .

[20]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[21]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Neural Network Ensembles , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[22]  R. Forman,et al.  ROADS AND THEIR MAJOR ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS , 1998 .

[23]  Shobha V. Iyer,et al.  Urban landuse monitoring using neural network classification , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[24]  Sebastiano B. Serpico,et al.  A Markov random field approach to spatio-temporal contextual image classification , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[25]  Paul F. Hopkins,et al.  Urban cover mapping using digital, high-spatial resolution aerial imagery , 2001, Urban Ecosystems.

[26]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[27]  Xuefei Hu,et al.  Estimating impervious surfaces from medium spatial resolution imagery: a comparison between fuzzy classification and LSMA , 2011 .

[28]  Sucharita Gopal,et al.  Uncertainty and Confidence in Land Cover Classification Using a Hybrid Classifier Approach , 2004 .

[29]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[30]  D. Roberts,et al.  Hierarchical Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Analysis (MESMA) of hyperspectral imagery for urban environments , 2009 .

[31]  Stephen B. Vardeman,et al.  Estimation of Context for Statistical Classification of Multispectral Image Data , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[32]  G. Mountrakis,et al.  Developing collaborative classifiers using an expert-based model. , 2009 .

[33]  R. Coburn,et al.  A HYBRID APPROACH TO DETECTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AT MULTIPLE- SCALES , 2005 .

[34]  Marvin E. Bauer,et al.  ESTIMATION, MAPPING AND CHANGE ANALYIS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA BY LANDSAT REMOTE SENSING , 2005 .

[35]  R. Congalton,et al.  Accuracy assessment: a user's perspective , 1986 .

[36]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis , 1986 .

[37]  Richard G. Lathrop,et al.  Sub-pixel estimation of urban land cover components with linear mixture model analysis and Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery , 2005 .

[38]  Ignazio Gallo,et al.  A cognitive pyramid for contextual classification of remote sensing images , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[39]  Anders Krogh,et al.  Neural Network Ensembles, Cross Validation, and Active Learning , 1994, NIPS.

[40]  Nathaniel D. Herold,et al.  MAPPING IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AND FOREST CANOPY USING CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREE (CART) ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[41]  T. Schueler The importance of imperviousness , 1995 .