Soil physical quality of Luvisols under agroforestry, natural vegetation and conventional crop management systems in the Brazilian semi-arid region

Abstract The imposition of agricultural systems changes the natural equilibrium of the soil to an extent that it becomes dependant on management practices and soil resilience. Agroforestry systems (AFs) mimic characteristics of natural ecosystems such as multistrata canopy and deep rooting and may minimize the consequences of these changes by providing soil protection and maintenance of conditions similar to those under natural vegetation. This study evaluates the physical properties of a Luvisol at a site where since 1997 alternative agroforestry systems (AFs) (agrosilvipasture—AGP and silvipasture—SILV), conventional crop management (CCM) and natural vegetation (NV) have been maintained. Undisturbed soil cores were collected in 2005 and submitted to a range of matric suction for which soil bulk density (BD), soil penetration resistance ( Q ) and soil water content ( θ ) were determined. Water retention and penetration resistance were used to determine the least limiting water range (LLWR) and the slope of the soil water retention curve at its inflection point ( S -value). Particle size, total organic carbon (TOC) and particle density were determined using the disturbed soil samples. Water retention and porosity followed the sequence NV > SILV > CCM > AGP. The AFs studied (AGP and SILV) improved or maintained soil physical quality when compared to NV with no significant differences between the S -values of 0.044, 0.042 and 0.050, respectively. However, the S -value of 0.035 for CCM indicates that this management was unable to maintain soil physical quality on the same levels as AFs and NV. The decrease of LLWR with BD occurred for all treatments, and the BD at a maximum effect (LLWR = 0) which is called the critical BD (BD c ), was, respectively, 1.69, 1.62, 1.56 and 1.56 Mg m −3 for AGP, SILV, NV and CCM. The larger values of LLWR for AFs (AGP and SILV) are similar to the value for NV, with associated superior aeration, matric suction and reduced resistance to penetration by roots. Indices such as LLWR and S -value were suitably sensitive and could be used in future research, but it is important to identify other potential indices for these situations that can show how quickly changes in soil quality may occur.

[1]  U. Albuquerque,et al.  Useful Plants of the Semi-Arid Northeastern Region of Brazil – A Look at their Conservation and Sustainable Use , 2006, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[2]  T. D. Oliveira,et al.  Frações de nitrogênio em Luvissolo sob sistemas agroflorestais e convencional no semi-árido cearense , 2008 .

[3]  H. R. Haise,et al.  Soil Moisture Studies of Some Great Plains Soils: II. Field Capacity as Related to 1/3‐Atmosphere Percentage, and “Minimum Point” as Related to 15‐ and 26‐Atmosphere Percentages , 1955 .

[4]  R. Sands,et al.  Least limiting water range : a potential indicator of physical quality of forest soils , 2000 .

[5]  D. Cutler,et al.  Effects of cutting regimes in the dry and wet season on survival and sprouting of woody species from the semi-arid caatinga of northeast Brazil , 2006 .

[6]  W. J. Busscher,et al.  ADJUSTMENT OF FLAT-TIPPED PENETROMETER RESISTANCE DATA TO A COMMON WATER CONTENT , 1990 .

[7]  A. Austin,et al.  Plant litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem controlled by photodegradation , 2006, Nature.

[8]  D. Devitt,et al.  Turfgrass quality, growth, and water use influenced by salinity and water stress , 1996 .

[9]  G. Topp,et al.  Least limiting water range indicators of soil quality and corn production, eastern Ontario, Canada , 2004 .

[10]  S. Maia,et al.  Sediment, nutrient and water losses by water erosion under agroforestry systems in the semi-arid region in northeastern Brazil , 2010, Agroforestry Systems.

[11]  I. Håkansson,et al.  Reference bulk density and critical degree-of-compactness for no-till crop production in subtropical highly weathered soils , 2009 .

[12]  A. Dexter,et al.  QUANTIFICATION OF THE SOIL PHYSICAL QUALITY OF A TROPICAL OXISOL USING THE S INDEX , 2008 .

[13]  Pilar Llorens,et al.  Uncertainty and efficiency of pedotransfer functions for estimating water retention characteristics of soils , 2008 .

[14]  I. Salcedo,et al.  Effect of different fire severities on coppicing of caatinga vegetation in Serra Talhada, PE, Brazil , 1993 .

[15]  A. Ab'saber.  Sertões e sertanejos: uma geografia humana sofrida , 1999 .

[16]  Michael J. Savage,et al.  Lower Limit of Soil Water Availability , 1996 .

[17]  C. A. Tormena,et al.  Soil physical quality of a Brazilian Oxisol under two tillage systems using the least limiting water range approach , 1999 .

