Probabilistic Subset Conjunction

The authors introduce subset conjunction as a classification rule by which an acceptable alternative must satisfy some minimum number of criteria. The rule subsumes conjunctive and disjunctive decision strategies as special cases.Subset conjunction can be represented in a binary-response model, for example, in a logistic regression, using only main effects or only interaction effects. This results in a confounding of the main and interaction effects when there is little or no response error. With greater response error, a logistic regression, even if it gives a good fit to data, can produce parameter estimates that do not reflect the underlying decision process. The authors propose a model in which the binary classification of alternatives into acceptable/unacceptable categories is based on a probabilistic implementation of a subset-conjunctive process. The satisfaction of decision criteria biases the odds toward one outcome or the other. The authors then describe a two-stage choice model in which a (possibly large) set of alternatives is first reduced using a subset-conjunctive rule, after which an alternative is selected from this reduced set of items. They describe methods for estimating the unobserved consideration probabilities from classification and choice data, and illustrate the use of the models for cancer diagnosis and consumer choice. They report the results of simulations investigating estimation accuracy, incidence of local optima, and model fit.

[1]  Jean-Pierre Barthélemy,et al.  Information processing in similarity judgments , 1996 .

[2]  Joffre Swait,et al.  A NON-COMPENSATORY CHOICE MODEL INCORPORATING ATTRIBUTE CUTOFFS , 2001 .

[3]  Endre Boros,et al.  Predicting Cause-Effect Relationships from Incomplete Discrete Observations , 1994, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[4]  Rick L. Andrews,et al.  Studying Consideration Effects in Empirical Choice Models Using Scanner Panel Data , 1995 .

[5]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[6]  R. Dawes Judgment under uncertainty: The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making , 1979 .

[7]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[8]  Peter Wright Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying Vs. Optimizing , 1975 .

[9]  I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1976 .

[10]  Joel Huber,et al.  Adapting Cutoffs to the Choice Environment: The Effects of Attribute Correlation and Reliability , 1991 .

[11]  David M. Grether,et al.  An Analysis of Conjunctive Choice: Theory and Experiments , 1984 .

[12]  John Roberts,et al.  Development and Testing of a Model of Consideration Set Composition , 1991 .

[13]  Monica Martinussen,et al.  Linda versus World Cup: Conjunctive Probabilities in Three-event Fictional and Real-life Predictions , 1996 .

[14]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete choice analysis , 1989 .

[15]  W. N. Street,et al.  Computerized breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis from fine-needle aspirates. , 1995, Archives of surgery.

[16]  Iven Van Mechelen,et al.  A Branch-and-bound Algorithm for Boolean Regression , 1998 .

[17]  H. J. Einhorn The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. , 1970, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Calyampudi Radhakrishna Rao,et al.  Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications , 1967 .

[19]  E. Maris Estimating multiple classification latent class models , 1999 .

[20]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[21]  Mirjam R. M. Westenberg,et al.  Multi-attribute evaluation process: Methodological and conceptual issues , 1994 .

[22]  Clyde H. Coombs Mathematical Models in Psychological Scaling , 1951 .

[23]  R. Olshavsky,et al.  Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Brand Choice , 1979 .

[24]  Y. Crama,et al.  Cause-effect relationships and partially defined Boolean functions , 1988 .

[25]  Calyampudi R. Rao,et al.  Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications. , 1975 .

[26]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[27]  I. Mechelen Prediction of a dichotomous criterion variable by means of a logical combination of dichotomous predictors , 1988 .

[28]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Decision Rules and the Search for a Dominance Structure: Towards a Process Model of Decision Making* , 1983 .

[29]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[30]  G. Maddala Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[31]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[32]  R. Dawes,et al.  Linear models in decision making. , 1974 .

[33]  Carl F. Mela,et al.  Using fuzzy set theoretic techniques to identify preference rules from interactions in the linear model: an empirical study , 1995 .