Post-Silicon Optimization of a Highly Programmable 64-MHz PLL Achieving 2.7-5.7 μW

Hierarchical optimization methods used in the design of complex mixed-signal systems require accurate behavioral models to avoid the long simulation times of transistor-level SPICE simulations of the whole system. However, robust behavioral models that accurately model circuit non-idealities and their complex interactions must be very complex themselves and are hardly achievable. Post-silicon tuning, which is already widely used for the calibration of analog building blocks, is an interesting alternative to speed up the optimization of these complex systems. However, post-silicon tuning usually focuses on single-objective problems in blocks with a limited number of degrees of freedom. In this paper, we propose a post-silicon “hardware-in-the-loop” optimization method to solve multi-objective problems in mixed-signal systems with numerous degrees of freedom. We use this method to optimize the noise-power trade-off of a 64-MHz phase-locked loop (PLL) based on a back-bias-controlled ring oscillator. A genetic algorithm was run based on measurements of the 22-nm fully-depleted silicon-on-insulator prototype to find the Pareto-optimal configurations in terms of power and long-term jitter. The obtained Pareto front gives a range of power consumption between 2.7 and 5.7 μW, corresponding to an RMS long-term jitter between 88 and 45 ns. Whereas the simulation-based optimization would require more than a year using the genetic algorithm based on SPICE simulations, we conducted the post-silicon optimization in only 17 h.

[1]  D. Flandre,et al.  Comprehensive Analytical Comparison of Ring Oscillators in FDSOI Technology: Current Starving Versus Back-Bias Control , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[2]  D. Bol,et al.  A Family of Current References Based on 2T Voltage References: Demonstration in 0.18-μm With 0.1-nA PTAT and 1.1-μA CWT 38-ppm/°C Designs , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[3]  Gregor Schatzberger,et al.  Post-Manufacturing Process and Temperature Calibration of a 2-MHz On-Chip Relaxation Oscillator , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[4]  David Bol,et al.  A Configurable ULP Instrumentation Amplifier With Pareto-Optimal Power-Noise Trade-Off Achieving 1.93 NEF in 65nm CMOS , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs.

[5]  D. Bol,et al.  SleepRider: a 5.5μW/MHz Cortex-M4 MCU in 28nm FD-SOI with ULP SRAM, Biomedical AFE and Fully-Integrated Power, Clock and Back-Bias Management , 2021, 2021 Symposium on VLSI Circuits.

[6]  Behzad Razavi,et al.  Jitter-Power Trade-Offs in PLLs , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[7]  Chenchang Zhan,et al.  A −40 °C to 120 °C, 169 ppm/°C Nano-Ampere CMOS Current Reference , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs.

[8]  Pavan Kumar Hanumolu,et al.  A 0.016 mm2 0.26- $\mu$ W/MHz 60–240-MHz Digital PLL With Delay-Modulating Clock Buffer in 65 nm CMOS , 2019, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[9]  Patrick P. Mercier,et al.  A 0.4-V 0.93-nW/kHz Relaxation Oscillator Exploiting Comparator Temperature-Dependent Delay to Achieve 94-ppm/°C Stability , 2018, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[10]  Giuseppe Iannaccone,et al.  A portable class of 3‐transistor current references with low‐power sub‐0.5 V operation , 2018, Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl..

[11]  Ali Sheikholeslami,et al.  Understanding Jitter and Phase Noise: A Circuits and Systems Perspective , 2018 .

[12]  Nitin Gupta,et al.  A 0.0175mm2 600µW 32kHz input 307MHz output PLL with 190psrms jitter in 28nm FD-SOI , 2016, ESSCIRC Conference 2016: 42nd European Solid-State Circuits Conference.

[13]  Anand Kumar,et al.  A 600µA 32 kHz input 960 MHz output CP-PLL with 530ps integrated jitter in 28nm FD-SOI process , 2014, ESSCIRC 2014 - 40th European Solid State Circuits Conference (ESSCIRC).

[14]  Pradip Mandal,et al.  Modeling and design of CMOS analog circuits through hierarchical abstraction , 2013, Integr..

[15]  Xiao Pu,et al.  Area-Efficient Low-Noise Low-Spur Architecture for an Analog PLL Working From a Low Frequency Reference , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs.

[16]  Peng Li,et al.  Hierarchical Analog/Mixed-Signal Circuit Optimization Under Process Variations and Tuning , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[17]  P. Andreani,et al.  Enhancement of VCO Linearity and Phase Noise by Implementing Frequency Locked Loop , 2007, EUROCON 2007 - The International Conference on "Computer as a Tool".

[18]  Rob A. Rutenbar,et al.  Hierarchical Modeling, Optimization, and Synthesis for System-Level Analog and RF Designs , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  Ulf Schlichtmann,et al.  A CPPLL hierarchical optimization methodology considering jitter, power and locking time , 2006, 2006 43rd ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference.

[20]  Georges G. E. Gielen,et al.  Performance space modeling for hierarchical synthesis of analog integrated circuits , 2005, Proceedings. 42nd Design Automation Conference, 2005..

[21]  N. Abouchi,et al.  Top-down, constraint driven design: application to sigma-delta modulator , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, 2004. IEEE ICIT '04..

[22]  Mitchell D. Trott,et al.  A Modeling Approach for – Fractional- N Frequency Synthesizers Allowing Straightforward Noise Analysis , 2001 .

[23]  Rob A. Rutenbar,et al.  A case study of synthesis for industrial-scale analog IP: redesign of the equalizer/filter frontend for an ADSL CODEC , 2000, Proceedings 37th Design Automation Conference.

[24]  Edoardo Charbon,et al.  General AC constraint transformation for analog ICs , 1998, Proceedings 1998 Design and Automation Conference. 35th DAC. (Cat. No.98CH36175).

[25]  S.C. Gupta,et al.  Phase-locked loops , 1975, Proceedings of the IEEE.