The mechanical transformation and environmentally conscious behavior

Abstract The aim of this work is to explore the relationship between products that mechanically transform and individual environmentally conscious behavior (ECB). Our qualitative study led to observations on how each of the three transformation principles, expand/collapse, expose/cover, and fuse/divide, specifically supports ECBs. As expected, expand/collapse enables better portability of products. Increased portability of reusable products (e.g., travel mugs and shopping bags) reduces reliance on their disposable counterparts. A less expected observation is that increased portability also increases the spontaneity by which ECBs could be carried out. While there are fewer ECB supporting products that incorporate the expose/cover principle, we believe that it enables one to include, yet hide potentially unaesthetic, features that support ECB in often-used or worn items. Finally, we found fuse/divide to enable portability beyond what is possible with expand/collapse alone. Fuse/divide may also make possible other product transport and reuse strategies. We conclude that mechanically transformable products support and enable ECBs, especially when existing infrastructure presents obstacles. Such products may increase the rate of participation in ECB, which then justifies improvements to the shortfalls in infrastructure for which they compensate.

[1]  Francis C. Dane,et al.  Evaluating Research: Methodology for People Who Need to Read Research , 2010 .

[2]  Jayesh Srivastava,et al.  Encouraging Environmentally Conscious Behaviour Through Product Design: The Principle of Discretization , 2011 .

[3]  Jayesh Srivastava,et al.  Encouraging Resource-Conscious Behavior Through Product Design: The Principle of Discretization , 2013 .

[4]  P. Stern.  New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[5]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Transformers in the Development of a Storyboarding Methodology , 2009, DAC 2009.

[6]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review , 2009 .

[7]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Concept Opportunity Diagrams: A Visual Modeling Method to Find Multifunctional Design Concepts , 2010, DAC 2010.

[8]  Jay Jungik.  Role of Transformation Principles in Enabling Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2012 .

[9]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Principles of Green Design: Analyzing User Activities and Product Feedback , 2012 .

[10]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Innovations in Design Through Transformation: A Fundamental Study of Transformation Principles , 2009 .

[11]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Transformation Design Theory: A Meta-Analogical Framework , 2010, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[12]  Jayesh Srivastava,et al.  Affordances and Product Design to Support Environmentally Conscious Behavior , 2013 .

[13]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  Empathic Lead Users: The Effects of Extraordinary User Experiences on Customer Needs Analysis and Product Redesign , 2008 .

[14]  Daniel Jensen,et al.  When to Transform? Development of Indicators for Design Context Evaluation , 2010 .

[15]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Design for Transformation: Theory, Method and Application , 2007 .

[16]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Flexible and Reconfigurable Systems: Nomenclature and Review , 2007, DAC 2007.

[17]  Katja Hölttä-Otto,et al.  Identifying Customer Needs: Disabled Persons as Lead Users , 2006 .

[18]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[19]  Cassandra Telenko,et al.  A Methodology for Identifying Environmentally Conscious Guidelines for Product Design , 2010 .

[20]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  TRANSFORMATION FACILITATORS: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF RECONFIGURABLE PRODUCTS AND THEIR CHARACTERISTICS , 2008, DAC 2008.