[18]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Land use effects on soil organic matter properties of chromic luvisols in semi-arid northern Tanzania: carbon, nitrogen, lignin and carbohydrates. , 2000 .

[19]  Á. P. Silva,et al.  Soil resistance to penetration and least limiting water range for soybean yield in a haplustox from Brazil , 2005 .

[20]  D. Hillel.  Environmental soil physics , 1998 .

[21]  E. Perfect,et al.  Characterization of the least limiting water range of soils , 1994 .

[22]  B. D. Kay,et al.  Estimating the Least Limiting Water Range of Soils from Properties and Management , 1997 .

[23]  W. Ehlers,et al.  Penetration resistance and root growth of oats in tilled and untilled loess soil , 1983 .

[24]  Á. Silva,et al.  Compactação do solo e intervalo hídrico ótimo na produtividade de arroz de sequeiro , 2004 .

[25]  E. Mendonça,et al.  Organic carbon pools in a Luvisol under agroforestry and conventional farming systems in the semi-arid region of Ceará, Brazil , 2007, Agroforestry Systems.

[26]  R. Allmaras,et al.  Least Limiting Water Range: Traffic and Long-term Tillage Influences in a Webster Soil , 1998 .

[27]  B. D. Kay,et al.  The sensitivity of shoot growth of corn to the least limiting water range of soils , 1996, Plant and Soil.

[28]  A. A. Mahboubi,et al.  Soil water availability for plants as quantified by conventional available water, least limiting water range and integral water capacity , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[29]  G. Topp,et al.  THE DETERMINATION OF SOIL-WATER DESORPTION CURVES FOR SOIL CORES , 1979 .

[30]  T. P. Leão,et al.  Least limiting water range: A potential indicator of changes in near-surface soil physical quality after the conversion of Brazilian Savanna into pasture , 2006 .

[31]  J. Currie.  Soil Water , 1969, Nature.

[32]  Ole H. Jacobsen,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA AND SOIL PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES , 1996 .

[33]  C. Rosolem,et al.  Least limiting water range and crop yields as affected by crop rotations and tillage , 2010 .

[34]  S. Charpentier,et al.  Improvement of soil structure formation by degradation of coarse organic matter , 2011 .

[35]  Timothy B. Parkin,et al.  Defining and Assessing Soil Quality , 1994 .

[36]  Vance T. Holliday,et al.  Methods of soil analysis, part 1, physical and mineralogical methods (2nd edition), A. Klute, Ed., 1986, American Society of Agronomy, Agronomy Monographs 9(1), Madison, Wisconsin, 1188 pp., $60.00 , 1990 .

[37]  A. R. Grable,et al.  Effects of Bulk Density, Aggregate Size, and Soil Water Suction on Oxygen Diffusion, Redox Potentials, and Elongation of Corn Roots 1 , 1968 .

[38]  A. Klute.  Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. , 1988 .

[39]  J. M. Bremner,et al.  A rapid and precise method for routine determination of organic carbon in soil , 1988 .

[40]  Warren J. Busscher,et al.  IN SITU STRENGTH, BULK DENSITY, AND WATER CONTENT RELATIONSHIPS OF A DURINODIC XERIC HAPLOCALCID SOIL , 2001 .

[41]  J. Kessler,et al.  The potential benefits of agroforestry in the Sahel and other semi-arid regions , 1997 .

[42]  T. D. Oliveira,et al.  Impactos de sistemas agroflorestais e convencional sobre a qualidade do solo no semi-árido cearense , 2006 .

[43]  Anthony R. Dexter,et al.  Soil physical quality: Part III: Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and general conclusions about S-theory , 2004 .

[44]  J. Herrick,et al.  Multi-scale variability in soil aggregate stability: Implications for understanding and predicting semi-arid grassland degradation , 2007 .

[45]  B. Kay,et al.  Linking process capability analysis and least limiting water range for assessing soil physical quality , 2004 .

[46]  H. A. Ruiz.  Incremento da exatidão da análise granulométrica do solo por meio da coleta da suspensão (Silte + Argila) , 2005 .

[47]  L. P. van Reeuwijk,et al.  Pedotransfer functions for the estimation of moisture retention characteristics of Ferralsols and related soils , 1997 .

[48]  E. Sampaio.  Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests: Overview of the Brazilian caatinga , 1995 .

[49]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[50]  T. P. Leão,et al.  An Algorithm for Calculating the Least Limiting Water Range of Soils , 2005 .

[51]  C. Cerri,et al.  Linking physical quality and CO2 emissions under long-term no-till and conventional-till in a subtropical soil in Brazil , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[52]  B. D. Kay,et al.  Rates of Change of Soil Structure Under Different Cropping Systems , 1990 .

[53]  M. Shao,et al.  Change of soil physical properties under long-term natural vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau of China , 2006 .