Consensus, Polarization and Clustering of Opinions in Social Networks

We consider a variation of the Deffuant-Weisbuch model introduced by Deffuant et al. in 2000, to provide new analytical insights on the opinion dynamics in a social group. We model the trust that may exist between like-minded agents through a trust function, which is a discontinuous (hard-interaction) non-increasing function of the opinion distance. In this model, agents exchange their opinions with their neighbors and move their opinions closer to each other if they are like-minded (that is, the distance between opinions is smaller than a threshold). We first study the dynamics of opinion formation under random interactions with a fixed rate of communication between pairs of agents. Our goal is to analyze the convergence properties of the opinion dynamics and explore the underlying characteristics that mark the phase transition from opinion polarization to consensus. Furthermore, we extend the hard-interaction model to a strategic interaction model by considering a time-varying rate of interaction. In this model, social agents themselves decide the time and energy that should be expended on interacting each of their neighbors, based on their utility functions. The aim is to understand how and under what conditions clustering patterns emerge in opinion space. Extensive simulations are provided to validate the analytical results of both the hard-interaction model and the strategic interaction model. We also offer evidence that suggests the validity of the proposed model, using the location and monthly survey data collected in the Social Evolution experiment over a period of nine months.

[1]  Ruggero Carli,et al.  Accuracy and Decision Time for Sequential Decision Aggregation , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  On Krause's Multi-Agent Consensus Model With State-Dependent Connectivity , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[3]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[4]  W. Wood Attitude change: persuasion and social influence. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  Chris Arney,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World (Easley, D. and Kleinberg, J.; 2010) [Book Review] , 2013, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[6]  Kenneth Y. Goldberg,et al.  Opinion space: a scalable tool for browsing online comments , 2010, CHI.

[7]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Interacting Agents and Continuous Opinions Dynamics , 2001, cond-mat/0111494.

[8]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[9]  C. Mudie Navigating the ‘Small World’ , 1959 .

[10]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Problems in decentralized decision making and computation , 1984 .

[11]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[12]  C. Chamley Rational Herds: Economic Models of Social Learning , 2003 .

[13]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  Phase transition in opinion diffusion in social networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[14]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  Trust, opinion diffusion and radicalization in social networks , 2011, 2011 Conference Record of the Forty Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR).

[15]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Navigation in a small world , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[17]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[18]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[19]  Francesco Bullo,et al.  On opinion dynamics in heterogeneous networks , 2010, Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference.

[20]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Opinion Dynamics and Learning in Social Networks , 2010, Dyn. Games Appl..

[21]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[22]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Sensing the "Health State" of a Community , 2012, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[23]  E. David,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World , 2010 .

[24]  H. Leibenstein Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand , 1950 .

[25]  Behrouz Touri,et al.  Multi-dimensional Hegselmann-Krause dynamics , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[26]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Modeling the co-evolution of behaviors and social relationships using mobile phone data , 2011, MUM.

[27]  Gerard Weisbuch Bounded confidence and social networks , 2004 .