Customer Needs Based Product Family Sizing Design: The Viper Case Study

This study explores the issue of optimizing the size of a product family as well as designing the product variants of the family in the context of designing a stand for a unique electric violin known as the “Viper.” The study uses collected customer data in order to identify the optimal number of design variants in the product family, generate design alternatives, assign each design to the appropriate customer type, and verify the outcome. The methodology begins with data collection through a survey of Viper players which is analyzed using K-means clustering analysis and segmentation in order to determine the optimal number of variants in the product family. This analysis also defines each customer group and each group’s specific customer requirements. Quality function deployment (QFD) is used to fit design concepts (generated by the requirements and specifications) to synthesized design variants and assign to a customer group. Then, analytic network process (ANP) is used to substantiate the outcome of the study by further verifying each Product Family Member-Customer Group mapping as well as the number of variants. This is achieved by simultaneously fitting the generated design concepts to customer requirements and customer groups through ANP. The ultimate goal of this work is to provide a simple, easy to understand, easy to reproduce, and customizable method for making product family size and design decisions in any industry.

[1]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  Product family modeling for mass customization , 1998 .

[2]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Product portfolio identification based on association rule mining , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[3]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[4]  Conrad S. Tucker,et al.  Data-Driven Decision Tree Classification for Product Portfolio Design Optimization , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[5]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  Platform-based product design and development: A knowledge-intensive support approach , 2006, Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytical network process , 1998 .

[7]  Kikuo Fujita,et al.  Product variety optimization under modular architecture , 2002, Comput. Aided Des..

[8]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  Design for mass customization , 1996 .

[9]  Javier P. Gonzalez-Zugasti,et al.  Modular product architecture , 2001 .

[10]  Li Li,et al.  Genetic algorithm-based optimisation method for product family design with multi-level commonality , 2008 .

[11]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A market-driven approach to product family design , 2009 .

[12]  Ming-Chuan Chiu,et al.  A multi-stakeholder quality function deployment approach to support design decision-making , 2008 .

[13]  Venkat Allada,et al.  Scalable Product Family Design: Case Study of Axial Piston Pumps , 2009 .

[14]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The Power of Product Platforms , 1997 .

[15]  Yixiong Feng,et al.  A methodology to support product platform optimization using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: , 2008 .

[16]  Claire Cardie,et al.  Constrained K-means Clustering with Background Knowledge , 2001, ICML.

[17]  Jih-Jeng Huang,et al.  Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process , 2005, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[18]  B A Bickness,et al.  THE ROAD MAP TO REPEATABLE SUCCESS: USING QFD TO IMPLEMENT CHANGE , 1995 .

[19]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: A Comprehensive Review of Its Concepts and Methods , 2002 .

[20]  Sa’Ed M. Salhieh,et al.  A methodology to redesign heterogeneous product portfolios as homogeneous product families , 2007, Comput. Aided Des..

[21]  Siddheswar Ray,et al.  Determination of Number of Clusters in K-Means Clustering and Application in Colour Image Segmentation , 2000 .