Simulating offset blast loads experimentally using shake‐table‐generated ground motions: Method development and validation

The experimental investigation of the effects of blasts and other impulsive‐type loads on large‐scale structures provides valuable data to inform design decisions for structures and structural control devices; however, this type of testing presents significant security, safety, logistical, and economic challenges. In particular, only a limited number of facilities are capable of blast testing of large‐scale structures. In contrast, many structural engineering and structural control research projects now employ shake‐table testing. With this in mind, the authors have developed a technique to experimentally simulate the global response of a large‐scale, flexible structure subjected to blast loading using a shake‐table‐produced ground motion. A ground motion profile designed for experimental blast simulation is proposed, and an algorithm for shaping this ground motion, based on near equivalence of modal energy distribution, is presented. Validation is performed through a set of experimental studies on a laboratory‐scale nine‐story structure outfitted with a passive nonlinear structural control system. In the first part of the validation, explosive blast testing of the structure was performed at the US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering Research and Development Center, Big Black Test Site; and in the second part, shake‐table testing of the same structure using a synthesized ground motion was performed at the US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering Research and Development Center, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory. Comparison of the two studies demonstrates that an appropriately designed, shake‐table‐produced ground motion can be employed to experimentally simulate the global response of a structure subjected to blast loading with reasonable accuracy with and without a nonlinear structural control system.

[1]  Andrew J. Kurdila,et al.  『Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics』(私の一冊) , 2019, Journal of the Society of Mechanical Engineers.

[2]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Response attenuation in a large-scale structure subjected to blast excitation utilizing a system of essentially nonlinear vibration absorbers , 2017 .

[3]  Danesh Nourzadeh Response of Building Structure and its Components to Blast Loads , 2017 .

[4]  Brian M. Phillips,et al.  Performance and Protection of Base-Isolated Structures under Blast Loading , 2016 .

[5]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Track Nonlinear Energy Sink for Rapid Response Reduction in Building Structures , 2015 .

[6]  Shuqing Zhang,et al.  Application Study and Performance Testing of Cross-spring Flexible Hooke Hinge in Static Balancing Instrument , 2015 .

[7]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Large-scale experimental evaluation and numerical simulation of a system of nonlinear energy sinks for seismic mitigation , 2014 .

[8]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Design, simulation, and large‐scale testing of an innovative vibration mitigation device employing essentially nonlinear elastomeric springs , 2014 .

[9]  Gilbert A. Hegemier,et al.  Demonstration of tailored impact to achieve blast-like loading , 2014 .

[10]  L. K. Stewart,et al.  Methodology and validation for blast and shock testing of structures using high-speed hydraulic actuators , 2014 .

[11]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Experimental Testing and Numerical Simulation of a Six-Story Structure Incorporating Two-Degree-of-Freedom Nonlinear Energy Sink , 2014 .

[12]  Brian M. Phillips,et al.  Model‐based multi‐metric control of uniaxial shake tables , 2014 .

[13]  L. K. Stewart,et al.  Characterization of the Blast Simulator elastomer material using a pseudo-elastic rubber model , 2013 .

[14]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Numerical and experimental investigation of a highly effective single-sided vibro-impact non-linear energy sink for shock mitigation , 2013 .

[15]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Experimental Testing of a Large 9-Story Structure Equipped with Multiple Nonlinear Energy Sinks Subjected to an Impulsive Loading , 2013 .

[16]  Lawrence A. Bergman,et al.  Passive damping enhancement of a two-degree-of-freedom system through a strongly nonlinear two-degree-of-freedom attachment , 2012 .

[17]  Steffen Marburg,et al.  An Abridged Review of Blast Wave Parameters , 2012 .

[18]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Effective Stiffening and Damping Enhancement of Structures With Strongly Nonlinear Local Attachments study the stiffening and damping effects that local essentially nonlinear attachments , 2012 .

[19]  Hyonny Kim,et al.  Non-explosive simulated blast loading of balsa core sandwich composite beams , 2011 .

[20]  null null,et al.  Blast Protection of Buildings , 2011 .

[21]  Frieder Seible,et al.  Blast Simulator Testing of Structures: Methodology and Validation , 2011 .

[22]  Narutoshi Nakata,et al.  Acceleration trajectory tracking control for earthquake simulators , 2010 .

[23]  J. G. Chase,et al.  Spectral analysis of semi-actively controlled structures subjected to blast loading , 2009 .

[24]  Kenneth B. Morrill,et al.  Response of Concrete Masonry Walls to Simulated Blast Loads , 2009 .

[25]  Tuan Ngo,et al.  Blast Loading and Blast Effects on Structures – An Overview , 2007, Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering.

[26]  H. Kit Miyamoto,et al.  Structural Control of Dynamic Blast Loading , 2000 .

[27]  William Neff Patten,et al.  High‐fidelity control of a seismic shake table , 1999 .

[28]  H. Adeli,et al.  Optimal control of adaptive building structures under blast loading , 1998 .

[29]  James B. Gambill,et al.  The CERL Equipment Fragility and Protection Procedure (CEFAPP): Experimental Definition of Equipment Vulnerability to Transient Support Motions. , 1997 .

[30]  Xxyyzz,et al.  Design of Blast Resistant Buildings in Petrochemical Facilities , 1997 .

[31]  H. A. Gaberson,et al.  Simplified Shock Design for Installation of Equipment , 1982 .

[32]  W. Matthews,et al.  OVERPRESSURES AND DURATIONS OF SHOCK WAVES EMERGING FROM OPEN-ENDED SHOCK TUBES , 1965 .

[33]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  New Results in Linear Filtering and Prediction Theory , 1961 .

[34]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2002 .

[35]  W. A. Martin A REVIEW OF SHOCK TUBES AND SHOCK TUNNELS , 1958 .