Learning Individual Thermal Comfort using Robust Locally Weighted Regression with Adaptive Bandwidth

Ensuring that the thermal comfort conditions in offices are in line with the preferences of the occupants, is one of the main aims of a heating/cooling control system, in order to save energy, increase productivity and reduce sick leave days. The industry standard approach for modelling occupant comfort is Fanger’s Predicted Mean Vote (PMV). Although PMV is able to predict user thermal satisfaction with reasonable accuracy, it is a generic model, and requires the measurement of many variables (including air temperature, radiant temperature, humidity, the outdoor environment) some of which are difficult to measure in practice (e.g. activity levels and clothing). As an alternative, we propose Robust Locally Weighted Regression with Adaptive Bandwidth (LRAB) to learn individual occupant preferences based on historical reports. As an initial investigation, we attempt to do this based on just one input parameter, the internal air temperature. Using publicly available datasets, we demonstrate that this technique can be significantly more accurate in predicting individual comfort than PMV, relies on easily obtainable input data, and is fast to compute. It is therefore a promising technique to be used as input to adpative HVAC control systems.

[1]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .

[2]  P. Fanger Moderate Thermal Environments Determination of the PMV and PPD Indices and Specification of the Conditions for Thermal Comfort , 1984 .

[3]  Max H. Sherman,et al.  A simplified model of thermal comfort , 1985 .

[4]  R. Dedear,et al.  Validation of the predicted mean vote model of thermal comfort in six Australian field studies , 1985 .

[5]  L. Berglund,et al.  A standard predictive index of human response to the thermal environment , 1986 .

[6]  R. J. Dear,et al.  Thermal comfort in the humid tropics. Part I. Climate chamber experiments on temperature preferences in Singapore , 1991 .

[7]  J. Busch A tale of two populations: thermal comfort in air-conditioned and naturally ventilated offices in Thailand , 1992 .

[8]  Standard Ashrae Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[9]  Clifford C. Federspiel,et al.  User-Adaptable Comfort Control for HVAC Systems , 1992, 1992 American Control Conference.

[10]  T. Hastie,et al.  Local Regression: Automatic Kernel Carpentry , 1993 .

[11]  K. Yang,et al.  AN APPROACH TO BUILDING ENERGY SAVINGS USING THE PMV INDEX , 1997 .

[12]  Gail Brager,et al.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[13]  M. A. Humphreys Recent Progress in the Adaptive Approach to Thermal Comfort , 2000 .

[14]  A.T.P. So,et al.  Implementation of comfort-based air-handling unit control algorithms , 2000 .

[15]  Ardeshir Mahdavi,et al.  Integrating thermal comfort field data analysis in a case-based building simulation environment , 2001 .

[16]  Gail Brager,et al.  Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55 , 2002 .

[17]  J. F. Nicol,et al.  The validity of ISO-PMV for predicting comfort votes in every-day thermal environments , 2002 .

[18]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[19]  Thananchai Leephakpreeda,et al.  Neural computing thermal comfort index for HVAC systems , 2005 .

[20]  Nic Wilson,et al.  Learning User Preferences to Maximise Occupant Comfort in Office Buildings , 2010, IEA/AIE.

[21]  Ma Bingxin,et al.  Experimental design and the GA-BP prediction of human thermal comfort index , 2011, 2011 Seventh International Conference on Natural Computation.

[22]  Jiong Shu,et al.  Experimental design and the GA-BP prediction of human thermal comfort index , 2011, ICNC.

[23]  Kenneth N. Brown,et al.  Workshop on AI Problems and Approaches for Intelligent Environments , 2012 .